blublurag wrote:Over the points. Bring back Rocket. I'm sure there is an explanation.
Was looking forward to rockets response. Considering he was so against any other club making mistakes. Chics lost 8 points and didn't stop that train. However we were pretty Fricken good. Honest mistake by the sounds but going on precedence the league love the power and will throw the book with out listening.
What on earth do you mean without listening?
League will go through every single point with you if you engage before the season.
Think you'll find old Chairman Phil dobbed himself in in 2012 (and needs to watch out for Judge Dart in 2016 if i understand correctly)
blublurag wrote:Over the points. Bring back Rocket. I'm sure there is an explanation.
Was looking forward to rockets response. Considering he was so against any other club making mistakes. Chics lost 8 points and didn't stop that train. However we were pretty Fricken good. Honest mistake by the sounds but going on precedence the league love the power and will throw the book with out listening.
What on earth do you mean without listening?
League will go through every single point with you if you engage before the season.
Think you'll find old Chairman Phil dobbed himself in in 2012 (and needs to watch out for Judge Dart in 2016 if i understand correctly)
I don't get how you can make such a mistake? Aren't the points listed next to the players names on the team sheet? would have thought anyone could add up to 15
blublurag wrote:Over the points. Bring back Rocket. I'm sure there is an explanation.
Was looking forward to rockets response. Considering he was so against any other club making mistakes. Chics lost 8 points and didn't stop that train. However we were pretty Fricken good. Honest mistake by the sounds but going on precedence the league love the power and will throw the book with out listening.
What on earth do you mean without listening?
League will go through every single point with you if you engage before the season.
Think you'll find old Chairman Phil dobbed himself in in 2012 (and needs to watch out for Judge Dart in 2016 if i understand correctly)
I don't get how you can make such a mistake? Aren't the points listed next to the players names on the team sheet? would have thought anyone could add up to 15
From my understanding, a letter was sent to the League for clarification on the allocation of points of a couple of players in the week prior to the first game. No response was given by the league, so the interpretation was that the players were good to go at 2 points instead of 3. That's what I've heard anyway.
From my understanding, there was misinterpretation. It seems they thought that said players were only 2 points instead of 3 points because they played more games for Gepps in 2014 than Jervois in 2015.
Anyhoo, lesson learned, the points have been lost and they had a good win yesterday.
Theyre not the first and probably wont be the last to get it wrong.
Play on, i say...
My new Mantra - I am no longer available to things and people that make me feel like shit
jo172 wrote:Would have thought if you were waiting for clarification you'd at least make a phone call.
Its not like John or Tony are hard to get hold of
Obviously hard enough to not get back to them.
Perhaps you could post a copy of said letter on here for all to see
thought such letter would be confidential between Broadview Football Club and the SAAFL
I would have thought so to TT, but it no longer is Citycoaster has made public the (alleged) existence and contents of the letter, and the events surrounding it. From what he's alleging, he must have got the story from Broadview or he's making it up
Obviously hard enough to not get back to them.[/quote]
Perhaps you could post a copy of said letter on here for all to see[/quote] thought such letter would be confidential between Broadview Football Club and the SAAFL[/quote]
I would have thought so to TT, but it no longer is Citycoaster has made public the (alleged) existence and contents of the letter, and the events surrounding it. From what he's alleging, he must have got the story from Broadview or he's making it up[/quote]
Wouldn't have thought asking for clarification would have been confidential........ Didn't mean to ruffle any feathers, was just trying to shine some light on the situation from what I had heard.
It can get tricky working out the points and the points themselves do not always appear on the team-sheet after they are updated on SP. A couple of areas that can be improved that's for sure. I don't have the answers, just whinging.
Was really impressed with Portland's travelling support on Saturday, more specifically the fact that I saw a majority of their B grade hang around and support the A's. Its never easy to hang around after being on the end of a 20 + goal loss. A few years back our reserves went through a similar patch of being on the end of some hidings so I certainly know how it feels. shows the dedication those lads have to their club.
Out of curiosity, are there many boys playing for Phos that are Plympton High (or whatever the school is called now) old scholars? Similarly, are there many St Michaels old scholars that play for smosh?
Also, what would the policy be for claiming these sorts as 0 pointers? (I can't be bothered reading up the old scholars rules....)
bird of prey wrote:Out of curiosity, are there many boys playing for Phos that are Plympton High (or whatever the school is called now) old scholars? Similarly, are there many St Michaels old scholars that play for smosh?
Also, what would the policy be for claiming these sorts as 0 pointers? (I can't be bothered reading up the old scholars rules....)
Am I correct in thinking that St. Michael's is a collection of schools that come under the same umbrella?
