Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
- Footy Chick
- Moderator
- Posts: 27021
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:14 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Location: anywhere I want to be...
- Has thanked: 1794 times
- Been thanked: 2249 times
- Contact:
Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
Fire away.
My new Mantra - I am no longer available to things and people that make me feel like shit
- Look Good In Leather
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 2079
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:20 am
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Christies Beach
- Has thanked: 154 times
- Been thanked: 289 times
- Contact:
- Q.
- Coach
- Posts: 22019
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:46 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Houghton Districts
- Location: El Dorado
- Has thanked: 970 times
- Been thanked: 2397 times
- Contact:
Re: Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
Look Good In Leather wrote:What was consensus on that North Haven King Hit?
Was more of a Queen hit.
-
Dogwatcher
- Coach
- Posts: 29318
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:59 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Elizabeth
- Location: The Bronx
- Has thanked: 1425 times
- Been thanked: 1153 times
- Contact:
-
twobob
- Rookie
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 3:08 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: St Kilda
- Team: Wudinna United
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
- Contact:
Re: Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
Q. wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:What was consensus on that North Haven King Hit?
Was more of a Queen hit.
Hasn't this been gone over enough
- Look Good In Leather
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 2079
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:20 am
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Christies Beach
- Has thanked: 154 times
- Been thanked: 289 times
- Contact:
Re: Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
The Old Fellow wrote:OKC "That is 100% king hit. Sometimes it can be out of character for the person to do, but in the end, has to be penalised. Mind you the tribunal system is so laughable, surprised they got this one right in relation to penalty."
The tribunal system needs to be looked at seriously. They are so inconsistant. I wouldn't say they got this one about right as they someone else 6 matches for spitting.
6 for spitting and only one more for a king kit (didn't see it - only going by what I have heard and read). Neither act has any place in any sport.
Other thing I don't understand is how some get a reduced penalty for being a good boy at the tribunal. If two people are found guilty of the same offence in similar situations they should get the same penalty. If one co-operates with the tribunal and one pays up at the tribunal the later should get an extra penalty, not reduce the first's penalty.
Seems to be the case in most leagues, tribunals are inconsistent.
-
mighty hounds
- Coach
- Posts: 6882
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 5:38 pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 286 times
- Contact:
Re: Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
BOS vs CBC for the first time out of the school comp. Be good to watch.
-
Dogwatcher
- Coach
- Posts: 29318
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:59 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Elizabeth
- Location: The Bronx
- Has thanked: 1425 times
- Been thanked: 1153 times
- Contact:
Re: Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
Look Good In Leather wrote:The Old Fellow wrote:OKC "That is 100% king hit. Sometimes it can be out of character for the person to do, but in the end, has to be penalised. Mind you the tribunal system is so laughable, surprised they got this one right in relation to penalty."
The tribunal system needs to be looked at seriously. They are so inconsistant. I wouldn't say they got this one about right as they someone else 6 matches for spitting.
6 for spitting and only one more for a king kit (didn't see it - only going by what I have heard and read). Neither act has any place in any sport.
Other thing I don't understand is how some get a reduced penalty for being a good boy at the tribunal. If two people are found guilty of the same offence in similar situations they should get the same penalty. If one co-operates with the tribunal and one pays up at the tribunal the later should get an extra penalty, not reduce the first's penalty.
Seems to be the case in most leagues, tribunals are inconsistent.
Go ask in Div 4.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
- Q.
- Coach
- Posts: 22019
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:46 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Houghton Districts
- Location: El Dorado
- Has thanked: 970 times
- Been thanked: 2397 times
- Contact:
Re: Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
twobob wrote:Q. wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:What was consensus on that North Haven King Hit?
Was more of a Queen hit.
Hasn't this been gone over enough
I just want to break free.
-
The Old Fellow
- Rookie
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:44 pm
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Barmera-Monash
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 24 times
- Contact:
Re: Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
Thanks for your support Dogwatcher. At least someone read my post and understood what I was referring to. It seems that the ones from NH don't believe it was a king hit or they are too close to it. If the disputed "king hit" doesn't make my comments legit maybe I should have substituted it with "an unprovoked ( by any prior immediate act) targeted ASSAULT on a player off the ball and out of play".
-
jo172
- Veteran
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:30 pm
- Has thanked: 1248 times
- Been thanked: 750 times
- Contact:
Re: Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
Add head high to the story. They're playing the semantics game with 'king hit' because they're trying to defend what they know to be the indefensible
-
superboot7
- Under 16s
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
- Contact:
Re: Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
NH player who got 7 games got a good result for him I'd say....mate of mine got 8 games and there was no video, no report from any umpire, but got 8 games on a supporters statement who said he saw the alleged hit!! Personally I think a king hit and spitting on a player is deservant of similar games...whilst a hit can be deadly and thatnk god it's unlikely a lot of the time....to spit on someone is the lowest form of human filth. Just my 2 cents
- Lightning McQueen
- Coach
- Posts: 55273
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:13 am
- Location: Radiator Springs
- Has thanked: 4971 times
- Been thanked: 9061 times
- Contact:
Re: Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
Q. wrote:twobob wrote:Q. wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:What was consensus on that North Haven King Hit?
Was more of a Queen hit.
Hasn't this been gone over enough
I just want to break free.
Are you gonna let it all hang out?
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
-
tkr
- Rookie
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 12:52 pm
- Team: West Adelaide
- Team: Greater Western Sydney
- Has thanked: 160 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
- Contact:
Re: Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
superboot7 wrote:NH player who got 7 games got a good result for him I'd say....mate of mine got 8 games and there was no video, no report from any umpire, but got 8 games on a supporters statement who said he saw the alleged hit!! Personally I think a king hit and spitting on a player is deservant of similar games...whilst a hit can be deadly and thatnk god it's unlikely a lot of the time....to spit on someone is the lowest form of human filth. Just my 2 cents
Absolutely agree with what you said about spitting on someone!
- Boosh
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:12 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Team: North Haven
- Has thanked: 256 times
- Been thanked: 192 times
- Contact:
Re: Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
The Old Fellow wrote:Thanks for your support Dogwatcher. At least someone read my post and understood what I was referring to. It seems that the ones from NH don't believe it was a king hit or they are too close to it. If the disputed "king hit" doesn't make my comments legit maybe I should have substituted it with "an unprovoked ( by any prior immediate act) targeted ASSAULT on a player off the ball and out of play".
If you substituted it for unprovoked you would be even further from the truth, the WOS player gave the NH player a cheeky one in the stomach and ran off, something he freely admitted when the NH player rang him to apologise.
For 1000th time this does not justify what he did and I thought it was worth 8 games which I have stated previously.
I have a problem. It's to do with the little man, the squashed-in French man, the naked little squashed up hairy boy! You know! With the hand feet
*I apologise to Hope Valley people in advance, no offence intended
*I apologise to Hope Valley people in advance, no offence intended
- Lightning McQueen
- Coach
- Posts: 55273
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:13 am
- Location: Radiator Springs
- Has thanked: 4971 times
- Been thanked: 9061 times
- Contact:
-
scottroo
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 2062
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 1:19 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Team: North Melbourne
- Team: Colonel Light Gardens
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 184 times
- Contact:
Re: Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
Colonel Light Gardens would like to welcome Mark Donovan as A grade Assistant coach under Matthew Dent. Mark played 116 games for Glenelg including the 1986 Premiership
-
X Runna
- Reserves
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:47 am
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Team: Ingle Farm
- Has thanked: 124 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
- Contact:
Re: Ch9 AFL Division 5 - 2015
scottroo wrote:Colonel Light Gardens would like to welcome Mark Donovan as A grade Assistant coach under Matthew Dent. Mark played 116 games for Glenelg including the 1986 Premiership
Building a very formidable team there Scotty
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests
