Chuck Wepner wrote:He either has a very low tolerance to pain & discomfort or he's a hypochondriac who loves the attention. Tough? Not even in the same galax y as Joel Selwood.
Sanderson has been really heavily involved with both Selwood and Dangerfield, and said on Monday night that Dangerfield is the most courageous player he has ever seen or coached. It seems an interesting call really, hard to compare to previous generations (some there harder than a cats head) but I'm sure he has a pretty good idea of who belongs in what footy galaxy with these two.
Dangerfield will continue to get banged up until he learns an outside game. He spends more time inside than Selwood who has the ability to be a receiver also. Dangerfield needs to be a better disposal he is going to do that. Does he overplay the knocks? Hard to know, but I'd rather him busting his nut to win the ball and be a little over the top sore, than have him sit back and be second to the pill.
\
Surely they are both equally tough. Why does someone have to be the best all the time. Never seen either of them flinch, not back into a pack, not get the hard ball. Both guns,both as hard as anyone who has played or will play the game
Chuck Wepner wrote:He either has a very low tolerance to pain & discomfort or he's a hypochondriac who loves the attention. Tough? Not even in the same galax y as Joel Selwood.
Sanderson has been really heavily involved with both Selwood and Dangerfield, and said on Monday night that Dangerfield is the most courageous player he has ever seen or coached. It seems an interesting call really, hard to compare to previous generations (some there harder than a cats head) but I'm sure he has a pretty good idea of who belongs in what footy galaxy with these two.
Dangerfield will continue to get banged up until he learns an outside game. He spends more time inside than Selwood who has the ability to be a receiver also. Dangerfield needs to be a better disposal he is going to do that. Does he overplay the knocks? Hard to know, but I'd rather him busting his nut to win the ball and be a little over the top sore, than have him sit back and be second to the pill.
\
Surely they are both equally tough. Why does someone have to be the best all the time. Never seen either of them flinch, not back into a pack, not get the hard ball. Both guns,both as hard as anyone who has played or will play the game
Danger come out of every knock like it just about killed him. Seems to always be right next week though. So was he overstating the initial knock? Or is he just that tough he grits through it and plays again next week?
Danny Southern telling Plugga he's fat, I'd like to see that!
Gutsy - yes tough dunno....just wondering what "painful" injury he will get tomorrow...the crowd will ooohh & aaahh but dont worry - he's always right to play the following week!
I just came upon this thread and had a glance through it. I found myself wondering if it was born of the the old resentment that he was chosen by the Crows when they could have chosen an Ebert...
Psyber wrote:I just came upon this thread and had a glance through it. I found myself wondering if it was born of the the old resentment that he was chosen by the Crows when they could have chosen an Ebert...
Dangerfield is a better player. The crows made the right call in my opinion. As for topic, well each to there own.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
Sando once again fell for the age old trick of playing injured players and it bit him on the arse big time. Dangerfield is a power runner but he looked like he was running up and down on the spot. Thompson was underdone as well and both should have been spelled.
