Essendon

Talk on the national game
Post Reply
User avatar
dedja
Coach
Posts: 26503
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:10 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 1101 times
Been thanked: 2075 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by dedja »

Unless I'm mistaken it's unprecented that a club hasn't removed a coach because they are afraid of the consequences ... why does Hird seemingly have so much power when other coaches can be flicked at will?

Let's see if Essendon have the balls today to remove him ... I doubt they will.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by Jim05 »

dedja wrote:Unless I'm mistaken it's unprecented that a club hasn't removed a coach because they are afraid of the consequences ... why does Hird seemingly have so much power when other coaches can be flicked at will?

Let's see if Essendon have the balls today to remove him ... I doubt they will.

Half the board are on his side and it seems the majority of players are on his side, including most of the influential ones. Several players are threatening to walk if he is sacked
Still believe he will stay until the outcome of the SC notices is known. Obviously depends on if he is willing to cease court action.
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
Posts: 16794
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:42 am
Team: Sturt
Location: the back blocks
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 1321 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by heater31 »

Jim05 wrote:
dedja wrote:Unless I'm mistaken it's unprecented that a club hasn't removed a coach because they are afraid of the consequences ... why does Hird seemingly have so much power when other coaches can be flicked at will?

Let's see if Essendon have the balls today to remove him ... I doubt they will.

Half the board are on his side and it seems the majority of players are on his side, including most of the influential ones. Several players are threatening to walk if he is sacked
Still believe he will stay until the outcome of the SC notices is known. Obviously depends on if he is willing to cease court action.



How can the Board and Players still support him? He was in charge when this descended into a farce yet they still want him to be back in charge :shock:
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by Jim05 »

Only the players can answer that but I do know that the majority want him to stay and they want him to fight the charges, they just dont want any court action to hold up the players process anymore
User avatar
dedja
Coach
Posts: 26503
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:10 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 1101 times
Been thanked: 2075 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by dedja »

As expected. the Essendon Board show how gutless they are ... :roll:
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by Jim05 »

dedja wrote:As expected. the Essendon Board show how gutless they are ... :roll:

Wouldnt call it gutless, would call it blind faith and devotion. Half the board are well and truly in the Hird camp
User avatar
carey
Coach
Posts: 21519
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:20 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Paralowie
Location: From a place i shouldn't be.
Has thanked: 2963 times
Been thanked: 3162 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by carey »

Jim05 wrote:
dedja wrote:As expected. the Essendon Board show how gutless they are ... :roll:

Wouldnt call it gutless, would call it blind faith and devotion. Half the board are well and truly in the Hird camp


Jim I'm not being a smart ass or anything here but surely you must agree Hird had to go??
you've gota keep on keep'n on .........
User avatar
dedja
Coach
Posts: 26503
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:10 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 1101 times
Been thanked: 2075 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by dedja »

The very strong perception as an outsider is that Hird is only still there because of his legal threats ... no football club can operate effectively in those circumstances.

He is tearing the club apart and must be removed. If the Board don't, and it appears that they won't at the moment, then gutless is an appropriate term.

A football club is a different place of employment than most. yes, everyone still has employment rights, but it is not unusual to sack people and pay their contracts out without the fear of legal recrimination.

Your club is turning into a laughing stock.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by Jim05 »

carey wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
dedja wrote:As expected. the Essendon Board show how gutless they are ... :roll:

Wouldnt call it gutless, would call it blind faith and devotion. Half the board are well and truly in the Hird camp


Jim I'm not being a smart ass or anything here but surely you must agree Hird had to go??

To me he stays until players are proven to have taken banned substances. The minute players are guilty then yes he would have to go.
User avatar
carey
Coach
Posts: 21519
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:20 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Paralowie
Location: From a place i shouldn't be.
Has thanked: 2963 times
Been thanked: 3162 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by carey »

I've heard time and time again that no one is bigger than a club....well I guess that statement just isn't true.
you've gota keep on keep'n on .........
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by Jim05 »

dedja wrote:The very strong perception as an outsider is that Hird is only still there because of his legal threats ... no football club can operate effectively in those circumstances.

He is tearing the club apart and must be removed. If the Board don't, and it appears that they won't at the moment, then gutless is an appropriate term.

A football club is a different place of employment than most. yes, everyone still has employment rights, but it is not unusual to sack people and pay their contracts out without the fear of legal recrimination.

Your club is turning into a laughing stock.

Nothing to do with legal ramifications IMO.
Atleast half a dozen players have told the club they will walk if Hird is sacked. Seems the playing group are influencing the board, which isnt good either.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
Posts: 26503
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:10 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 1101 times
Been thanked: 2075 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by dedja »

Still a laughing stock ... who is actually running the club because the Board certainly isn't.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
carey
Coach
Posts: 21519
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:20 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Paralowie
Location: From a place i shouldn't be.
Has thanked: 2963 times
Been thanked: 3162 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by carey »

Also seen a good one the other day,

There is no 'I' in team, but there is an 'I' in Tania and and 'Me' in James!
you've gota keep on keep'n on .........
kickinit
League - Top 5
Posts: 2997
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:19 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Has thanked: 38 times
Been thanked: 95 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by kickinit »

Jim05 wrote:
carey wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
dedja wrote:As expected. the Essendon Board show how gutless they are ... :roll:

Wouldnt call it gutless, would call it blind faith and devotion. Half the board are well and truly in the Hird camp


Jim I'm not being a smart ass or anything here but surely you must agree Hird had to go??

To me he stays until players are proven to have taken banned substances. The minute players are guilty then yes he would have to go.


The players have been handed SC notices. To be able to hand out those notices they must have the evidence to prove they have taken a banned substance. Hird knows this, Essendon knows this and the players know this. Essendon need to grow some balls and sack the lying cheating dog Hird.
We're on this journey together, One Heart, One Club and they will Never Ever Tear Us Apart.
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by stan »

kickinit wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
carey wrote:
Jim05 wrote:[quote="dedja"]As expected. the Essendon Board show how gutless they are ... :roll:

Wouldnt call it gutless, would call it blind faith and devotion. Half the board are well and truly in the Hird camp


Jim I'm not being a smart ass or anything here but surely you must agree Hird had to go??

To me he stays until players are proven to have taken banned substances. The minute players are guilty then yes he would have to go.


The players have been handed SC notices. To be able to hand out those notices they must have the evidence to prove they have taken a banned substance. Hird knows this, Essendon knows this and the players know this. Essendon need to grow some balls and sack the lying cheating dog Hird.[/quote]
I think the outcome of the SC notices will be the end one way or another for hird. As Jim has said previously and I would tend to agree.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62506
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14199 times
Been thanked: 5168 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

well Hird is just hanging in there

once he gets flicked from the bombers any future involving a footy club is over
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
kickinit
League - Top 5
Posts: 2997
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:19 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Has thanked: 38 times
Been thanked: 95 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by kickinit »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:well Hird is just hanging in there

once he gets flicked from the bombers any future involving a footy club is over


any future involving sport is over
We're on this journey together, One Heart, One Club and they will Never Ever Tear Us Apart.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by Jim05 »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:well Hird is just hanging in there

once he gets flicked from the bombers any future involving a footy club is over

Reckon he is well aware of that.
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62506
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14199 times
Been thanked: 5168 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

And meanwhile james is bringing down the club that he served so wonderfully well as a player.

Bomber looks certain to take up Gold Coast offer.
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
Brodlach
Coach
Posts: 51610
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:18 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Colonel Light Gardens
Location: Unley
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 5254 times
Contact:

Re: Essendon 2014

Post by Brodlach »

From Damien Barrett
"@barrettdamian: Winderlich wants out. Wants fresh start, new club, demoralised by drugs saga. I believe he is not facing show-cause notice @traderadio @AFL"

Age reporting he wants to play at Richmond
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods



2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 221 guests