by Sorry Dude » Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:38 am
by bennymacca » Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:44 am
by Sorry Dude » Tue Aug 12, 2014 11:59 am
bennymacca wrote:fair point, i agree with you.
but for instance, if this was richmond next week and we allowed cotchin or boomer to get 40, that could very well be the difference between a win and a loss. it wasnt this week because rocky was basically playing a lone hand for them (he is really good to watch) but it could matter much more against other teams.
by bennymacca » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:01 pm
Sorry Dude wrote:bennymacca wrote:fair point, i agree with you.
but for instance, if this was richmond next week and we allowed cotchin or boomer to get 40, that could very well be the difference between a win and a loss. it wasnt this week because rocky was basically playing a lone hand for them (he is really good to watch) but it could matter much more against other teams.
I think Cotchin falls under the same category as I mentioned with Rockliff. A lot of his possessions are those little gets coming out of the defensive half, and he doesn't push forward with I50's as often as what his numbers (ave 26.4 disposals) show.
Rebound 50 - ave 2 per game
Inside 50 - ave 3 per game
Goald - 0.9 per game
So while he may get 40 touches, stats show that they aren't always going to be in damaging positions.
by Sorry Dude » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:07 pm
bennymacca wrote:Sorry Dude wrote:bennymacca wrote:fair point, i agree with you.
but for instance, if this was richmond next week and we allowed cotchin or boomer to get 40, that could very well be the difference between a win and a loss. it wasnt this week because rocky was basically playing a lone hand for them (he is really good to watch) but it could matter much more against other teams.
I think Cotchin falls under the same category as I mentioned with Rockliff. A lot of his possessions are those little gets coming out of the defensive half, and he doesn't push forward with I50's as often as what his numbers (ave 26.4 disposals) show.
Rebound 50 - ave 2 per game
Inside 50 - ave 3 per game
Goald - 0.9 per game
So while he may get 40 touches, stats show that they aren't always going to be in damaging positions.
Was more just trying to pick out someone who can be damaging but in a better team. Change that to Martin if you want.
by bennymacca » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:09 pm
by Spargo » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:12 pm
bennymacca wrote: I think we should have a good win, but you can never be sure this season.
by bennymacca » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:13 pm
Spargo wrote:bennymacca wrote: I think we should have a good win, but you can never be sure this season.
Purched up on that fence again I see...
by westcoastpanther » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:15 pm
by bennymacca » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:17 pm
by Spargo » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:18 pm
by bennymacca » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:29 pm
Spargo wrote:Still a chance beleive it or not.
I think we can do it if we win our last 3, but the bulldogs always give us trouble and might beat us. Our record in Tassie is ok so we should beat the crows down there - unless they play well & we don't then we might lose. Melbourne is our last game which I would put down as a certain win unless one of the seasons biggest upsets occurs & it could spell curtains for us.
I just don't know
by bennymacca » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:34 pm
by Rik E Boy » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:44 pm
bennymacca wrote:So how we gonna go this week?
I think in general we match up pretty well against the tigers, and despite their good form I think we should have a good win, but you can never be sure this season.
by Booney » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:46 pm
westcoastpanther wrote:Richmond played Friday night, us Sunday in hot conditions with two left after half time.
West Coast also had an extra days break when they got us.
Worried.....
by Rik E Boy » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:47 pm
Booney wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Richmond played Friday night, us Sunday in hot conditions with two left after half time.
West Coast also had an extra days break when they got us.
Worried.....
Strangely I heard Adelaide had 31 of their 120 allowed interchanges left unused.
You'd think with only two on the bench and the "heat" Sando was whining about they would have used all 120 rotations.
by Jim05 » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:49 pm
Booney wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Richmond played Friday night, us Sunday in hot conditions with two left after half time.
West Coast also had an extra days break when they got us.
Worried.....
Strangely I heard Adelaide had 31 of their 120 allowed interchanges left unused.
You'd think with only two on the bench and the "heat" Sando was whining about they would have used all 120 rotations.
by bennymacca » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:59 pm
Booney wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Richmond played Friday night, us Sunday in hot conditions with two left after half time.
West Coast also had an extra days break when they got us.
Worried.....
Strangely I heard Adelaide had 31 of their 120 allowed interchanges left unused.
You'd think with only two on the bench and the "heat" Sando was whining about they would have used all 120 rotations.
by Booney » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:59 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Booney wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Richmond played Friday night, us Sunday in hot conditions with two left after half time.
West Coast also had an extra days break when they got us.
Worried.....
Strangely I heard Adelaide had 31 of their 120 allowed interchanges left unused.
You'd think with only two on the bench and the "heat" Sando was whining about they would have used all 120 rotations.
I thought Sando raised a good point, but the heat seemed to affect the Lions more than his side.
regards,
REB
by Booney » Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:00 pm
bennymacca wrote:Booney wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Richmond played Friday night, us Sunday in hot conditions with two left after half time.
West Coast also had an extra days break when they got us.
Worried.....
Strangely I heard Adelaide had 31 of their 120 allowed interchanges left unused.
You'd think with only two on the bench and the "heat" Sando was whining about they would have used all 120 rotations.
well pretty hard to make more interchanges when you have less options on the bench, given you usually see double and sometimes triple changes after goals etc.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |