by DOC » Wed Apr 15, 2015 7:12 pm
by Booney » Thu Apr 16, 2015 7:40 am
by robranisgod » Thu Apr 16, 2015 9:54 am
by RoosterMan » Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:05 pm
robranisgod wrote:We all know that North have easily the best record of any opponent at Alberton. In fact in the last 50 years it is almost a 50/50 result for North and Port at Alberton.
North did win against the odds there last year, but it was later in the year when the Power had more injuries.
by Brendan M » Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:55 pm
by on the rails » Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:10 pm
by DOC » Thu Apr 16, 2015 8:47 pm
by DOC » Thu Apr 16, 2015 8:55 pm
by robranisgod » Thu Apr 16, 2015 9:13 pm
Brendan M wrote:We all know that North have easily the best record of any opponent at Alberton. In fact in the last 50 years it is almost a 50/50 result for North and Port at Alberton.
North did win against the odds there last year, but it was later in the year when the Power had more injuries.
Re; statement above - overall win:loss Port v Eagles is 35:34 favouring Port - don't have records in front of me but wins at Alberton not uncommon for Eagles over past 20 years. Having said that, go North!
by Jim05 » Thu Apr 16, 2015 9:28 pm
by Wedgie » Thu Apr 16, 2015 10:25 pm
Jim05 wrote:Port by 60+, way too good.
Hopefully North can do the comp a few favours and take out a few behind play
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by JK » Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am
by johntheclaret » Fri Apr 17, 2015 9:20 am
DOC wrote:Reserves only fixture hence the time.
Port wont have the luxury of 18 AFL players like last week. Only got 17. Poor loves.
North were abused over the line last week and can not be allowed to win given their ammo status wit the worlds ugliest man.
My tip: If twenty North supporters turn up it will double the average IQ at the ground.
by johntheclaret » Fri Apr 17, 2015 9:27 am
by southee » Fri Apr 17, 2015 10:37 am
DOC wrote:Port by 15 goals, Should not lose a game all year.
by ChickCock » Sat Apr 18, 2015 12:19 pm
by sjt » Sat Apr 18, 2015 12:31 pm
JK wrote:Didn't think Port were allowed players that had been on another state teams list within two seasons .. Regardless, hope Luke Wilson goes alright.
by Tech1 » Sat Apr 18, 2015 12:46 pm
sjt wrote:JK wrote:Didn't think Port were allowed players that had been on another state teams list within two seasons .. Regardless, hope Luke Wilson goes alright.
There is no rules for port power reserves anymore.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |