morell wrote:Cohiba wrote:
Our two M & M,s ..... reminds you bit about the real pair of M & M's.....polar opposites....
You get in the bowl.
Rather have a bowl....
by Cohiba » Wed Jul 09, 2014 3:38 pm
morell wrote:Cohiba wrote:
Our two M & M,s ..... reminds you bit about the real pair of M & M's.....polar opposites....
You get in the bowl.
by Jetters » Wed Jul 09, 2014 3:38 pm
by marbles » Wed Jul 09, 2014 3:50 pm
Jetters wrote:This is the dumbest shit ever. What is been proposed is a minor change, how can so much dibble be written about it?
Marbles your arguments blow and you are the worst salesman of all time. Although in principle your idea is fine.
People from low grade clubs are so fricken sensitive.
It would be best for a number of reasons if it was A v A and C v C.
Marbles you have the issue that this causes an unworkable number of clubs. You either have to have byes, invite new clubs to jump divs or leave clubs stranded. NO ONE LIKES THESE SOLUTIONS. When you think of a different solution, go for it.
Morell, on one hand you say you guys are really C graders and so in reality it is appropriate to play against big club's C grades. But on the other, you say you are actually an A grade side and therefore your existence should be prioritised over the big club's C grades. You can't have your cake and eat it too. A player is a player is a player no matter what club/what standard, you all pay the same subs to the League, the league cares about rate of participation. You all get treated equally as a mere number.
by morell » Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:32 pm
Jetters wrote:Marbles you have the issue that this causes an unworkable number of clubs. You either have to have byes, invite new clubs to jump divs or leave clubs stranded. NO ONE LIKES THESE SOLUTIONS.
NO I DIDNT YOU NUMPTIES! Hahah this is hilarious. You have bought into marbles false strawman Jetters. For **** sake I even clarified this not a page ago:Jetters wrote:Morell, on one hand you say you guys are really C graders and so in reality it is appropriate to play against big club's C grades. But on the other, you say you are actually an A grade side and therefore your existence should be prioritised over the big club's C grades. You can't have your cake and eat it too. A player is a player is a player no matter what club/what standard, you all pay the same subs to the League, the league cares about rate of participation. You all get treated equally as a mere number.
morell wrote:I am not saying any club should be put in front of any other club.
I am saying any clubs survival should be put in front of a C Grade sides right to choose what division they play in and who they play against.
Stop. Dribbling. Shit.
by jo172 » Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:36 pm
marbles wrote:Jetters wrote:This is the dumbest shit ever. What is been proposed is a minor change, how can so much dibble be written about it?
Marbles your arguments blow and you are the worst salesman of all time. Although in principle your idea is fine.
People from low grade clubs are so fricken sensitive.
It would be best for a number of reasons if it was A v A and C v C.
Marbles you have the issue that this causes an unworkable number of clubs. You either have to have byes, invite new clubs to jump divs or leave clubs stranded. NO ONE LIKES THESE SOLUTIONS. When you think of a different solution, go for it.
Morell, on one hand you say you guys are really C graders and so in reality it is appropriate to play against big club's C grades. But on the other, you say you are actually an A grade side and therefore your existence should be prioritised over the big club's C grades. You can't have your cake and eat it too. A player is a player is a player no matter what club/what standard, you all pay the same subs to the League, the league cares about rate of participation. You all get treated equally as a mere number.
thankyou jetters u big equilibrium
ok put it this way, div 7 next year is so far looking like...
Mitchell Park (1 team)
Angle Vale
North Pines
Flinders Uni (1 team)
Wingfield (1 team)
Adelaide Uni Cs to stay?
is there away these battlers can play each other 3 times or 4 times or sum shit?
and lets not write off kilburn from this pack either, which will push another side up to div 6
oh and Blackwood C's are somewhere too? cgrade super league??
i honestly doubt uni would wanna stay in this comp
by marbles » Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:45 pm
jo172 wrote:
Are you saying that if Henley are put in Div 7 next year they will pull their C and D Grades?
by morell » Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:46 pm
by tomo » Wed Jul 09, 2014 5:57 pm
by Look Good In Leather » Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:01 pm
marbles wrote:jo172 wrote:
Are you saying that if Henley are put in Div 7 next year they will pull their C and D Grades?
No mate. Henley C & D are next in line to the div 7 virus. if we are there next year we'll be forfeiting too just like the clubs the virus has already eaten into
Im saying if all C grades went to a super c-grade league, excluding Adelaide Uni, div 7 could possibly look like this...
Mitchell Park (1 team)
Angle Vale
North Pines
Flinders Uni (1 team)
Wingfield (1 team)
Adelaide Uni Cs to stay?
i kind of doubt that Adelaide Uni will want to stay here amongst these minions. wouldnt you agree??
by X Runna » Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:24 pm
tomo wrote:Gee, Henley's D grade must really hate being undefeated for the last two years!!!!
Div 7 is way too hard for them!!!!!
by finn » Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:56 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:marbles wrote:jo172 wrote:
Are you saying that if Henley are put in Div 7 next year they will pull their C and D Grades?
No mate. Henley C & D are next in line to the div 7 virus. if we are there next year we'll be forfeiting too just like the clubs the virus has already eaten into
Im saying if all C grades went to a super c-grade league, excluding Adelaide Uni, div 7 could possibly look like this...
Mitchell Park (1 team)
Angle Vale
North Pines
Flinders Uni (1 team)
Wingfield (1 team)
Adelaide Uni Cs to stay?
i kind of doubt that Adelaide Uni will want to stay here amongst these minions. wouldnt you agree??
Maybe it is time for Uni to split up into two A-grade clubs?
I know it has been considered in the past - they have done it with Monash in VIC
by marbles » Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:56 pm
by marbles » Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:06 pm
by cracka » Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:06 pm
by X Runna » Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:10 pm
by heater31 » Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:41 pm
by Q. » Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:47 pm
by marbles » Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:01 pm
Q. wrote:Another thread?
You raise a good point though, we've got no idea what will happen to some clubs over the next six months. Maybe there will only be enough teams for six divisions?
by Look Good In Leather » Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:16 pm
marbles wrote:Ladies & Gentleman announcing a solution for you all...
This solution is based on 1 club - Kilburn
In observing they are now forfeiting every game, the prospect of them having 2 sides come March 2015 may be very slim. The league wont allow them to stay in Div 4. Theyll have to be removed.
This benefits everyone, 3 sides will have to come up from every division below, and as a result Div 7 will actually list all the clubs who have hit hard times in 2014.
This along with the creation of the C-Grade Super League, every club in the league excluding Kilburn is to benefit from an up-shuffle.
The only dilemma now is that the new Div 7 boys will have to play each other 3 times, and its still not known whether any of them can field 2 teams. Maybe it will have to become a 1 team per club division???....2015z.jpg
Now how do you's all feel about this one???
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |