by The Dark Knight » Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:09 pm
by The Dark Knight » Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:18 pm
by norwood8 » Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:18 pm
by Brodlach » Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:20 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:Hastings gone, caught in the deep. 7/179, I don't see us winning this.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by The Dark Knight » Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:21 pm
by RB » Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:21 pm
mal wrote:carey wrote:Jim05 wrote:The No Show!!!!
4/94
Are you surprised?
The BIGgest surprise is it was about 5 minutes after the BIG show was dismissed before Jim posted
Who is the Australian commentator ?
by The Dark Knight » Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:22 pm
Brodlach wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Hastings gone, caught in the deep. 7/179, I don't see us winning this.
Zampa said yesterday that he rates his own batting, time to deliver Zamps
*I rate his batting too FWIW
by stampy » Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:23 pm
by norwood8 » Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:27 pm
by stampy » Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:32 pm
norwood8 wrote:Wade must surely be banished from the national side, so out of form it's not funny.
by Brodlach » Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:35 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by The Dark Knight » Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:36 pm
by Jim05 » Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:44 pm
norwood8 wrote:Wade must surely be banished from the national side, so out of form it's not funny.
by Q. » Mon Feb 08, 2016 7:36 pm
by bennymacca » Mon Feb 08, 2016 7:45 pm
Q. wrote:That Marsh decision was abominable. Whatever happened to benefit of the doubt.
by Jim05 » Mon Feb 08, 2016 10:20 pm
bennymacca wrote:Q. wrote:That Marsh decision was abominable. Whatever happened to benefit of the doubt.
Looked pretty clearly out to me
by Grahaml » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:22 am
by MJ_23 » Tue Feb 09, 2016 1:23 am
Q. wrote:That Marsh decision was abominable. Whatever happened to benefit of the doubt.
by MJ_23 » Tue Feb 09, 2016 1:25 am
Grahaml wrote:The Marsh one isn't about the decision, but the process. If the ICC don't quickly step in and say this was an error in protocol and clamp down on it then we'll have a potential mine field on our hands. I know in the NFL there's a clear difference between how quickly it takes for a replay of a close call to be shown based on whether the call went for or against the home side. I don't think we want to see that in cricket. Either everyone gets to see a replay first, or nobody does. Bet Warner wishes he'd got a replay of his LBW the other day to help with that decision.
by bennymacca » Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:38 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |