Fools Gold wrote:I have no doubt that the club would have done the correct thing here and got the Crows to clear the players
Unfortunately it's not the Crows final say though, they don't run the league . Will be interesting to see how it pans out in any case.
I'm trying to remember if there is a precedent... @Jetters, did something similar happen with Angus Clarke recently?
Norwood league side played the Crows, ressies had the bye, so Gus didnt play another game that weekend.
Which is how all SANFL clubs handle the Reserves bye. Unless the player wants to rest or the medical team has the same opinion then they will be released back to local football. Usually the majority of the Reserves play a game.
Footy Chick wrote:sporting pulse shows no such thing. Investigation was still pending yesterday.
FP have been told it's confirmed which is why the players were informed.
Golden Grove's players were told at training last night they had lost the points so i guess its confirmed
Yeh we got the run down of it last night as well. The saafl were all over it quickly. The call came in to FP Sunday morning at 9am that GG score would be wiped.
Footy Chick wrote:sporting pulse shows no such thing. Investigation was still pending yesterday.
FP have been told it's confirmed which is why the players were informed.
Golden Grove's players were told at training last night they had lost the points so i guess its confirmed
Yeh we got the run down of it last night as well. The saafl were all over it quickly. The call came in to FP Sunday morning at 9am that GG score would be wiped.
Who's WE? (assuming FP) I didn't even realise you were playing back in town
I see the scores have been wiped but womens intuition tells me that this may not be the last we hear of it.
My new Mantra - I am no longer available to things and people that make me feel like shit
Footy Chick wrote: Who's WE? (assuming FP) I didn't even realise you were playing back in town
I see the scores have been wiped but womens intuition tells me that this may not be the last we hear of it.
only the last couple of years!
That's why I knew what happened, we were told about it Sunday, Why won't it be the last we hear of it? The rule is there in black and white!
Nothing here says they broke a rule:
16 SANFL PLAYERS PLAYING IN SAAFL 16.1 A player who is registered in accordance with Clause 10.2 and whom plays for a team competing in the SANFL competition shall not require a transfer to resume playing for the Member Club to whom they are registered provided they have previously been transferred to their Member Club from their immediate last Australian Football club. 16.2 A player who is listed on an SANFL club’s 1 - 35 player list in the current playing season shall submit written permission from his SANFL club to The League prior to him playing for his Member Club. 16.3 When a registered player of a Member Club plays a league or reserves match for an SANFL club, which then has a bye in the following SANFL minor round, such player shall not play (with the exception of The League Under 18’s Divisions) in that round for such player’s Member Club or for any other Member Club unless the player has played a combined minimum total of twenty five (25) or more Senior and Junior matches with such Member Club. (a) The player shall submit written permission from his SANFL Club to The League prior to him playing for his Member Club. (b) Junior football is deemed as matches played from the year in which the player turns 13 years of age. 16.4 On a SANFL bye round, players playing in SANFL Under 18’s may play with their Member Club in any Division after advising in writing and receiving approval from The League prior to him playing for his Member Club. 16.5 An SANFL state match where the SANFL clubs do not play is considered as a SANFL club bye.
16.1 - no transfer needed, resuming playing for existing member club 16.2 - not on 1-35 player list as they are top-up players 16.3 - there was no bye, so this is not relevant 16.4 - not U/18 or bye, so not relevant 16.5 - no state match
Footy Chick wrote: Who's WE? (assuming FP) I didn't even realise you were playing back in town
I see the scores have been wiped but womens intuition tells me that this may not be the last we hear of it.
only the last couple of years!
That's why I knew what happened, we were told about it Sunday, Why won't it be the last we hear of it? The rule is there in black and white!
