by Tony Clifton » Thu Jun 16, 2016 5:15 pm
by Aerie » Thu Jun 16, 2016 5:27 pm
Tony Clifton wrote:So are WT and Port working towards a merger for the 2017/18 season?
by oyster » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:02 pm
Tony Clifton wrote:So are WT and Port working towards a merger for the 2017/18 season?
by The Hound » Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:57 pm
oyster wrote:Tony Clifton wrote:So are WT and Port working towards a merger for the 2017/18 season?
Merger won't happen at all and both sides will be a part of the SACA competition for many years to come. You can bet on it.
More than happy to take anyones bet, if they think either or both clubs, won't be around at the end of 2016/2017
by Tony Clifton » Sun Jun 19, 2016 1:23 am
by ferret » Sun Jun 19, 2016 9:50 am
by oyster » Sun Jun 19, 2016 9:37 pm
Tony Clifton wrote:Would be 12 clubs kicked out
by heater31 » Sun Jun 19, 2016 9:43 pm
oyster wrote:Tony Clifton wrote:Would be 12 clubs kicked out
Only one would be kicked out, and they are the ones without juniors. Spend all their time poaching players from clubs with juniors and contribute very little to the competition. I think its a fairly logical solution of who gets the boot. Not one of the proper district clubs thats for sure. Although Adelaide and Glenelg could now go and I wouldn't lose any sleep because of their behind the scenes treachery to both WT and PA.
by oyster » Sun Jun 19, 2016 10:03 pm
heater31 wrote:oyster wrote:Tony Clifton wrote:Would be 12 clubs kicked out
Only one would be kicked out, and they are the ones without juniors. Spend all their time poaching players from clubs with juniors and contribute very little to the competition. I think its a fairly logical solution of who gets the boot. Not one of the proper district clubs thats for sure. Although Adelaide and Glenelg could now go and I wouldn't lose any sleep because of their behind the scenes treachery to both WT and PA.
No Juniors.....that puts Port Adelaide in the gun again
by Tony Clifton » Sun Jun 19, 2016 11:17 pm
oyster wrote:Tony Clifton wrote:Would be 12 clubs kicked out
Only one would be kicked out, and they are the ones without juniors. Spend all their time poaching players from clubs with juniors and contribute very little to the competition. I think its a fairly logical solution of who gets the boot. Not one of the proper district clubs thats for sure. Although Adelaide and Glenelg could now go and I wouldn't lose any sleep because of their behind the scenes treachery to both WT and PA.
by oyster » Mon Jun 20, 2016 1:28 am
Tony Clifton wrote:oyster wrote:Tony Clifton wrote:Would be 12 clubs kicked out
Only one would be kicked out, and they are the ones without juniors. Spend all their time poaching players from clubs with juniors and contribute very little to the competition. I think its a fairly logical solution of who gets the boot. Not one of the proper district clubs thats for sure. Although Adelaide and Glenelg could now go and I wouldn't lose any sleep because of their behind the scenes treachery to both WT and PA.
All premier grade competitions around the country have a University team in them.
They would have junior teams if they were allowed to. It's not them choosing not to. I believe that they have junior teams in other sports.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:16 am
heater31 wrote:oyster wrote:Tony Clifton wrote:Would be 12 clubs kicked out
Only one would be kicked out, and they are the ones without juniors. Spend all their time poaching players from clubs with juniors and contribute very little to the competition. I think its a fairly logical solution of who gets the boot. Not one of the proper district clubs thats for sure. Although Adelaide and Glenelg could now go and I wouldn't lose any sleep because of their behind the scenes treachery to both WT and PA.
No Juniors.....that puts Port Adelaide in the gun again
by Iron Fist » Tue Jun 21, 2016 4:09 pm
heater31 wrote:oyster wrote:Tony Clifton wrote:Would be 12 clubs kicked out
Only one would be kicked out, and they are the ones without juniors. Spend all their time poaching players from clubs with juniors and contribute very little to the competition. I think its a fairly logical solution of who gets the boot. Not one of the proper district clubs thats for sure. Although Adelaide and Glenelg could now go and I wouldn't lose any sleep because of their behind the scenes treachery to both WT and PA.
No Juniors.....that puts Port Adelaide in the gun again
by heater31 » Tue Jun 21, 2016 4:24 pm
by Aerie » Tue Jun 21, 2016 6:53 pm
heater31 wrote:So are Port Adelaide fielding a full compliment of SACA teams in both for the coming season? if so that is great news for the Club.
That also means they can stop contacting emerging players from other clubs that are getting opportunities at the club that developed them...
by oyster » Tue Jun 21, 2016 6:54 pm
heater31 wrote:So are Port Adelaide fielding a full compliment of SACA teams in both for the coming season? if so that is great news for the Club.
That also means they can stop contacting emerging players from other clubs that are getting opportunities at the club that developed them...
by maxi » Tue Jun 21, 2016 10:29 pm
by backoftheroom » Tue Jun 21, 2016 11:28 pm
by Tony Clifton » Wed Jun 22, 2016 9:31 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |