Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Adelaide Footy League Talk
Post Reply

Who will win the D7 Grand Final?

Adelaide Uni
3
5%
Angle Vale
7
13%
Flinders Uni
1
2%
Houghton
28
50%
Mitchell Park
8
14%
Salisbury West
5
9%
St. Pauls
4
7%
 
Total votes: 56

scottroo
League - Best 21
Posts: 2062
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 12:49 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Colonel Light Gardens
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 184 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by scottroo »

Is that confirmed fc
User avatar
Footy Chick
Moderator
Posts: 27021
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:44 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: anywhere I want to be...
Has thanked: 1794 times
Been thanked: 2249 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by Footy Chick »

yeah I believe so Scotty, they've had their one year with one team, just like everyone else.
My new Mantra - I am no longer available to things and people that make me feel like shit
Ye Olde Place Kick
Under 16s
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:35 am
Team: Norwood
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 42 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by Ye Olde Place Kick »

Footy Chick wrote:If blackwood don't bring in another team, they're out.

I don't think Wingies are going to get their two teams either, so that's possibly another 2 gone.


So FC if a club has only 1 team they can't play ammos or can they play in a C grade comp?
User avatar
Cohiba
Reserves
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 41 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by Cohiba »

Ye Olde Place Kick wrote:
Footy Chick wrote:If blackwood don't bring in another team, they're out.

I don't think Wingies are going to get their two teams either, so that's possibly another 2 gone.


So FC if a club has only 1 team they can't play ammos or can they play in a C grade comp?


Same old merry-go-round..... A C Grade comp IMO implies that Clubs who have a "C" grade (or a third team if you like) competes on an equal footing with teams similarly disposed. By definition a single team would represent the Club's as an A grade side irrespective of their capabilities . As such they get to play with big boys in a Division hopefully that reflects their standard. How you measure this....well I'll leave that to some of our "experts"...

That said as I have stated before....if you can't field two teams.......work harder or merge....... :)
User avatar
Footy Chick
Moderator
Posts: 27021
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:44 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: anywhere I want to be...
Has thanked: 1794 times
Been thanked: 2249 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by Footy Chick »

Blackwood have 2 other teams in another comp Cohiiba, do you really think they need to merge?

No, they just need to make up their friggin minds as to which comp they want to play in.

They've had their one year, they can't have their cake and eat it too.

Ye old Place Kick - new rules state that clubs must have 2 sides, if they happen to fall on hard times, they will be given one year with one side to try and rebuild and if they can't produce two teams the following season, they won't be playing in the SAAFL.

All other comps have a minimum teams requirement, it's about time we had one too.
My new Mantra - I am no longer available to things and people that make me feel like shit
cracka
Veteran
Posts: 3961
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:41 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Onkaparinga Valley
Has thanked: 485 times
Been thanked: 633 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by cracka »

Footy Chick wrote:Blackwood have 2 other teams in another comp Cohiiba, do you really think they need to merge?

No, they just need to make up their friggin minds as to which comp they want to play in.

They've had their one year, they can't have their cake and eat it too.

Ye old Place Kick - new rules state that clubs must have 2 sides, if they happen to fall on hard times, they will be given one year with one side to try and rebuild and if they can't produce two teams the following season, they won't be playing in the SAAFL.

All other comps have a minimum teams requirement, it's about time we had one too.

Amazingly there isn't an uproar on the SAAFL enforcing this like there is with the HFL country comp.
User avatar
morell
Coach
Posts: 6466
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:56 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Mitchell Park
Has thanked: 2032 times
Been thanked: 1182 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by morell »

Probably because everyone agrees it's fair enough.

Mind you if we want to debate the measurements on how we determine whether or not side will have two teams in February.... then I'm all ears.
User avatar
Cohiba
Reserves
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 41 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by Cohiba »

Footy Chick wrote:Blackwood have 2 other teams in another comp Cohiiba, do you really think they need to merge?

No, they just need to make up their friggin minds as to which comp they want to play in.

They've had their one year, they can't have their cake and eat it too.

Ye old Place Kick - new rules state that clubs must have 2 sides, if they happen to fall on hard times, they will be given one year with one side to try and rebuild and if they can't produce two teams the following season, they won't be playing in the SAAFL.

All other comps have a minimum teams requirement, it's about time we had one too.


No merge required.. agreed...My post wasn't about Blackwood rather my viewpoint to YOPK's comment to you "if a club has only (1) team they can't play ammos or can they play in a C grade comp"?...
cracka
Veteran
Posts: 3961
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:41 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Onkaparinga Valley
Has thanked: 485 times
Been thanked: 633 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by cracka »

morell wrote:Probably because everyone agrees it's fair enough.

Mind you if we want to debate the measurements on how we determine whether or not side will have two teams in February.... then I'm all ears.

So it's fair enough for SAAFL to do it but not HFL or is it fair enough for both comps to do it.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by Q. »

cracka wrote:
morell wrote:Probably because everyone agrees it's fair enough.

Mind you if we want to debate the measurements on how we determine whether or not side will have two teams in February.... then I'm all ears.

So it's fair enough for SAAFL to do it but not HFL or is it fair enough for both comps to do it.


Totally different scenarios. S/C want to field two senior teams, but HFL has forced them to play with only one.
cracka
Veteran
Posts: 3961
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:41 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Onkaparinga Valley
Has thanked: 485 times
Been thanked: 633 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by cracka »

Q. wrote:
cracka wrote:
morell wrote:Probably because everyone agrees it's fair enough.

Mind you if we want to debate the measurements on how we determine whether or not side will have two teams in February.... then I'm all ears.

So it's fair enough for SAAFL to do it but not HFL or is it fair enough for both comps to do it.


Totally different scenarios. S/C want to field two senior teams, but HFL has forced them to play with only one.

Want to & being able to are 2 different things, I'm sure the 4 SAAFL clubs under the pump want to fill 2 sides also. S/C don't fit the requirements of fielding junior sides & never have the whole time they've been in the HFL.
Old Dog New Tricks
Rookie
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:57 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 6 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by Old Dog New Tricks »

cracka wrote:
morell wrote:Probably because everyone agrees it's fair enough.

Mind you if we want to debate the measurements on how we determine whether or not side will have two teams in February.... then I'm all ears.

So it's fair enough for SAAFL to do it but not HFL or is it fair enough for both comps to do it.


I might have missed a previous post or two but who said it isn't fair for the HFL to do it ?
cracka
Veteran
Posts: 3961
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:41 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Onkaparinga Valley
Has thanked: 485 times
Been thanked: 633 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by cracka »

Old Dog New Tricks wrote:
cracka wrote:
morell wrote:Probably because everyone agrees it's fair enough.

Mind you if we want to debate the measurements on how we determine whether or not side will have two teams in February.... then I'm all ears.

So it's fair enough for SAAFL to do it but not HFL or is it fair enough for both comps to do it.


I might have missed a previous post or two but who said it isn't fair for the HFL to do it ?

See HFL Country div thread.
Ye Olde Place Kick
Under 16s
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:35 am
Team: Norwood
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 42 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by Ye Olde Place Kick »

Footy Chick wrote:Blackwood have 2 other teams in another comp Cohiiba, do you really think they need to merge?

No, they just need to make up their friggin minds as to which comp they want to play in.

They've had their one year, they can't have their cake and eat it too.

Ye old Place Kick - new rules state that clubs must have 2 sides, if they happen to fall on hard times, they will be given one year with one side to try and rebuild and if they can't produce two teams the following season, they won't be playing in the SAAFL.

All other comps have a minimum teams requirement, it's about time we had one too.


thanks
User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:27 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Location: Titan
Has thanked: 295 times
Been thanked: 268 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by marbles »

is there no allowance for blackwood to just put their Cgrade in C1?
adr107
Under 16s
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun May 18, 2014 7:39 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Houghton Districts
Has thanked: 305 times
Been thanked: 83 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by adr107 »

Will Flinders Uni be fielding two teams this year? Any updates on them so far?
finn
League - Best 21
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:21 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide University
Location: adelaide
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 22 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by finn »

marbles wrote:is there no allowance for blackwood to just put their Cgrade in C1?

That doesn't address the one side question though. The safe would need to spell out the reasons as to why one team only is acceptable for Blackwood and not Wingfield for example. This opens a can of worms.
always forgive your enemies...nothing annoys them so much
User avatar
norm11
League - Top 5
Posts: 3300
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 3:37 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: In the bar
Has thanked: 470 times
Been thanked: 53 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by norm11 »

adr107 wrote:Will Flinders Uni be fielding two teams this year? Any updates on them so far?

I'm under the understanding that a few teams have until the 15 th of feb to rego 55 players.
Back to the creek it is.
User avatar
morell
Coach
Posts: 6466
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:56 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Mitchell Park
Has thanked: 2032 times
Been thanked: 1182 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by morell »

55 now? Jeez it keeps going up
adr107
Under 16s
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun May 18, 2014 7:39 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Houghton Districts
Has thanked: 305 times
Been thanked: 83 times
Contact:

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

Post by adr107 »

morell wrote:55 now? Jeez it keeps going up


I thought it was always 55 registered players for the clubs that need to provide proof?
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests