Why are West Coast bitching about the compensation given? They could not find a spot in their best 22 for their vice captain who was out of contract and they want more than a 2nd round pick? Tell them their dreaming Gill
heater31 wrote:Why are West Coast bitching about the compensation given? They could not find a spot in their best 22 for their vice captain who was out of contract and they want more than a 2nd round pick? Tell them their dreaming Gill
Not to mention Selwood is at the back end of his career - hardly warrants anything more than a 2nd round pick IMO.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
heater31 wrote:Why are West Coast bitching about the compensation given? They could not find a spot in their best 22 for their vice captain who was out of contract and they want more than a 2nd round pick? Tell them their dreaming Gill
Not to mention Selwood is at the back end of his career - hardly warrants anything more than a 2nd round pick IMO.
Some would argue at 25 he's at his peak.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
heater31 wrote:Why are West Coast bitching about the compensation given? They could not find a spot in their best 22 for their vice captain who was out of contract and they want more than a 2nd round pick? Tell them their dreaming Gill
Not to mention Selwood is at the back end of his career - hardly warrants anything more than a 2nd round pick IMO.
Some would argue at 25 he's at his peak.
Without knowing his age I would of assumed he was 30
heater31 wrote:Why are West Coast bitching about the compensation given? They could not find a spot in their best 22 for their vice captain who was out of contract and they want more than a 2nd round pick? Tell them their dreaming Gill
Not to mention Selwood is at the back end of his career - hardly warrants anything more than a 2nd round pick IMO.
Some would argue at 25 he's at his peak.
Am I right in the thinking the clubs don't know what compensation they get for the restricted free agent until after they refuse to match it?
Should they know beforehand to better judge what they want to do?
heater31 wrote:Why are West Coast bitching about the compensation given? They could not find a spot in their best 22 for their vice captain who was out of contract and they want more than a 2nd round pick? Tell them their dreaming Gill
Not to mention Selwood is at the back end of his career - hardly warrants anything more than a 2nd round pick IMO.
Some would argue at 25 he's at his peak.
Am I right in the thinking the clubs don't know what compensation they get for the restricted free agent until after they refuse to match it?
Should they know beforehand to better judge what they want to do?
I believe it is related to the contract he is offered by Geelong and they should be able to tell from that. A $1m contract first round a $400k contract 2nd round etc.
stan wrote:St.kilda and Essendon are at road block now with the Carlsie deal. Probably need a third club now.
Definately We want a first rounder and they are offering a second rounder. They need to trade players/picks to get a first rounder.
Is Carlisle out of contract? If so, if he went the PSD route, would anyone be likely to pick him before the Saints get their crack?
Depending on the price he puts on his head there is a big risk he gets picked up in the PSD. Carlton would take him and we may even draft him just to make a statement. Saints not guaranteed to get him
valleys07 wrote:Following trade proposal mentioned this morning, which could see the Carlisle deal done:
Essendon: Lose- Jake Carlisle Gain- Pick 9
St. Kilda: Lose- Pick 9 Gain- Pick 28, Jake Carlisle
Adelaide: Lose- Picks 9 & 28 Gain- Pick 5
Personally- not a bad deal for all parties concerned, IMO.
Saints wont have a bar of it. We have already offered up Carlisle + pick 23 for their pick 5 and it was rejected. Saints want a pick in the middle of first round at worst remaining
valleys07 wrote:Following trade proposal mentioned this morning, which could see the Carlisle deal done:
Essendon: Lose- Jake Carlisle Gain- Pick 9
St. Kilda: Lose- Pick 9 Gain- Pick 28, Jake Carlisle
Adelaide: Lose- Picks 9 & 28 Gain- Pick 5
Personally- not a bad deal for all parties concerned, IMO.
I think the Crows lose in that. Basically giving up pick 28 to go 4 spots higher in their first pick. Silly.
Disagree. Giving up pick 28 in what is considered a weak draft, to consolidate 2 x 1st round picks, and giving Adelaide a crack at securing highly rated WAFC lad, Aaron Francis.
“Think of me like Yoda, but instead of being little and green I wear suits and I'm awesome. I'm your bro—I'm Broda!”
HOGG Shield 2015 Division I Premiers. HOGG Shield 2017 Premier League Premiers.
Whoops! There you go haha! I didn't realise his age - I was thinking more around the 28-30 mark! 