Nothing here says they broke a rule:
16 SANFL PLAYERS PLAYING IN SAAFL 16.1 A player who is registered in accordance with Clause 10.2 and whom plays for a team competing in the SANFL competition shall not require a transfer to resume playing for the Member Club to whom they are registered provided they have previously been transferred to their Member Club from their immediate last Australian Football club. 16.2 A player who is listed on an SANFL club’s 1 - 35 player list in the current playing season shall submit written permission from his SANFL club to The League prior to him playing for his Member Club. 16.3 When a registered player of a Member Club plays a league or reserves match for an SANFL club, which then has a bye in the following SANFL minor round, such player shall not play (with the exception of The League Under 18’s Divisions) in that round for such player’s Member Club or for any other Member Club unless the player has played a combined minimum total of twenty five (25) or more Senior and Junior matches with such Member Club. (a) The player shall submit written permission from his SANFL Club to The League prior to him playing for his Member Club. (b) Junior football is deemed as matches played from the year in which the player turns 13 years of age. 16.4 On a SANFL bye round, players playing in SANFL Under 18’s may play with their Member Club in any Division after advising in writing and receiving approval from The League prior to him playing for his Member Club. 16.5 An SANFL state match where the SANFL clubs do not play is considered as a SANFL club bye.
16.1 - no transfer needed, resuming playing for existing member club 16.2 - not on 1-35 player list as they are top-up players 16.3 - there was no bye, so this is not relevant 16.4 - not U/18 or bye, so not relevant 16.5 - no state match
Is there another rule?
FE posted this on the last page
Rule 23.30 of the SAAFL Rules
23.30 No Member Club player shall play for any other club prior to or after a match of The League in any one round with the exception of The League’s Under 18 Division matches and any school matches.
Footy Chick wrote: Who's WE? (assuming FP) I didn't even realise you were playing back in town [emoji38]
I see the scores have been wiped but womens intuition tells me that this may not be the last we hear of it.
only the last couple of years!
That's why I knew what happened, we were told about it Sunday, Why won't it be the last we hear of it? The rule is there in black and white!
Nothing here says they broke a rule:
16 SANFL PLAYERS PLAYING IN SAAFL 16.1 A player who is registered in accordance with Clause 10.2 and whom plays for a team competing in the SANFL competition shall not require a transfer to resume playing for the Member Club to whom they are registered provided they have previously been transferred to their Member Club from their immediate last Australian Football club. 16.2 A player who is listed on an SANFL club’s 1 - 35 player list in the current playing season shall submit written permission from his SANFL club to The League prior to him playing for his Member Club. 16.3 When a registered player of a Member Club plays a league or reserves match for an SANFL club, which then has a bye in the following SANFL minor round, such player shall not play (with the exception of The League Under 18’s Divisions) in that round for such player’s Member Club or for any other Member Club unless the player has played a combined minimum total of twenty five (25) or more Senior and Junior matches with such Member Club. (a) The player shall submit written permission from his SANFL Club to The League prior to him playing for his Member Club. (b) Junior football is deemed as matches played from the year in which the player turns 13 years of age. 16.4 On a SANFL bye round, players playing in SANFL Under 18’s may play with their Member Club in any Division after advising in writing and receiving approval from The League prior to him playing for his Member Club. 16.5 An SANFL state match where the SANFL clubs do not play is considered as a SANFL club bye.
16.1 - no transfer needed, resuming playing for existing member club 16.2 - not on 1-35 player list as they are top-up players 16.3 - there was no bye, so this is not relevant 16.4 - not U/18 or bye, so not relevant 16.5 - no state match
Is there another rule?
FE posted this on the last page
Rule 23.30 of the SAAFL Rules
23.30 No Member Club player shall play for any other club prior to or after a match of The League in any one round with the exception of The League’s Under 18 Division matches and any school matches.
In other words dual registered players can't play SAAFL and SANFL in the same weekend. I know it used to happen in the 80's but it's 2015.
Footy Chick wrote: Who's WE? (assuming FP) I didn't even realise you were playing back in town
I see the scores have been wiped but womens intuition tells me that this may not be the last we hear of it.
only the last couple of years!
That's why I knew what happened, we were told about it Sunday, Why won't it be the last we hear of it? The rule is there in black and white!
youre right...its black and white but technically I think they might have a couple of rights to appeal. Not sure itll get them far but theyre still there.
My new Mantra - I am no longer available to things and people that make me feel like shit
. Will be interesting to see how it pans out in any case.
