The South Australian Political Landscape

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.
Post Reply
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Booney »

stan wrote:Canoe gaff hurt apparently. Still the libs had the esl and the treasury report as well.


Canoe, Budget, Marshall reminding us to vote Labor, 20 years of back stabbing / in fighting, lack lustre play the man not the ball opposition, is that enough? :lol:

What a joke.

shoe boy wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:
shoe boy wrote:Good bye jimmy , enjoy your latte with Vicki , Steven , and Heidi this morning and blame everyone else .

Maybe you could get on the phone and get some advise from Tony and big Joe.


Maybe you should have stayed at school longer than Year 10 and learnt how to spell.


As I thought a broken promise ! :roll:

:lol:
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62502
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:59 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

but the election result isn't finalised, so until then surely Jimmy can keep posting


but if we are talking broken promises, its hard to get on your high horse if you support labor on any level
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62502
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:59 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

Looks like the Libs have possibly a narrow lead in Fisher
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:but the election result isn't finalised, so until then surely Jimmy can keep posting


but if we are talking broken promises, its hard to get on your high horse if you support labor on any level

Well thats what I was saying, its so close you couldn't call it.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Looks like the Libs have possibly a narrow lead in Fisher

Maybe pre voters voting before the canoe gaff lol.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
Posts: 15328
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:53 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by RustyCage »

Every party in power breaks promises. Sometimes circumstances change making keeping that promise a bad idea. Sometimes the party had no intention of ever keeping that promise. If it's the party you support, you play it down or try to justify it. If it's the other party, you jump up and down about it.
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
Look Good In Leather
League - Best 21
Posts: 2079
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:20 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Christies Beach
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Look Good In Leather »

RustyCage wrote:Every party in power breaks promises. Sometimes circumstances change making keeping that promise a bad idea. Sometimes the party had no intention of ever keeping that promise. If it's the party you support, you play it down or try to justify it. If it's the other party, you jump up and down about it.


I see a lot of that on this forum :)
The Apostle
League - Best 21
Posts: 1702
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:10 pm
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by The Apostle »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Looks like the Libs have possibly a narrow lead in Fisher

http://www.news.com.au/national/south-a ... 7150203356
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

The Apostle wrote:
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Looks like the Libs have possibly a narrow lead in Fisher

http://www.news.com.au/national/south-a ... 7150203356

17 votes in it at the moment. Very likely there will be a recount.
But the libs are right in this. This is huge as if labour win they have a majority without independents.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

21 now in favour of Labor. About 120 postals to go.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

I'll say it again is there a bigger disgrace than Familes SA? Absolute disgrace.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:52 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by bennymacca »

Labor wins by 23 votes. Big reflection on the current performance of the federal government.
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 11:13 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Hahndorf
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Psyber »

bennymacca wrote:Labor wins by 23 votes. Big reflection on the current performance of the federal government.

While ignoring the poor financial performance of the state government (and the former federal government).

What is poor about the current federal government was that they did not present a budget that showed them as hitting the well to do harder than the less well off while trying to sort out the debt, which was central to maintaining the support of the swinging voters. They don't seem to get the importance of that.
(Nor do the SA opposition seem to, as I discussed with S Marshall at a recent Xmas function.)

What is also poor is that so many voters will support (for the gifts) a government, state or federal, that is running up a deficit so high we can't even pay the interest without borrowing even more, or selling our few remaining assets, which makes running a rescue budget while retaining enough support to go on very difficult.

It is the "make someone else pay for what I want" psychology that breeds electing debt prone governments and ultimately leads to the Greek syndrome.
Last edited by Psyber on Sat Dec 13, 2014 7:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
General Soreness
Mini-League
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:58 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Richmond
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by General Soreness »

bennymacca wrote:Labor wins by 23 votes. Big reflection on the current performance of the federal government.

:D correct. The coalition had better get used to seeing Libs losing elections - the average punter out in the real world had had a gutful of Abbott, Hockey, Corbin et all Can't see them winning a 2nd term federally unless they make Turnbull leader - and it has to happen soon.
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:52 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by bennymacca »

Psyber wrote:
bennymacca wrote:Labor wins by 23 votes. Big reflection on the current performance of the federal government.

While ignoring the poor financial performance of the state government (and the former federal government).

What is poor about the current federal government was that they did not present a budget that showed them as hitting the well to do harder than the less well off while trying to sort out the debt, which was central to maintaining the support of the swinging voters. They don't seem to get the importance of that.
(Nor do the SA opposition seem to, as I discussed with S Marshall at a recent Xmas function.)

What is also poor is that so many voters will support (for the gifts) a government, state or federal, that is running up a deficit so high we can't even pay the interest without borrowing even more, or selling our few remaining assets, which makes running a rescue budget while retaining enough support to go on very difficult.

It is the "make someone else pay for what I want" psychology that breeds electing debt prone governments and ultimately leads to the Greek syndrome.


The funny thing is the deficit is still going up!
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

bennymacca wrote:
Psyber wrote:
bennymacca wrote:Labor wins by 23 votes. Big reflection on the current performance of the federal government.

While ignoring the poor financial performance of the state government (and the former federal government).

What is poor about the current federal government was that they did not present a budget that showed them as hitting the well to do harder than the less well off while trying to sort out the debt, which was central to maintaining the support of the swinging voters. They don't seem to get the importance of that.
(Nor do the SA opposition seem to, as I discussed with S Marshall at a recent Xmas function.)

What is also poor is that so many voters will support (for the gifts) a government, state or federal, that is running up a deficit so high we can't even pay the interest without borrowing even more, or selling our few remaining assets, which makes running a rescue budget while retaining enough support to go on very difficult.

It is the "make someone else pay for what I want" psychology that breeds electing debt prone governments and ultimately leads to the Greek syndrome.


The funny thing is the deficit is still going up!

Its called interest.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:52 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by bennymacca »

Um it's a little more than that...
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

bennymacca wrote:Um it's a little more than that...

Well for the state government this is totally there mess and maybe they will look to the short term for a solution and thats to sell of remaining assets. That been SA Water which I believe is not a good idea.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 11:13 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Hahndorf
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Psyber »

stan wrote:
bennymacca wrote: The funny thing is the deficit is still going up!

Its called interest.

The deficit continues to rise because of the interest, and because the ALP and the Greens are determined to not let any legislation through that may change the trend and show up their history of financial incompetence. They also see being able to call the attempts to fix it a failure as more important than leaving behind a massive debt that your kids will have to suffer for.

However, I do agree the Libs could have worked harder to come up with a more palatable package that would have gone over better with the middle ground.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Ruben Carter
Reserves
Posts: 758
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:10 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Westminster OS
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Ruben Carter »

Psyber wrote:
stan wrote:
bennymacca wrote: The funny thing is the deficit is still going up!

Its called interest.

The deficit continues to rise because of the interest, and because the ALP and the Greens are determined to not let any legislation through that may change the trend and show up their history of financial incompetence. They also see being able to call the attempts to fix it a failure as more important than leaving behind a massive debt that your kids will have to suffer for.

However, I do agree the Libs could have worked harder to come up with a more palatable package that would have gone over better with the middle ground.


Really? It's never bothered them before.. Big business is all that concerns that mob. They're happy with a growing underclass as long as there not in it themselves
If you don’t like my words, don’t listen. If you don’t like my appearance, don’t look. If you don’t like my actions, turn your head; It’s as simple as that.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests