by therisingblues » Fri Sep 25, 2015 7:21 pm
by Dols » Fri Sep 25, 2015 7:57 pm
more like winning is the only reason he is theretherisingblues wrote:Dols.
I couldn't be bothered watching the whole video, but after viewing the first minute I'm assuming that Chad is going to say words to the affect that the Magpies will try and win or whatever, and you think this is irrefutable proof that the Magpies are all about winning flags and not just player development?
Is this correct?
by heater31 » Fri Sep 25, 2015 8:04 pm
Dols wrote:more like winning is the only reason he is theretherisingblues wrote:Dols.
I couldn't be bothered watching the whole video, but after viewing the first minute I'm assuming that Chad is going to say words to the affect that the Magpies will try and win or whatever, and you think this is irrefutable proof that the Magpies are all about winning flags and not just player development?
Is this correct?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
by Jim05 » Fri Sep 25, 2015 8:41 pm
Dols wrote:more like winning is the only reason he is theretherisingblues wrote:Dols.
I couldn't be bothered watching the whole video, but after viewing the first minute I'm assuming that Chad is going to say words to the affect that the Magpies will try and win or whatever, and you think this is irrefutable proof that the Magpies are all about winning flags and not just player development?
Is this correct?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
by Dols » Fri Sep 25, 2015 8:54 pm
sounds like you are talking about your domestic relationship. Nice story[emoji106]Jim05 wrote:Dols wrote:more like winning is the only reason he is theretherisingblues wrote:Dols.
I couldn't be bothered watching the whole video, but after viewing the first minute I'm assuming that Chad is going to say words to the affect that the Magpies will try and win or whatever, and you think this is irrefutable proof that the Magpies are all about winning flags and not just player development?
Is this correct?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So when he gets told from above to take a player off in the last quarter because he has played x ammount of minutes thats fine?
Will Chad play his players in the positions he wants and not what position he is told they must play?
At the end of the day he is just a puppet for the AFL side
by Rising Power » Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:37 pm
Jim05 wrote:Dols wrote:more like winning is the only reason he is theretherisingblues wrote:Dols.
I couldn't be bothered watching the whole video, but after viewing the first minute I'm assuming that Chad is going to say words to the affect that the Magpies will try and win or whatever, and you think this is irrefutable proof that the Magpies are all about winning flags and not just player development?
Is this correct?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So when he gets told from above to take a player off in the last quarter because he has played x ammount of minutes thats fine?
Will Chad play his players in the positions he wants and not what position he is told they must play?
At the end of the day he is just a puppet for the AFL side
by Jim05 » Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:43 pm
Rising Power wrote:You're both right. Winning A grade games is the ultimate imperative.
by Rising Power » Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:57 pm
Jim05 wrote:Rising Power wrote:You're both right. Winning A grade games is the ultimate imperative.
Of course it is and so it should be.
Cornes may say he is there to win but when push comes to shove looking after the A grades fitness and form comes before a B grade win
by Bounce of the ball » Fri Sep 25, 2015 10:36 pm
by twosheds » Sat Sep 26, 2015 3:57 pm
a lier is a typo, your dad not pulling out is a big mistakeDols wrote:are you calling chad a lier?twosheds wrote:Au contraire, the primary focus of the power reserves is to develop players for the league side - not win games of football. Whilst I'm sure the players give their all and try to win; this is not the number 1 directive that will be given to Chad.
What's a "lier" ?
by Spargo » Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:05 pm
by Dols » Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:53 pm
yesterday afternoon??? No posts last night tard.Spargo wrote:In the cold hard light of day, I reckon Dols will think he made a dick of himself with the pathetic shit he posted last night.
by Spargo » Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:00 pm
Dols wrote:yesterday afternoon??? No posts last night tard.Spargo wrote:In the cold hard light of day, I reckon Dols will think he made a dick of himself with the pathetic shit he posted last night.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
by Dols » Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:18 pm
by Spargo » Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:23 pm
Dols wrote:Hardly night and no drinks last night tard. Want to make it personal, I will.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
by Wedgie » Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:50 pm
by Magellan » Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:51 pm
Spargo wrote:1- 7:54pm is night, no refuting.
by Spargo » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:04 pm
Wedgie wrote:Kids, please refrain from the personal comments. They're only for me and fellow Admin and Mods
by Dols » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:06 pm
ok I willSpargo wrote:Dols wrote:Hardly night and no drinks last night tard. Want to make it personal, I will.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1- 7:54pm is night, no refuting.
2- YOU made it personal when you started the name calling with tard.
Maybe you SHOULD have a drink, legend.
by am Bays » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:43 pm
Wedgie wrote:Kids, please refrain from the personal comments. They're only for me and fellow Admin and Mods
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |