another grub wrote:Collingwood could see mick was coming to the end of his tenure 7 or 8 years ago and were proven 100% CORRECT.
Given Collingwood's performance since 28/07/2009, when Malthouse was coach, proves that Collingwood and you were/are 100% WRONG!!!
H2H: Buckley 5, Malthouse 0.
Put Buckley at Carlton and Mick at Collingwood and im sure that result would be reversed. Mick left Collingwood in a pretty decent shape. In hindsight Mick should of finished when he left Collingwood
another grub wrote:Collingwood could see mick was coming to the end of his tenure 7 or 8 years ago and were proven 100% CORRECT.
Given Collingwood's performance since 28/07/2009, when Malthouse was coach, proves that Collingwood and you were/are 100% WRONG!!!
H2H: Buckley 5, Malthouse 0.
Put Buckley at Carlton and Mick at Collingwood and im sure that result would be reversed. Mick left Collingwood in a pretty decent shape. In hindsight Mick should of finished when he left Collingwood
Maybe. We can only speculate. Ratten had Carlton in pretty good shape as well.
From my observations, Mick is using outdated tactics. The new breed has him covered and he hasn't bothered to adapt.
Last edited by Q. on Tue May 26, 2015 5:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Q. wrote:You know that's not how it went. Mick wanted out due to personal issues, but then backed away from the arrangements made for him.
He didn't want out of senior coaching
He subsequently wanted to get out of his new "role"
Actually, he did want to step aside from senior coaching, which is why the succession plan was put in place....then he changed his mind and was a dick about it.
I like the way everyone talks about Malthouse like they know him. None of us know the full story and probably never will, He has a great coaching record and he should be congratulated for that.
Carltons list is terrible, Put Clarkson or Lyon coaching that list it's the same result. But something had to give. Even just for the crowd numbers.
And in my opinion Buckley isn't even in the same sentence as Malthouse as a proven coach. He may end up somewhere close but right now no where near.
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Mick 3 flags Buckley 0 and likely to be that way
How long did it take him to get his first?
8, Buckley has 4 years to match it. I think Mick holds the record for longest gap between 2nd and 3rd flag of 16 years, most coaches would of been sacked well before that
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Mick 3 flags Buckley 0 and likely to be that way
How long did it take him to get his first?
8, Buckley has 4 years to match it. I think Mick holds the record for longest gap between 2nd and 3rd flag of 16 years, most coaches would of been sacked well before that
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Mick 3 flags Buckley 0 and likely to be that way
How long did it take him to get his first?
Didn't take him long to get Footscray to third in 1985. The teams that finished ahead of them would flog today's leading sides IMO. Buckley still has a bloody long way to go to match Malthouse for mine.
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Mick 3 flags Buckley 0 and likely to be that way
How long did it take him to get his first?
Didn't take him long to get Footscray to third in 1985. The teams that finished ahead of them would flog today's leading sides IMO. Buckley still has a bloody long way to go to match Malthouse for mine.
regards,
REB
I don't think anyone is actually suggesting Bucks is comparable to any coaching legend at this point.
