RB wrote:As a Swans fan, it's most satisfying to see guys like Kennedy, Mattner, McGlynn, Richards etc. do well after being surplus to requirements at other teams.
I think you guys have done well in that area.
RB wrote:As a Swans fan, it's most satisfying to see guys like Kennedy, Mattner, McGlynn, Richards etc. do well after being surplus to requirements at other teams.
JK wrote:Reckon Sydney have been the best "recyclers" for a long time. Players like Lockett, Roos and Schwass came as established stars, but Hall, Bolton, Kennedy, McGlynn, Mumford, Richards, Maxfield etc really found new levels with the Swans.
RB wrote:Throw in Jolly, Schauble, Paul Williams, Jason Ball, and Nick Davis.
stan wrote:JK wrote:Reckon Sydney have been the best "recyclers" for a long time. Players like Lockett, Roos and Schwass came as established stars, but Hall, Bolton, Kennedy, McGlynn, Mumford, Richards, Maxfield etc really found new levels with the Swans.
I dont think Lockett was anymore "recycled" than Buddy and Tippett were.
JK wrote:stan wrote:JK wrote:Reckon Sydney have been the best "recyclers" for a long time. Players like Lockett, Roos and Schwass came as established stars, but Hall, Bolton, Kennedy, McGlynn, Mumford, Richards, Maxfield etc really found new levels with the Swans.
I dont think Lockett was anymore "recycled" than Buddy and Tippett were.
Yeah I kinda said that mate
JK wrote:RB wrote:Throw in Jolly, Schauble, Paul Williams, Jason Ball, and Nick Davis.
Yeah knew there were others, would guess there still is.
bennymacca wrote:Tony Armstrong
heater31 wrote:bennymacca wrote:Tony Armstrong
They improved him and then passed him onto Collingwood....
daysofourlives wrote:What a load of crap, Sydney not even on the same planet when it comes to age compared to 93 Essendon and they were given a chance to win the flag at the start of the year.
No surprise they are better without a certain flog in their team.
Im more than happy to play any team that has "footsteps"Grundy as a key defender.
woodublieve12 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:What a load of crap, Sydney not even on the same planet when it comes to age compared to 93 Essendon and they were given a chance to win the flag at the start of the year.
No surprise they are better without a certain flog in their team.
Im more than happy to play any team that has "footsteps"Grundy as a key defender.
Another quality post by you..
daysofourlives wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:What a load of crap, Sydney not even on the same planet when it comes to age compared to 93 Essendon and they were given a chance to win the flag at the start of the year.
No surprise they are better without a certain flog in their team.
Im more than happy to play any team that has "footsteps"Grundy as a key defender.
Another quality post by you..
I thought so, pretty factual I wouldve thought, Hewett and Papley the only rookies how many did Essendon have?
daysofourlives wrote:sorry i knew i forgot one.
So that was Essendons GF side ave age, what was the sydney figure, im guessing its the entire lists average age not yesterdays team which is whats relevant
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 187 guests