Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:29 am

3 games to 2 is my guess.

Big Phil · Post by **Big Phil** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:27 am

Booney wrote:3 games to 2 is my guess.

Agreed. Reckon that will be about spot on the money, mate...

Post by **RustyCage** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:53 am

My gut feeling is the tribunal will be very hard on it, definitely wasn't an accident and even though it seems he was just showing the ump what had happened, it wasn't done in a friendly manner. I'm thinking 7-8.

Post by **Wedgie** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:56 am

I'd just give a warning, I wouldn't even call it a push!

johntheclaret · Post by **johntheclaret** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 4:51 pm

Wedgie wrote:I'd just give a warning, I wouldn't even call it a push!

The ump didn't react to it either, or at least didn't appear to.

saintal · Post by **saintal** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 5:26 pm

Deserves a couple of weeks. Not a good look, plus I don't particularly like Moore so I'm biased.

JK · Post by JK » Tue Apr 21, 2015 5:36 pm

2 down to 1 would be fine (just because we have them this weekend)

saintal · Post by **saintal** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:25 pm

3 weeks by the looks of it.

Post by **Wedgie** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 7:06 pm

saintal wrote:3 weeks by the looks of it.

Correct.

Rising Power · Post by **Rising Power** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 7:11 pm

Seems an odd number. Give him either 1 due to minor contact or 8 for breaking the golden rule.

LPH · Post by **LPH** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 7:18 pm

Got 3 games - appeal likely

gadj1976 · Post by **gadj1976** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 7:27 pm

LPH wrote:Got 3 games - appeal likely

Diesel Williams would like to appeal the leniency too.

LPH · Post by **LPH** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 7:35 pm

http://www.portadelaidefc.com.au/news/2 ... l-tribunal

Post by **Dutchy** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:32 pm

Ch9 covered the tribunal live in their news bulletin, of course talking about his potential no availability for the Power this weekend

CUTTERMAN · Post by **CUTTERMAN** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:11 pm

"We get what we deserve"

stan · Post by **stan** » Wed Apr 22, 2015 6:42 am

At the end of the day you can't touch and umpire. We all know this. They are untouchable and there is a reason why. So really probably got what was expected.

on the rails · Post by **on the rails** » Wed Apr 22, 2015 8:27 am

3 weeks seems harsh given the cicumstances in this case?

Hazydog · Post by **Hazydog** » Wed Apr 22, 2015 10:47 am

on the rails wrote:3 weeks seems harsh given the cicumstances in this case?

Agreed - but I'm not sure where you draw the line when it comes to that sort of contact with an umpire. If a more leniant approach is taken this time - how do you judge the next case where contact is ever so slightly more robust, and so on...

It certainly sends a clear message.

Dogwatcher · Post by **Dogwatcher** » Wed Apr 22, 2015 10:50 am

Probably didn't deserve three games, but the tribunal would have felt a message needed to be sent, hence the penalty.

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:31 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:Probably didn't deserve three games, but the tribunal would have felt a message needed to be sent, hence the penalty.

Spot on.

Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Who is online