topsywaldron wrote:Anyone who follows soccer in Britain (underneath the level dominated by sheiks) would see massive danger signs in this move.
Booney wrote: "in trust"
Your favourite accounting term.....
by am Bays » Mon Nov 24, 2014 12:52 pm
topsywaldron wrote:Anyone who follows soccer in Britain (underneath the level dominated by sheiks) would see massive danger signs in this move.
Booney wrote: "in trust"
by whufc » Mon Nov 24, 2014 12:53 pm
topsywaldron wrote:Anyone who follows football in Britain (underneath the level dominated by sheiks) would see massive danger signs in this move.
by topsywaldron » Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:09 pm
am Bays wrote:edited for accuracytopsywaldron wrote:Anyone who follows soccer in Britain (underneath the level dominated by sheiks) would see massive danger signs in this move.Booney wrote: "in trust"
Your favourite accounting term.....
by topsywaldron » Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:11 pm
whufc wrote:topsywaldron wrote:Anyone who follows football in Britain (underneath the level dominated by sheiks) would see massive danger signs in this move.
Yeah i was only reading the other night how third division Crawley Town were on the brink of folding because of this style venture that went wrong
by am Bays » Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:24 pm
topsywaldron wrote:am Bays wrote:edited for accuracytopsywaldron wrote:Anyone who follows soccer in Britain (underneath the level dominated by sheiks) would see massive danger signs in this move.Booney wrote: "in trust"
Your favourite accounting term.....
Let the grown ups discuss this one.
by Booney » Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:41 pm
am Bays wrote:topsywaldron wrote:am Bays wrote:edited for accuracytopsywaldron wrote:Anyone who follows soccer in Britain (underneath the level dominated by sheiks) would see massive danger signs in this move.Booney wrote: "in trust"
Your favourite accounting term.....
Let the grown ups discuss this one.
But why?
by am Bays » Mon Nov 24, 2014 2:29 pm
Booney wrote:Shhh, we're talking about some Scottish mob on the other side of McBum **** nowhere.
by topsywaldron » Mon Nov 24, 2014 2:35 pm
Booney wrote:Shhh, we're talking about some Scottish mob on the other side of McBum **** nowhere.
by Booney » Mon Nov 24, 2014 3:02 pm
topsywaldron wrote:Booney wrote:Shhh, we're talking about some Scottish mob on the other side of McBum **** nowhere.
Plenty of parallels there as my good friend WHUFC will attest to.
By the way LOL at a Port Magpies supporter discussing another team's assets, ironic really.
by topsywaldron » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:04 pm
Booney wrote:LOL...a Norwood supporter talking about club rooms. Moronic, really.
by johntheclaret » Tue Nov 25, 2014 6:38 pm
topsywaldron wrote:Anyone who follows football in Britain (underneath the level dominated by sheiks) would see massive danger signs in this move.
by stan » Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:44 am
johntheclaret wrote:topsywaldron wrote:Anyone who follows football in Britain (underneath the level dominated by sheiks) would see massive danger signs in this move.
Burnley did it.
Have since bought back the ground. But only thanks to promotion.
by Big Phil » Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:47 am
jumbo20 wrote:How is sturt finances?
by Brodlach » Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:56 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Booney » Wed Nov 26, 2014 9:15 am
Brodlach wrote:West are carrying the burden of past presidents/board mis management. Most of the people there seemed to be heading in the same direction and have the club at heart. The proposal sounds promising. They need to start winning on the ground to improve off the ground. for the first time in a while some former players want to come back and play for the club, Porps,Helbig and Willits. Big season for the club.
Does any other SANFL club own their club rooms and land?
by Brodlach » Wed Nov 26, 2014 9:19 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by silent hour » Wed Nov 26, 2014 10:20 am
Brodlach wrote:Purely the asset. When Football Park is sold off and there is money distributed to the clubs I am guessing that is when West could buy the clubrooms back???
West to lease back the clubrooms from the consortium who inturn recieves the rent. All revenue is kept by West.
by Ronnie » Wed Nov 26, 2014 12:07 pm
silent hour wrote:Brodlach wrote:Purely the asset. When Football Park is sold off and there is money distributed to the clubs I am guessing that is when West could buy the clubrooms back???
West to lease back the clubrooms from the consortium who inturn recieves the rent. All revenue is kept by West.
This might not happen for quite awhile!
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 7133144357
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |