Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Rik E Boy · Post by **Rik E Boy** » Mon Mar 28, 2016 6:29 pm

daysofourlives wrote:
BoundaryRider84 wrote:All about today. C'mon, The Cats!

Well no its all about the last Saturday of the season, you can have your round 1 wins

Don't mind if we do.

regards,

REB

Yank Man · Post by **Yank Man** » Mon Mar 28, 2016 6:44 pm

locky801 wrote:
Yank Man wrote:I'm not watching the game but checking it out on AFL live, is Dangerfield on 43 possessions. Wow, he is Geelong the greatest team of all, lol.
Not a Cats fan btw.

How many hit the target after half time

Yes, get that, but 43 possessions with a 40% turnover still makes you an elite mid.

Post by **Wedgie** » Mon Mar 28, 2016 6:50 pm

That Danger guy was the difference between a win and loss, anyone knows where he came from, never heard of him before! :lol:

carey · Post by **carey** » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:11 pm

gossipgirl wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
am Bays wrote:That no. 35 for Geelong looks all-right. where'd they get him from??

Good to see the Bays boys going well, Gregson and McCarthy in particular

What's his name, is it Peter Dangerfield ? I like the look of him.

Patrick fumble field he he

Yep 44 fumbles.

If he was still with your mob you would've won Sat night. :lol:

Bandit · Post by **Bandit** » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:16 pm

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:The umpires and these 15m kicks.....are a disgrace.

Earlier kicks that went further were called too short and then Guthrie kicks one 8m.....

Agreed. One kickout (i think enright marked it in 3rd) was at least 20m and called play on. Lucky he was in a bit of space.

carey · Post by **carey** » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:22 pm

Hodge broken arm. That hurts them even more.

valleys07 · Post by **valleys07** » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:48 pm

Wedgie wrote:That Danger guy was the difference between a win and loss, anyone knows where he came from, never heard of him before!

Let's not get carried away, Dean Gore was a huge loss.

Dog_ger2 · Post by **Dog_ger2** » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:49 pm

Patrick played wonderful today.

Crows don't look like they are top 8.

What happened to Freo?...

Bulldogs look the goods early..

Hawks has 7 or 8 out...

Look like a great AFL season in 2016..

Q. · Post by Q. » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:53 pm

Mark Robinson is a scum journo :-/

JK · Post by JK » Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:23 pm

If you're talking about 360 I reckon Robbo's right

stan · Post by **stan** » Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:23 pm

Q. wrote:Mark Robinson is a scum journo :-/

I dislike collingwood but Im with you on this one. Basically Collingwood cant do shit as they seriously dont have the info. Basically Robo can say anything, hide behind his journalist privilege and not reveal his source. Itnis scum journalism no doubt, but really its par for the course.

Q. · Post by Q. » Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:26 pm

stan wrote:
Q. wrote:Mark Robinson is a scum journo :-/

I dislike collingwood but Im with you on this one. Basically Collingwood cant do shit as they seriously dont have the info. Basically Robo can say anything, hide behind his journalist privilege and not reveal his source. Itnis scum journalism no doubt, but really its par for the course.

Have a new level of respect for Chris Scott after he also tore shreds off that drunk.

carey · Post by **carey** » Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:27 pm

I'm in Melbourne with no Fox footy what did robbo say????

mighty_tiger_79 · Post by **mighty_tiger_79** » Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:28 pm

I agree that what Robbo did was a scum act.

Well articulated by the coaches about how they lack control when players' are on holidays.

I wouldn't expect Robbo to get any further insider info from Collibgwood for future articles when he needs it.

Q. · Post by Q. » Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:30 pm

carey wrote:I'm in Melbourne with no Fox footy what did robbo say????

He backtracked from his article mostly

JK · Post by JK » Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:31 pm

Bucks and Scott circled the wagons and took Robbo to task over semantics .. The fact the clubs can't make public comment on it isn't any journalist's fault

Q. · Post by Q. » Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:02 pm

JK wrote:Bucks and Scott circled the wagons and took Robbo to task over semantics .. The fact the clubs can't make public comment on it isn't any journalist's fault

The fact that he guessed numbers and used the highest profile club to grab a headline is his fault though

JK · Post by JK » Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:15 pm

Q. wrote:
JK wrote:Bucks and Scott circled the wagons and took Robbo to task over semantics .. The fact the clubs can't make public comment on it isn't any journalist's fault

The fact that he guessed numbers and used the highest profile club to grab a headline is his fault though

I (personally) don't really see the exact number being relevant .. Whether it's 9,10 or 11 I don't think changes the impact of the story/situation. Like Robbo himself inferred unfortunately Collingwood will carry the can for it, being the only named club, but he couldn't confirm the others so didn't name them. The one area I think Bucks might have had a point was when he suggested that Robbo could have sat on the article for a week until he could confirm/name the others. But I i don see too much wrong with what he's done. Too many bigger issues at play here.

bennymacca · Post by **bennymacca** » Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:21 pm

whufc wrote:Crows lose a close one they should have ended up winning

Geelong win a close one against the best side in the cimp

Round 1 has shown the Danger affect already

One team goes from being a potential top 6 side to an 8 battler while one goes from being a top 8 battler to potential top 4 candidate

Sums it up quite nicely unfortunately

Q. · Post by Q. » Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:22 pm

The number isn't relevant and the club isn't relevant. It's pretty clear he used Collingwood for his own agenda.

The real question is which CEO leaked him the information... Not hard to figure out his source.

Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Re: Round 1....Finally It Is Here

Who is online