CENTURION wrote:FFS, this is soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo tedious.
You started it.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'
FlyingHigh wrote:Good to see the Falcons get over the Royals in WA, setting up a pure GF against Subi.
Was great to see the WAFL stand up to the Eagles also. They applied to get permits for McGinnity and Selwood to play for the Royals today and were declined. Apparantly the commentators on radio were having a whinge about it and claiming the WAFL should be helping West Coast in their quest for a AFL flag
morell wrote:That "cap" money is used to develop players so that they can fit back into the AFL system better, not to win SANFL flags.
Precisely the reason the two teams shouldn't be in the comp.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'
FlyingHigh wrote:Good to see the Falcons get over the Royals in WA, setting up a pure GF against Subi.
Was great to see the WAFL stand up to the Eagles also. They applied to get permits for McGinnity and Selwood to play for the Royals today and were declined. Apparantly the commentators on radio were having a whinge about it and claiming the WAFL should be helping West Coast in their quest for a AFL flag
Good to hear. Can imagine that mentality in WA. Probably think Crowley should have been able to have a run in Peel's u/18's too.
It is hard for me to go to South's annual general meetings as I live in the north east and I don't drive but are the concerns about the AFL teams raised at the club AGMs by members and if so, what are the feedback from the boards?
This seems to be the best forums for members to get their views across as I don't know if this site is Y2k compliance and can handle pages numbers of 4 digits.
I guess we will see the clubs financial performances soon so we will get an idea of the health of the clubs.
SANFL PREMIERSHIPS In the eyes of some or many This list is for the exisisting clubs as of now
NW 30 NA 13 ST 13 SA 11 CD 9 WA 8 GL 4 WWT 3 PR 0 AR 0
A chance for West Adelaide to get to equal 5th with Centrals if they win they win the 2015 GF WWT have the chance to get to equal 7th with Glenelg
It will be a long time before any team passes Norwood That is, unless the old Port Adelaide Magpies of 1870 -2013 reform Just for the record that version of Port Adelaide has 36 premierships
mal wrote:SANFL PREMIERSHIPS In the eyes of some or many This list is for the exisisting clubs as of now
NW 18 ST 13 NA 11 CD 9 WA 8 GL 4 SA 3 WWT 3 PR 0 AR 0
Edited above for accuracy... SANFL was formed in 1907, you can't count the earlier one's. They never used to be counted until some sad case at the Advertiser decided to give Norwood a boost to help them catch up to Port Adelaide.
For the record, I think Port Adelaide (Magpies) would be on 31.
