Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Rik E Boy · Post by **Rik E Boy** » Tue Mar 29, 2016 10:24 pm

marbles wrote:
Rik E Boy wrote:Hardly a tragedy LOL

true

whats the word then? if you volunteered ur body to science knowing thered be no way of your results being revealed

and then on the eve of your big big day, some yobbo robbo spills the beans on your team claiming you are possibly a drug user on the national forum

Stiff shit springs to mind.

regards,

REB

BoundaryRider84 · Post by **BoundaryRider84** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:26 am

I know it only round 1,and I'm not be biased. But is there a more versatile ruck combination than Stanley and smith

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:33 am

BoundaryRider84 wrote:I know it only round 1,and I'm not be biased. But is there a more versatile ruck combination than Stanley and smith

You're right - it is only round 1.

bennymacca · Post by **bennymacca** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:39 am

BoundaryRider84 wrote:I know it only round 1,and I'm not be biased. But is there a more versatile ruck combination than Stanley and smith

Tippett Sinclair, Goldstien and nobody would give them a run. But yeah Geelongs rucks are very mobile

BoundaryRider84 · Post by **BoundaryRider84** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:40 am

Spargo wrote:
BoundaryRider84 wrote:I know it only round 1,and I'm not be biased. But is there a more versatile ruck combination than Stanley and smith

You're right - it is only round 1.

Can u not bloody read !!!!!!!!

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:47 am

BoundaryRider84 wrote:I know it only round 1,and I'm not be biased. But is there a more versatile ruck combination than Stanley and smith

Smith will prove to be a very good addition, IMO, throw Blicavs into that mix as the third man / option and it is very mobile.

First time since Ottens that you've had a ruckman I reakon.

BoundaryRider84 · Post by **BoundaryRider84** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:55 am

Booney wrote:
BoundaryRider84 wrote:I know it only round 1,and I'm not be biased. But is there a more versatile ruck combination than Stanley and smith

Smith will prove to be a very good addition, IMO, throw Blicavs into that mix as the third man / option and it is very mobile.

First time since Ottens that you've had a ruckman I reakon.[/quote

McIntosh ;-)

valleys07 · Post by **valleys07** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 12:13 pm

Cats fans would be waiting with baited breath to see if Smith stays on the park.

If both are fit and healthy, then its a handy combination!

stan · Post by **stan** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:46 pm

valleys07 wrote:Cats fans would be waiting with baited breath to see if Smith stays on the park.

If both are fit and healthy, then its a handy combination!

Cats fans would be waiting with baited breath to see if Smith and Stanley stay on the park!!!

Senor Moto Gadili · Post by **Senor Moto Gadili** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:33 pm

stan wrote:
valleys07 wrote:Cats fans would be waiting with baited breath to see if Smith stays on the park.

If both are fit and healthy, then its a handy combination!

Cats fans would be waiting with baited breath to see if Smith and Stanley stay on the park!!!

Vardy injured again and out for 6 weeks, so they have no back up. Let's face it, Hawks rucks were pretty ordinary. Smith had a great first half, but was cooked in second half. Will be interesting to see how they go this week against the big Mummy. I'm still not convinced on the value of having a ruck combination. Most teams are going with just the one ruckman which allows them to play an additional onballer.

Mr Beefy · Post by **Mr Beefy** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:17 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:
marbles wrote:
Rik E Boy wrote:Hardly a tragedy LOL

true

whats the word then? if you volunteered ur body to science knowing thered be no way of your results being revealed

and then on the eve of your big big day, some yobbo robbo spills the beans on your team claiming you are possibly a drug user on the national forum

Stiff shit springs to mind.

regards,

REB

Not sure how factual this is but....

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:34 pm

To be fair to the Hawks they have had a stack of reasons to celebrate!
If I had just won 3 flags in a row I'd be dropping pinga's like tic tacs[emoji1]

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:48 pm

Mr Beefy wrote:
Rik E Boy wrote:
marbles wrote:
Rik E Boy wrote:Hardly a tragedy LOL

true

whats the word then? if you volunteered ur body to science knowing thered be no way of your results being revealed

and then on the eve of your big big day, some yobbo robbo spills the beans on your team claiming you are possibly a drug user on the national forum

Stiff shit springs to mind.

regards,

REB

Not sure how factual this is but....

Not content with 3 flags the bloody Hawks are top of the Coke Premiership table[emoji1]

Mr Beefy · Post by **Mr Beefy** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 7:19 pm

Well they did have more to celebrate than everyone else

JK · Post by JK » Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:03 pm

Pretty damning for the Bombers, they probably only had 4 on their list at that stage

Q. · Post by Q. » Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:09 pm

Mr Beefy wrote:Not sure how factual this is but....

Dayne Beams clearly been a welcome addition to the Brisbane squad

bennymacca · Post by **bennymacca** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:46 pm

looked ok until gold coast were at third bottom

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:50 pm

bennymacca wrote:looked ok until gold coast were at third bottom

Was up on the GC over the weekend and they had a bit on the news explaining that the Suns due to previous troubles had paid for extra tests from their own pockets. Think they had over double the amount of tests as others and had stuff all positive results come back.
Helps that KHunt, Bennell and Dixon have moved on

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:51 pm

JK wrote:Pretty damning for the Bombers, they probably only had 4 on their list at that stage

One of the positive tests is now the Saints problem[emoji1]

Rik E Boy · Post by **Rik E Boy** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 9:16 pm

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:
stan wrote:
valleys07 wrote:Cats fans would be waiting with baited breath to see if Smith stays on the park.

If both are fit and healthy, then its a handy combination!

Cats fans would be waiting with baited breath to see if Smith and Stanley stay on the park!!!

Vardy injured again and out for 6 weeks, so they have no back up. Let's face it, Hawks rucks were pretty ordinary. Smith had a great first half, but was cooked in second half. Will be interesting to see how they go this week against the big Mummy. I'm still not convinced on the value of having a ruck combination. Most teams are going with just the one ruckman which allows them to play an additional onballer.

Some people have short memories. Blix and Stanley flogged Lobbe at the Oval last year and were instrumental in Geelong's victory that night.

regards,

REB

Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Who is online