Crows 2015

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Thu Oct 01, 2015 9:46 am

Booney wrote:
Spargo wrote:
bennymacca wrote:had a great year last year

Really?

Great?

There are obviously different levels of greatness....

am Bays · Post by **am Bays** » Thu Oct 01, 2015 9:56 am

bennymacca wrote:
Spargo wrote:
Stumps wrote:McKay has 3 more years on contract supposedly of 400K ish

WTF were they thinking???

had a great year last year when he signed the contract and has had a terrible year this year

bennymacca · Post by **bennymacca** » Thu Oct 01, 2015 9:57 am

he had a career best year for him. by his standards it was a good year.

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Thu Oct 01, 2015 10:02 am

bennymacca wrote:he had a career best year for him. by his standards it was a good year.

First it was a great year, now it's a "good" year.
I reckon we can get you down to "mediocre" by midday...

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Thu Oct 01, 2015 10:17 am

Spargo wrote:
bennymacca wrote:he had a career best year for him. by his standards it was a good year.

First it was a great year, now it's a "good" year.
I reckon we can get you down to "mediocre" by midday...

It was only a "good" year, by his standards.

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Thu Oct 01, 2015 10:41 am

bennymacca wrote:he had a career best year for him. by his standards it was a good year.

Then why not give him 2 years with an option?
4 years is a pretty long contract for a middle tier player IMO

bennymacca · Post by **bennymacca** » Thu Oct 01, 2015 10:50 am

Jim05 wrote:
bennymacca wrote:he had a career best year for him. by his standards it was a good year.

Then why not give him 2 years with an option?
4 years is a pretty long contract for a middle tier player IMO

yeah 100% agree with that, especially as he is likely not in our best 22 if we can get crouch back on the park, get one or both of hampton and seedsman, and potentially add up to 3 more players/draft picks in the dangerfield deal

Rik E Boy · Post by **Rik E Boy** » Thu Oct 01, 2015 12:34 pm

bennymacca wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
bennymacca wrote:he had a career best year for him. by his standards it was a good year.

Then why not give him 2 years with an option?
4 years is a pretty long contract for a middle tier player IMO

yeah 100% agree with that, especially as he is likely not in our best 22 if we can get crouch back on the park, get one or both of hampton and seedsman, and potentially add up to 3 more players/draft picks in the dangerfield deal

Have you seen Seedsman play this season? Not sure if he's been injured or not but he has been very ordinary for the majority of this season.

regards,

REB

bennymacca · Post by **bennymacca** » Thu Oct 01, 2015 1:33 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
bennymacca wrote:he had a career best year for him. by his standards it was a good year.

Then why not give him 2 years with an option?
4 years is a pretty long contract for a middle tier player IMO

yeah 100% agree with that, especially as he is likely not in our best 22 if we can get crouch back on the park, get one or both of hampton and seedsman, and potentially add up to 3 more players/draft picks in the dangerfield deal

Have you seen Seedsman play this season? Not sure if he's been injured or not but he has been very ordinary for the majority of this season.

regards,

REB

Havent seen him a lot this season no, but I have seen him play some outstanding games for the pies, but there seems to have been a fair few go past him this year.

Certainly worth a look if we could get him for cheap imo

Gozu · Post by **Gozu** » Mon Oct 05, 2015 3:46 pm

Watching the Slowdown christ how massive is Eddie Hocking now?

carey · Post by **carey** » Mon Oct 05, 2015 3:50 pm

Gozu wrote:Watching the Slowdown christ how massive is Eddie Hocking now?

Fair size.

carey · Post by **carey** » Mon Oct 05, 2015 3:52 pm

McDermott looks sick.

MW · Post by MW » Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:23 am

So sounds like we are going to roll over and take the compo pick. Very disappointing.

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:38 am

MW wrote:So sounds like we are going to roll over and take the compo pick. Very disappointing.

Not surprising.

MW · Post by MW » Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:39 am

Not at all unfortunately

Mr Beefy · Post by **Mr Beefy** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 9:09 am

Just like the crows were posturing by saying they are going to match his offer and want this and that, now it's his turn.

Pistol Pete · Post by **Pistol Pete** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 9:12 am

MW wrote:So sounds like we are going to roll over and take the compo pick. Very disappointing.

Really I haven't read that anywhere or heard it. Ive only heard Conners saying Adelaide should just take it.

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 9:13 am

MW wrote:So sounds like we are going to roll over and take the compo pick. Very disappointing.

No that is what Dangers management wants to happen. Crows need to hold out and get pick 9 plus a player as minimum.

MW · Post by MW » Tue Oct 06, 2015 9:13 am

The likes of Damian Barrett are now running with it and reckon Crows will roll over. To be honest it would not surprise me. Until we actually develop a spine and do something like match an offer or whatever, I expect the worst.

hawks21 · Post by **hawks21** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 9:25 am

MW wrote:The likes of Damian Barrett are now running with it and reckon Crows will roll over. To be honest it would not surprise me. Until we actually develop a spine and do something like match an offer or whatever, I expect the worst.

Is this just their opinion or have they spoken to someone?

I'd rather see us lose him for nothing in the PSD than take the compo!

Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Re: Crows 2015

Who is online