carey wrote:How will UK fan handle Milera playing against the dogs?
Its not just UK fan is who frustrated..........................trust me!!
by whufc » Tue Nov 24, 2015 7:15 pm
carey wrote:How will UK fan handle Milera playing against the dogs?
by Bounce of the ball » Tue Nov 24, 2015 7:18 pm
by whufc » Tue Nov 24, 2015 7:38 pm
Bounce of the ball wrote:That's the way it is now . No different , in fact worse , was Callinan.
by RustyCage » Tue Nov 24, 2015 8:07 pm
whufc wrote:Bounce of the ball wrote:That's the way it is now . No different , in fact worse , was Callinan.
The biggest frustration for me is that a SANFL club would have spent 3-5 years developing the kid and now not only do we lose him but he will be used against us, and what compensation does the club really get, nothing that's adequate enough. The other frustrating part is there is ZERO the club could have done to attempt to retain him. In hindsight now the club was better of not playing him in the finals and have played a kid that may have stayed at the club.
by whufc » Tue Nov 24, 2015 8:18 pm
RustyCage wrote:whufc wrote:Bounce of the ball wrote:That's the way it is now . No different , in fact worse , was Callinan.
The biggest frustration for me is that a SANFL club would have spent 3-5 years developing the kid and now not only do we lose him but he will be used against us, and what compensation does the club really get, nothing that's adequate enough. The other frustrating part is there is ZERO the club could have done to attempt to retain him. In hindsight now the club was better of not playing him in the finals and have played a kid that may have stayed at the club.
Retain him after he is drafted do you mean?
by RustyCage » Tue Nov 24, 2015 8:19 pm
by Wedgie » Tue Nov 24, 2015 8:43 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Jim05 » Tue Nov 24, 2015 8:47 pm
Wedgie wrote:Very happy the North boys got drafted interstate, there would be nothing worse than having them play for an enemy in the SANFL.
by RustyCage » Tue Nov 24, 2015 8:49 pm
by whufc » Tue Nov 24, 2015 9:04 pm
RustyCage wrote:Play for Centrals or play for the Crows, hmm, tough choice that one!!
by RustyCage » Tue Nov 24, 2015 9:15 pm
by DOC » Tue Nov 24, 2015 9:21 pm
by RustyCage » Tue Nov 24, 2015 9:22 pm
by DOC » Tue Nov 24, 2015 9:26 pm
by whufc » Tue Nov 24, 2015 10:23 pm
RustyCage wrote:No player who wants to be the best footballer they can be would chose to play at an SANFL club over an AFL club.
by saintal » Tue Nov 24, 2015 10:31 pm
by Mr Beefy » Wed Nov 25, 2015 8:44 am
whufc wrote:Bounce of the ball wrote:That's the way it is now . No different , in fact worse , was Callinan.
The biggest frustration for me is that a SANFL club would have spent 3-5 years developing the kid and now not only do we lose him but he will be used against us, and what compensation does the club really get, nothing that's adequate enough. The other frustrating part is there is ZERO the club could have done to attempt to retain him. In hindsight now the club was better of not playing him in the finals and have played a kid that may have stayed at the club.
by Booney » Wed Nov 25, 2015 8:58 am
Mr Beefy wrote:whufc wrote:Bounce of the ball wrote:That's the way it is now . No different , in fact worse , was Callinan.
The biggest frustration for me is that a SANFL club would have spent 3-5 years developing the kid and now not only do we lose him but he will be used against us, and what compensation does the club really get, nothing that's adequate enough. The other frustrating part is there is ZERO the club could have done to attempt to retain him. In hindsight now the club was better of not playing him in the finals and have played a kid that may have stayed at the club.
Your frustration might be justified, but you are surely not suggesting you don't play your best available side in the finals?
by Jim05 » Wed Nov 25, 2015 9:07 am
Booney wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:whufc wrote:Bounce of the ball wrote:That's the way it is now . No different , in fact worse , was Callinan.
The biggest frustration for me is that a SANFL club would have spent 3-5 years developing the kid and now not only do we lose him but he will be used against us, and what compensation does the club really get, nothing that's adequate enough. The other frustrating part is there is ZERO the club could have done to attempt to retain him. In hindsight now the club was better of not playing him in the finals and have played a kid that may have stayed at the club.
Your frustration might be justified, but you are surely not suggesting you don't play your best available side in the finals?
More so, does he think AFL scouts might have missed him if he hadn't played SANFL finals?
by Mr Beefy » Wed Nov 25, 2015 9:07 am
Booney wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:whufc wrote:Bounce of the ball wrote:That's the way it is now . No different , in fact worse , was Callinan.
The biggest frustration for me is that a SANFL club would have spent 3-5 years developing the kid and now not only do we lose him but he will be used against us, and what compensation does the club really get, nothing that's adequate enough. The other frustrating part is there is ZERO the club could have done to attempt to retain him. In hindsight now the club was better of not playing him in the finals and have played a kid that may have stayed at the club.
Your frustration might be justified, but you are surely not suggesting you don't play your best available side in the finals?
More so, does he think AFL scouts might have missed him if he hadn't played SANFL finals?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |