Pick 64 vs pick 71

Talk on the national game

Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby redwhiteandblueblooded » Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:07 pm

pick 64- Nick Gill, twice recycled thru other AFL teams, 24/25 yrs old, dodgy hammies, kicks like ?
pick 71- Justin Westhoff, young, good hands, good accurate kick

Another example of the AFC's poor recruiting of late?
redwhiteandblueblooded
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Gawler South
Has liked: 107 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: Gawler Central

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby Blue Boy » Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:13 pm

redwhiteandblueblooded wrote:pick 64- Nick Gill, twice recycled thru other AFL teams, 24/25 yrs old, dodgy hammies, kicks like ?
pick 71- Justin Westhoff, young, good hands, good accurate kick

Another example of the AFC's poor recruiting of late?


I am always on the crows case about drafting but in this case I was suprised @ the power taking Westhoff any way. It turns out that the lad fits in @ that level real well though.

I think the Crows were always going to have a go @ drafting Gill after Hentschell was ruled out for the year. Sellar is there development player - but I would like to see him playing now as well.
It is what it is !!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Location: Any where between here and there
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby Hondo » Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:47 pm

There are plenty of draft stories like that

In hindsight tho have to agree Port look like they did better

But who knows with Gill??? He showed something on the weekend I thought .... once they work on his kicking :wink:
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby JK » Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:03 pm

I wasn't surprised at all that Westhoff was taken, I've been a massice wrap for him for a few years now ... Hard to point the bone at the Crows though when 14 other teams also passed him up.

Great drafting yet again by the Powers (x2) that be though ...
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby smac » Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:02 pm

Your point about 14 other teams is correct CP, but the crows chose Gill ahead of Westhoff - which I think was the original point.

COmparing the 2 players, both have an uncanny knack for finding the ball and strong hands. After that, one is very young, the other not so. One has good kicking skills, the other not so. I reckon the crows did err in this case (not saying Gill wasn't worthy of a shot at AFL).

I sometimes wonder if the Crows get caught up in hype about local players?
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby Macca19 » Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:23 pm

I believe that if those picks had been reversed and Port had pick 64 then they would have chosen Gill as well. Im pretty sure Gill trained with us pre-draft and was high on our radar.

Westhoff would have been drafted either by the Crows, by Port in the pre season or by someone in the rookie draft. I think he was always going to go at some point.

Gill has more noticeable faults than Westhoff but not many people would have thought that Westhoff would show so much flair and footy nous and make his lack of muscle a complete non issue. One of the smartest tall forwards ive seen. Gill has the X factor where he could win a match in 5 minutes.
Macca19
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1961
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:54 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 10 times
Grassroots Team: Ports

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby stan » Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:06 pm

hondo71 wrote:There are plenty of draft stories like that

In hindsight tho have to agree Port look like they did better

But who knows with Gill??? He showed something on the weekend I thought .... once they work on his kicking :wink:


Gill did show a bit on the weekend, but Westhoff has shown a fair bit more.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15522
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1318 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby Hondo » Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:07 pm

stan wrote:Gill did show a bit on the weekend, but Westhoff has shown a fair bit more.


Agreed
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby wal65 » Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:11 pm

If Westoff was on the crows list, he would probably still be playing for Centrals.
User avatar
wal65
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:09 am
Location: Up the creek without a paddle
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Blyth-Snowtown

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby Wedgie » Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:29 pm

Unfair to compare them as Gill was recruited as a bakcup if key forwards got injured where Westhoff was recruited as a long term project. Westhoff has come on quicker than expected and except for his kicking after his first game you'd have to say Gill looks like playing his spot as a replacement forward beautifully too.
Looking at last year's entire draft and I can honestly say Ive never heard of 95% of them so if you compre selection 61 to any amount before him and you'd say the Crows have done well.
A fair comparison would be comparing the top 10 draft picks and working out how Geelong faired the best with Selwood.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby hearts on fire » Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:55 pm

Westhoff overall looks better, but we have only seen Gill play once at AFL level. If he plays the next couple of weeks and gets his kicking right, that could tell whos better.
~ R.I.P John McCarthy, 19-11-1989 - 9-9-2012 ~
User avatar
hearts on fire
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7104
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:02 pm
Location: naked
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ingle Farm

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby Dutchy » Wed Aug 01, 2007 9:28 pm

Blue Boy wrote:Sellar is there development player - but I would like to see him playing now as well.


Sellar cant get a game at the Bays!!
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46250
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2648 times
Been liked: 4313 times

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby sydney-dog » Wed Aug 01, 2007 9:50 pm

Gill - Ideal HF, has height, speed and agility, just needs to clean up his kicking

Sellar, the crows don't have a good record with their first round picks, this I had no expectations at AFL level, however I expected his form to be much better at SANFL level, next year, he needs to put pressure on the selectors, this needs to start with a massive pre-season
sydney-dog
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:53 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby NFC » Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:18 pm

Dutchy wrote:
Blue Boy wrote:Sellar is there development player - but I would like to see him playing now as well.


Sellar cant get a game at the Bays!!

He's an 18 y/o stuggling with OP, no surprise he's in and out of their team.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby Dutchy » Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:51 pm

NFC wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Blue Boy wrote:Sellar is there development player - but I would like to see him playing now as well.


Sellar cant get a game at the Bays!!

He's an 18 y/o stuggling with OP, no surprise he's in and out of their team.


your usual ill informed crap NFC....
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46250
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2648 times
Been liked: 4313 times

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby Dirko » Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:55 pm

your usual ill informed crap NFC....


=D> =D> =D>

He also played down back in the Ressies last week...
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby NFC » Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:13 pm

Dutchy wrote:
NFC wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Blue Boy wrote:Sellar is there development player - but I would like to see him playing now as well.


Sellar cant get a game at the Bays!!

He's an 18 y/o stuggling with OP, no surprise he's in and out of their team.


your usual ill informed crap NFC....

What are you denying?

Not still sour about the rising stars are we? :?
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby Psyber » Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:53 pm

Dutchy wrote:
NFC wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Blue Boy wrote:Sellar is there development player - but I would like to see him playing now as well.


Sellar cant get a game at the Bays!!

He's an 18 y/o stuggling with OP, no surprise he's in and out of their team.


your usual ill informed crap NFC....

Personal insults are a bit over the top Dutchy. You are usually a bit more restrained. :shock:
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby Dutchy » Thu Aug 02, 2007 12:07 am

sorry....your usual ill informed posts NFC...if he is struggling with OP why is he playing at all?...he has been given every opportunity at league level but didnt cut it, I thought he might be our wildcard up forward late this season and still might be
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46250
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2648 times
Been liked: 4313 times

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby NFC » Thu Aug 02, 2007 12:35 am

Dutchy wrote:sorry....your usual ill informed posts NFC...if he is struggling with OP why is he playing at all?...he has been given every opportunity at league level but didnt cut it, I thought he might be our wildcard up forward late this season and still might be

Good question. He was really struggling earlier in the year and when the AFC said he had groin soreness it was pretty much common knowledge he had OP. So yes he is still not 100% and as everyone knows OP can linger on for some time.

He’s kicked 11.4 in 7 league games, and not to mention he’s spent a lot of time rucking and on the bench. There’s no doubt he’s been disappointing this season but there are numerous reasons why.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Next

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 10 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |