by The Dark Knight » Sun Jun 12, 2016 5:21 am
by Jim05 » Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:54 am
by Jim05 » Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:55 am
by jackpot jim » Mon Jun 13, 2016 1:17 am
Jim05 wrote:And we see another example of a poor review system. Pradeep clean bowls Hales but ump calls no ball. On replay it was a clear legitimate ball but bowler can't review it and ump can't overturn it.
Yet every time a batsman is dismissed they check for a no ball
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jun 14, 2016 12:57 pm
jackpot jim wrote:Jim05 wrote:And we see another example of a poor review system. Pradeep clean bowls Hales but ump calls no ball. On replay it was a clear legitimate ball but bowler can't review it and ump can't overturn it.
Yet every time a batsman is dismissed they check for a no ball
Just seen it.
Yep, Agree.
The system has become a joke.
Its inexcusable for an umpire to call a No Ball when its actually NOT !
Would rather see them err on the side of not calling them knowing that there will be a review if the do make a mistake off a ball a wicket falls.
Theres 2 ways to solve this issue.
1/ Bowlers should always have some part of their foot COMFORTABLY behind the line to take any doubt out of the mind of the umpire.
2/ Umpires not to call No Balls for overstepping at all and just leave it solely to the 3rd umpire to review every ball
Now Cook has been caught in front LBW but wasnt given out. Sri Lanka havent reviewed it becos of losing a review just a few overs earlier for a close LBW. Ball tracker shows it hitting in line and going on to smash into the stumps.
2 blokes still out there batting when neither should be,
Surely its not that hard to put a system in place with the technology available to get the RIGHT decisions.
by bennymacca » Tue Jun 14, 2016 3:45 pm
by The Dark Knight » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:41 pm
by The Dark Knight » Fri Jul 15, 2016 8:51 pm
by The Dark Knight » Fri Jul 15, 2016 8:55 pm
by bennymacca » Fri Jul 15, 2016 9:03 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:Just saw that Grenville has created a thread for the current series. Can a moderator add Pakistan to the name of this thread title and/or merge the two threads?
by heater31 » Fri Jul 15, 2016 9:09 pm
bennymacca wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Just saw that Grenville has created a thread for the current series. Can a moderator add Pakistan to the name of this thread title and/or merge the two threads?
i cant work out why people dont want to just start a new thread?
much more logical than editing a thread that has a bunch of other stuff at the top
by The Dark Knight » Fri Jul 15, 2016 9:09 pm
bennymacca wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Just saw that Grenville has created a thread for the current series. Can a moderator add Pakistan to the name of this thread title and/or merge the two threads?
i cant work out why people dont want to just start a new thread?
much more logical than editing a thread that has a bunch of other stuff at the top
by The Dark Knight » Fri Jul 15, 2016 9:12 pm
heater31 wrote:Maybe next season we just call it English Summer Series?
by bennymacca » Fri Jul 15, 2016 9:17 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |