by Dogwatcher » Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:04 pm
by Brumbies » Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:12 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Interesting read.
I think Brahma Lodge is entirely guilty.
Did anything follow that other complaint about them?
by Dogwatcher » Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:17 pm
by Trader » Tue Mar 17, 2015 11:46 am
one of our batsmen actually walked off even though he got a stumping decision in his favour by the leg umpire
our scoring was perfect with not even a single run discrepancy.
by human_torpedo » Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:29 pm
by tedbullpit » Tue Mar 17, 2015 4:05 pm
human_torpedo wrote:Any news on a resolution to the ICC v BL case? Hopefully soon since it affects finals positions
by human_torpedo » Wed Mar 18, 2015 7:47 am
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Mar 18, 2015 8:57 am
human_torpedo wrote:I'd love to know what actually happened. Its weird how ICC appeared to want to play on, but BL pulled stumps and went off, they get awarded the game? Obviously im only going by that rather humorous recounting of things in the captains report, but still i'd like to know how the ATCA came to the conclusion that Brahma get awarded the game
by Dogwatcher » Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:21 am
by Dogwatcher » Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:26 am
by Trader » Wed Mar 18, 2015 11:48 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:human_torpedo wrote:I'd love to know what actually happened. Its weird how ICC appeared to want to play on, but BL pulled stumps and went off, they get awarded the game? Obviously im only going by that rather humorous recounting of things in the captains report, but still i'd like to know how the ATCA came to the conclusion that Brahma get awarded the game
I thinks it's a no brainer.
Why would an away team pull up the stumps or walk away while they were none fa chasing a gettable target?
by human_torpedo » Wed Mar 18, 2015 11:49 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:human_torpedo wrote:I'd love to know what actually happened. Its weird how ICC appeared to want to play on, but BL pulled stumps and went off, they get awarded the game? Obviously im only going by that rather humorous recounting of things in the captains report, but still i'd like to know how the ATCA came to the conclusion that Brahma get awarded the game
I thinks it's a no brainer.
Why would an away team pull up the stumps or walk away while they were none fa chasing a gettable target?
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Mar 18, 2015 11:50 am
human_torpedo wrote:
My point exactly. BL had no reason to walk off, but like I said we have only heard ICC's warped side of things, I'd like to know what ACTUALLY happened. I have my theories but I dont want to violate ATCA's 'Social Media policy' which they rammed down us at the Delgates meeting the other week, so I wont slander anyone with my theory
by Tony Clifton » Wed Mar 18, 2015 11:59 am
by human_torpedo » Wed Mar 18, 2015 12:02 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:human_torpedo wrote:
My point exactly. BL had no reason to walk off, but like I said we have only heard ICC's warped side of things, I'd like to know what ACTUALLY happened. I have my theories but I dont want to violate ATCA's 'Social Media policy' which they rammed down us at the Delgates meeting the other week, so I wont slander anyone with my theory
Well at least their scorebook was perfect.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Mar 18, 2015 12:28 pm
human_torpedo wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:human_torpedo wrote:
My point exactly. BL had no reason to walk off, but like I said we have only heard ICC's warped side of things, I'd like to know what ACTUALLY happened. I have my theories but I dont want to violate ATCA's 'Social Media policy' which they rammed down us at the Delgates meeting the other week, so I wont slander anyone with my theory
Well at least their scorebook was perfect.
Thats the silver lining of this while saga. Maybe they thought that was enough to get the points?
by Shark_Hunter » Thu Mar 19, 2015 1:32 pm
by helicopterking » Thu Mar 19, 2015 2:11 pm
Shark_Hunter wrote:ICC are a disgrace. The LO5 game last weekend actually did become physical. The AHOS captain told me of their blatant cheating and aggression throughout the day (and a game earlier in the year where their batting added up to 40 runs more than the bowling and their captain demanded to take the batting score). Heard Jars complaining about them on the radio also.
Now I will admit that AHOS are no angels and indeed have been responsible for some poor behaviour in the past that as a club we have tried to deal with and accepted penalties from ATCA, but the sheer number of complaints about this club surely means ATCA need to look at their removal from the competition.
And yes, we will be putting in a formal complaint to David.
by human_torpedo » Thu Mar 19, 2015 3:14 pm
by Dogwatcher » Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:49 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |