JK wrote:but the vast part of it was due to a God awful style of football. Norwood's plan became more dour around 2012, but last year reached an appallingly low level that I pray never gets repeated
But still better than under Trevor Hill?
by topsywaldron » Wed Feb 24, 2016 12:47 pm
JK wrote:but the vast part of it was due to a God awful style of football. Norwood's plan became more dour around 2012, but last year reached an appallingly low level that I pray never gets repeated
by JK » Wed Feb 24, 2016 12:52 pm
topsywaldron wrote:JK wrote:but the vast part of it was due to a God awful style of football. Norwood's plan became more dour around 2012, but last year reached an appallingly low level that I pray never gets repeated
But still better than under Trevor Hill?
by VALE PARK » Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:20 pm
by Hazydog » Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:23 pm
cracka wrote:Hazydog wrote:I'm not one to generally support rule changes either - although I welcome capping interchanges with open arms. Willing to have a look at how the out of bonds rule goes.
I'm more staggered at the directive to U-18 coaches. "It comes as the league issues a directive to under-18 coaches to play with new parameters this season including keeping five forwards in the front half of the ground at stoppages, two in the forward 50m, banning tagging or run-with roles as well as the rolling zone and the press."
Good luck adjudicating on some of those facets!! Lunatics running the asylum with those changes.
That was trialled at last years U18 carnival & from reports was very successful. At stoppages players would spread to traditional positions rather than gather around the ball causing the rolling maul we see nowadays
by whufc » Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:25 pm
by Booney » Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:27 pm
VALE PARK wrote:Ken Farmer from North Adelaide would have kicked 17 goals by 3/4 time in some games.
I reckon the crowd loved it.
by JK » Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:29 pm
VALE PARK wrote:Ken Farmer from North Adelaide would have kicked 17 goals by 3/4 time in some games.
by Magellan » Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:37 pm
JK wrote:VALE PARK wrote:Ken Farmer from North Adelaide would have kicked 17 goals by 3/4 time in some games.
Only on his off days
by saintal » Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:41 pm
by Booney » Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:46 pm
by am Bays » Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:31 pm
Booney wrote:So fatigue creates less stoppages? I'd agree with that, numbers seem to back that up. So less rotations, less breaks in play, players become more fatigued.
Can't wait to watch the last half of matches where players are instructed to play keepies-off because they're rooted* and can't run to space. That'll bring people through the gates. If you're 4 goals down with 20 minutes to go in the last quarter, might be hard to mount a comeback if your players are flat footed.
@am bays, what sort of injuries are aligned with fatigue? Hammys? Groins?
by bennymacca » Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:58 pm
cracka wrote:Hazydog wrote:I'm not one to generally support rule changes either - although I welcome capping interchanges with open arms. Willing to have a look at how the out of bonds rule goes.
I'm more staggered at the directive to U-18 coaches. "It comes as the league issues a directive to under-18 coaches to play with new parameters this season including keeping five forwards in the front half of the ground at stoppages, two in the forward 50m, banning tagging or run-with roles as well as the rolling zone and the press."
Good luck adjudicating on some of those facets!! Lunatics running the asylum with those changes.
That was trialled at last years U18 carnival & from reports was very successful. At stoppages players would spread to traditional positions rather than gather around the ball causing the rolling maul we see nowadays
by saintal » Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:20 pm
Booney wrote:In all reality if you have no interest in the SANFL right now the fact teams might kick 3 or 4 more goals per game each is not going to get you through the gate.
by cracka » Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:23 pm
bennymacca wrote:cracka wrote:Hazydog wrote:I'm not one to generally support rule changes either - although I welcome capping interchanges with open arms. Willing to have a look at how the out of bonds rule goes.
I'm more staggered at the directive to U-18 coaches. "It comes as the league issues a directive to under-18 coaches to play with new parameters this season including keeping five forwards in the front half of the ground at stoppages, two in the forward 50m, banning tagging or run-with roles as well as the rolling zone and the press."
Good luck adjudicating on some of those facets!! Lunatics running the asylum with those changes.
That was trialled at last years U18 carnival & from reports was very successful. At stoppages players would spread to traditional positions rather than gather around the ball causing the rolling maul we see nowadays
Would much rather them change an out of bounds rule than implement something like this
by bennymacca » Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:26 pm
by cracka » Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:30 pm
bennymacca wrote:can you imagine someone going for a lead and just about to take a mark and then being called for being out of the zone?
You want it being less like soccer, well that would basically be the off-side rule
by bennymacca » Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:36 pm
by cracka » Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:37 pm
bennymacca wrote:Ah ok.
So its more like when i used to umpire U10s, and if they started crowding around the ball you would stop the game and tell them to spread out
by VALE PARK » Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:54 pm
by FlyingHigh » Wed Feb 24, 2016 6:03 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |