Round Table

Talk on the national game

Round Table

Postby carey » Tue Jun 02, 2015 9:42 pm

Anyone else watch it?

Great insight in to the mindset of the clubs. Love him or hate him Eddie is an outstanding president IMO.

So many discussions so far I've seen both sides of the argument and can honestly say I don't know who's right or wrong.

Great forum. Really enjoyed it so far.
you've gota keep on keep'n on .........
User avatar
carey
Coach
 
 
Posts: 21076
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: From a place i shouldn't be.
Has liked: 2810 times
Been liked: 3009 times
Grassroots Team: Paralowie

Re: Round Table

Postby woodublieve12 » Wed Jun 03, 2015 8:36 am

5 - 1o years ago he was a great president and if he just focused on that instead of trying to dictate how the league is run he still would be... Now i'd be embarrassed if he ran the club i support.

Kochie wanting to move the GF to sydney, please... Ridiculous...
"Fellas, it’s OK to be in pain. It’s OK to hurt. It’s OK to be sad. It’s no longer OK to suffer in silence."
User avatar
woodublieve12
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17729
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Has liked: 3125 times
Been liked: 2518 times

Re: Round Table

Postby Chuck Wepner » Wed Jun 03, 2015 8:57 am

I'd be happy if Eddie was president of my club. An SCG GF involving the Swans where we've qualified to earn a home game wouldn't be so bad would it? Why not?
I say no to drugs, but they don’t listen.
User avatar
Chuck Wepner
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:59 pm
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 23 times
Grassroots Team: United Yeelanna

Re: Round Table

Postby JK » Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:13 am

People outside of Collingwood won't like him, but all that matters is that Collingwood people do. Eddie is an outstanding president, always has been and still is.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Round Table

Postby Footy Smart » Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:38 am

JK wrote:People outside of Collingwood won't like him, but all that matters is that Collingwood people do. Eddie is an outstanding president, always has been and still is.


Exactly, he doesnt care what people think if him. He always pushes for whats best for Collingwood and stuff the rest.... Isnt that what a President should do? Yeah he carries on a bit on TV and likes his face in the papers, but when it comes to running a profitable football club, there is no better!
User avatar
Footy Smart
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5088
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 1:16 pm
Has liked: 54 times
Been liked: 118 times
Grassroots Team: Modbury

Re: Round Table

Postby Booney » Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:48 am

I think he also has the wider football community in mind. Sure, ultimately his goal is for Collingwood to be the top of the tree but he is also mindful of some clubs having advantages over others...then again, he wouldn't share ANZAC Day, would he? :lol:

All in all every club wants a President like Eddie. Among other things he attracts major brands as sponsors and that cannot be underestimated.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61599
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8192 times
Been liked: 11925 times

Re: Round Table

Postby JK » Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:50 am

He's shrewder than many give him credit for, he has a set of stones, he's connected and he's a Collingwood tragic at heart. Perfect ingredients for a successful president.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Round Table

Postby woodublieve12 » Wed Jun 03, 2015 11:21 am

Booney wrote:I think he also has the wider football community in mind. Sure, ultimately his goal is for Collingwood to be the top of the tree but he is also mindful of some clubs having advantages over others...then again, he wouldn't share ANZAC Day, would he? :lol:

All in all every club wants a President like Eddie. Among other things he attracts major brands as sponsors and that cannot be underestimated.


nah, very happy who we have and had over the past decade
"Fellas, it’s OK to be in pain. It’s OK to hurt. It’s OK to be sad. It’s no longer OK to suffer in silence."
User avatar
woodublieve12
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17729
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Has liked: 3125 times
Been liked: 2518 times

Re: Round Table

Postby Footy Smart » Wed Jun 03, 2015 11:33 am

woodublieve12 wrote:
Booney wrote:I think he also has the wider football community in mind. Sure, ultimately his goal is for Collingwood to be the top of the tree but he is also mindful of some clubs having advantages over others...then again, he wouldn't share ANZAC Day, would he? :lol:

All in all every club wants a President like Eddie. Among other things he attracts major brands as sponsors and that cannot be underestimated.


nah, very happy who we have and had over the past decade


WUB, genuine question. Would the Sydney Swans fill the SCG week in week out if Eddie was Pres? It appears from the oustide (probably a simplistic view), while you have had considerable recent onfield success, the offield side of things is still somewhat below its potential?
User avatar
Footy Smart
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5088
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 1:16 pm
Has liked: 54 times
Been liked: 118 times
Grassroots Team: Modbury

Re: Round Table

Postby woodublieve12 » Wed Jun 03, 2015 11:48 am

Footy Smart wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:
Booney wrote:I think he also has the wider football community in mind. Sure, ultimately his goal is for Collingwood to be the top of the tree but he is also mindful of some clubs having advantages over others...then again, he wouldn't share ANZAC Day, would he? :lol:

All in all every club wants a President like Eddie. Among other things he attracts major brands as sponsors and that cannot be underestimated.


nah, very happy who we have and had over the past decade


WUB, genuine question. Would the Sydney Swans fill the SCG week in week out if Eddie was Pres? It appears from the oustide (probably a simplistic view), while you have had considerable recent onfield success, the offield side of things is still somewhat below its potential?


fair question...
I have no idea...
But considering we get far bigger crowds at our games compared to rugby i feel we are going alright... The club is run exceptionally well, from the bottom up.
The academy is exceptional....
Running at a profit on a yearly basis...
Friday nights crowd wasn't great but we were playing carlton
Membership is at an all time high. somewhere between 45-50k (don't have the exact number on hand).
The biggest problem we have is using anz stadium, shocking venue and even though we pulled round 50k maybe more to the prelim and it looks pretty poor. supporters and players both can stand the place.

in the early/mid 90's we were screwed and from there the club has worked exceptionally hard to get were it is now. Did we get a bit of help, yep... but we have had a sustained growth since then.
"Fellas, it’s OK to be in pain. It’s OK to hurt. It’s OK to be sad. It’s no longer OK to suffer in silence."
User avatar
woodublieve12
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17729
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Has liked: 3125 times
Been liked: 2518 times

Re: Round Table

Postby Footy Smart » Wed Jun 03, 2015 1:46 pm

woodublieve12 wrote:
Footy Smart wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:
Booney wrote:I think he also has the wider football community in mind. Sure, ultimately his goal is for Collingwood to be the top of the tree but he is also mindful of some clubs having advantages over others...then again, he wouldn't share ANZAC Day, would he? :lol:

All in all every club wants a President like Eddie. Among other things he attracts major brands as sponsors and that cannot be underestimated.


nah, very happy who we have and had over the past decade


WUB, genuine question. Would the Sydney Swans fill the SCG week in week out if Eddie was Pres? It appears from the oustide (probably a simplistic view), while you have had considerable recent onfield success, the offield side of things is still somewhat below its potential?


fair question...
I have no idea...
But considering we get far bigger crowds at our games compared to rugby i feel we are going alright... The club is run exceptionally well, from the bottom up.
The academy is exceptional....
Running at a profit on a yearly basis...
Friday nights crowd wasn't great but we were playing carlton
Membership is at an all time high. somewhere between 45-50k (don't have the exact number on hand).
The biggest problem we have is using anz stadium, shocking venue and even though we pulled round 50k maybe more to the prelim and it looks pretty poor. supporters and players both can stand the place.

in the early/mid 90's we were screwed and from there the club has worked exceptionally hard to get were it is now. Did we get a bit of help, yep... but we have had a sustained growth since then.



All valid points, like i said my view was probably to simplistic. I still feel you could be up there with the biggest clubs in the AFL and really dent Rugby even further.
User avatar
Footy Smart
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5088
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 1:16 pm
Has liked: 54 times
Been liked: 118 times
Grassroots Team: Modbury

Re: Round Table

Postby woodublieve12 » Wed Jun 03, 2015 1:56 pm

i think we are smashing rugby there in the attendace part... for example, when we played freo in the qualifying final last year we pulled roughly 40 odd thousand and on that same day there was 3 rugby finals on and the combined crowd totals from those games still didn't add up to the swans game.

in a non football state we are doing very well...
"Fellas, it’s OK to be in pain. It’s OK to hurt. It’s OK to be sad. It’s no longer OK to suffer in silence."
User avatar
woodublieve12
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17729
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Has liked: 3125 times
Been liked: 2518 times

Re: Round Table

Postby Armytank » Wed Jun 03, 2015 2:16 pm

woodublieve12 wrote:i think we are smashing rugby there in the attendace part... for example, when we played freo in the qualifying final last year we pulled roughly 40 odd thousand and on that same day there was 3 rugby finals on and the combined crowd totals from those games still didn't add up to the swans game.

in a non football state we are doing very well...


I was at that game and I would guess that Fremantle had at least 10k supporters who had travelled from interstate. The crowd actually felt close to 50/50 from where I was sitting.
I hate Full Back.....................
User avatar
Armytank
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 732
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:31 pm
Location: Thunder Park
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 21 times
Grassroots Team: Ironbank

Re: Round Table

Postby woodublieve12 » Wed Jun 03, 2015 2:21 pm

Armytank wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:i think we are smashing rugby there in the attendace part... for example, when we played freo in the qualifying final last year we pulled roughly 40 odd thousand and on that same day there was 3 rugby finals on and the combined crowd totals from those games still didn't add up to the swans game.

in a non football state we are doing very well...


I was at that game and I would guess that Fremantle had at least 10k supporters who had travelled from interstate. The crowd actually felt close to 50/50 from where I was sitting.

even so, we are still pulling bigger crowds then rugby and soccer on a regular basis...
"Fellas, it’s OK to be in pain. It’s OK to hurt. It’s OK to be sad. It’s no longer OK to suffer in silence."
User avatar
woodublieve12
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17729
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Has liked: 3125 times
Been liked: 2518 times

Re: Round Table

Postby JK » Wed Jun 03, 2015 2:34 pm

Rugby has the better TV deal though apparently
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Round Table

Postby bennymacca » Wed Jun 03, 2015 2:39 pm

JK wrote:Rugby has the better TV deal though apparently


not true, at least for the current deals.

$1.025b for Rugby
$1.253b for AFL

Article says that the rugby deal doesnt include rights for NZ or Mobile, but its hard to see them adding up to 250m given i think the AFL mobile deal is around 100m

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-21/l ... al/4212336

Having said all of that, there has been murmurings that the NRL are going to bring forward their TV rights deal, effectively trumping the AFL in the next round of bargaining
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 12:22 pm
Has liked: 2253 times
Been liked: 1803 times
Grassroots Team: Freeling

Re: Round Table

Postby JK » Wed Jun 03, 2015 2:47 pm

Ah ok, I either heard it mentioned on Round Table or SEN this morning, can't remember which. Also didn't pick up whether they were talking about the current deal or the next one. Might have been SEN because Tim Watson was Talking about 2,2m people in NSW living wihin an 11k radius (somewhere near the Rooty Hill club). Think we've really only scratched the surface in NSW and QLD still.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Round Table

Postby bennymacca » Wed Jun 03, 2015 3:00 pm

interesting page on the history of the TV rights for the AFL

The increase from 1998 to today is pretty astounding really.

http://www.worldofwookie.com/aflbusiness/?page_id=522

Timeline of AFL Broadcast Rights

1960 – the VFL rejects an offer of 14,000 pounds to broadcast the last quarter and replays
1971 – Ch2 and Ch7 pay $200,000 a year for 5 years ($1 million) to 1975 (replays)
1976 – Ch2 and Ch7 pay $600,000 a year for 5 years (3 million) to 1980 (replays)
1977 – Ch7 pays $200,000 to broadcast the night series 1977 – First live grand final broadcast, Ch7 pays $100,000 for that and again for the following grand final
1982 – Vic government bans the playing of VFL on Sunday
1985 – Ch7 pay 3.5 million for 1986 tv rights
1986 – Ch7 offer 2.7 million for 1987 season, offer rejected by the VFL
1986 – Broadcoms offer is accepted after exceeding the 1985 amount, rights onsold to ABC for 1.5 million
1986 – Ch7 rating plummet, offers broadcom 9 million to win rights back
1987 – Ch7 pays $6 million a year ($30 million) for 5 years from 1988 – 1992
1992 – Ch7 pays $17 million a year for 1993 – 1998 (100 million)
1998 – Ch7 Pays $40 million a year for rights to 2001
2001 – Fox, Ch9 and Ch10 pays $500 million for rights for 5 years from 2002-2006, Radio nets the AFl 2 million
2006 – Ch7, Ch10 and Foxtel bid $750 million for 5 years from 2007-2011, Radio nets the AFl 8 million
2011 – Ch7, Foxtel and Telstra bid 1.25 billion for 5 years to 2017. Radio fetches 23.2 million
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 12:22 pm
Has liked: 2253 times
Been liked: 1803 times
Grassroots Team: Freeling

Re: Round Table

Postby Rik E Boy » Wed Jun 03, 2015 4:58 pm

woodublieve12 wrote:
Booney wrote:I think he also has the wider football community in mind. Sure, ultimately his goal is for Collingwood to be the top of the tree but he is also mindful of some clubs having advantages over others...then again, he wouldn't share ANZAC Day, would he? :lol:

All in all every club wants a President like Eddie. Among other things he attracts major brands as sponsors and that cannot be underestimated.


nah, very happy who we have and had over the past decade


Demetriou.
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28572
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1885 times

Re: Round Table

Postby Rik E Boy » Wed Jun 03, 2015 4:59 pm

bennymacca wrote:interesting page on the history of the TV rights for the AFL

The increase from 1998 to today is pretty astounding really.

http://www.worldofwookie.com/aflbusiness/?page_id=522

Timeline of AFL Broadcast Rights

1960 – the VFL rejects an offer of 14,000 pounds to broadcast the last quarter and replays
1971 – Ch2 and Ch7 pay $200,000 a year for 5 years ($1 million) to 1975 (replays)
1976 – Ch2 and Ch7 pay $600,000 a year for 5 years (3 million) to 1980 (replays)
1977 – Ch7 pays $200,000 to broadcast the night series 1977 – First live grand final broadcast, Ch7 pays $100,000 for that and again for the following grand final
1982 – Vic government bans the playing of VFL on Sunday
1985 – Ch7 pay 3.5 million for 1986 tv rights
1986 – Ch7 offer 2.7 million for 1987 season, offer rejected by the VFL
1986 – Broadcoms offer is accepted after exceeding the 1985 amount, rights onsold to ABC for 1.5 million
1986 – Ch7 rating plummet, offers broadcom 9 million to win rights back
1987 – Ch7 pays $6 million a year ($30 million) for 5 years from 1988 – 1992
1992 – Ch7 pays $17 million a year for 1993 – 1998 (100 million)
1998 – Ch7 Pays $40 million a year for rights to 2001
2001 – Fox, Ch9 and Ch10 pays $500 million for rights for 5 years from 2002-2006, Radio nets the AFl 2 million
2006 – Ch7, Ch10 and Foxtel bid $750 million for 5 years from 2007-2011, Radio nets the AFl 8 million
2011 – Ch7, Foxtel and Telstra bid 1.25 billion for 5 years to 2017. Radio fetches 23.2 million



All that money and they can't do better than Dwayne, BT, Jason Dunstall etc.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28572
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1885 times

Next

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |