oyster wrote:I know its been asked before on here. But why on earth have the SACA singled West Torrens out along with Port and Woodville as a club to get rid of?
It just makes no sense to have West Torrens on the list of 3 to get rid of. It staggers me how the SACA have even considered West Torrens.
WT are probably the most successful club over the last 20 years.
Dead set mate, haven't you read the last 15 pages on this forum?
WT are in the gun because they are broke and they've got a shit ground run by a football club that wants them out.
Their neighbouring clubs are financially sound and have better facilities.
Define 'success'
One premiership in donkeys years
WT produced state players in last 10 yrs - J Smith, K Smith, George
Decent, but if that makes them the most successful club then I'm Japanese. (I'm not).
Yeah they've got good juniors but given they got relocated and inherited other clubs fertile areas and largely ignored country zone boundaries why wouldn't they?
Look at the present on field they've finished in the 12th or 13th in 2 of the last 3 seasons.
They won one game this year and unfortunately it's a bad year to be bad.
Their administration has hit the panic button with both hands because they know they have serious shortcomings.