Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
- Big Phil
- Coach
- Posts: 20316
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:26 am
- Has thanked: 122 times
- Been thanked: 288 times
- Contact:
Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
FULL TIME @ ENVESTRA PARK
LEAGUE - Final Scores
Port - 12.11 = 83
Sturt - 8.15 = 63
Magpies win by 20 points
GOAL KICKERS:
Port - R.Young 4, M.Shaw 3, J.Neade 2, B.Newton, A.Young, H.Slattery 1
Sturt - M.Coad 3, M.Duldig 2, Z.Kirkwood, B.Hansen, A.Kurtze 1
LEAGUE - Final Scores
Port - 12.11 = 83
Sturt - 8.15 = 63
Magpies win by 20 points
GOAL KICKERS:
Port - R.Young 4, M.Shaw 3, J.Neade 2, B.Newton, A.Young, H.Slattery 1
Sturt - M.Coad 3, M.Duldig 2, Z.Kirkwood, B.Hansen, A.Kurtze 1
- pipers
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:05 am
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Adelaide Lutheran
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
Who were Sturt's best?
Kirkwood and Beard?
Again?
Kirkwood and Beard?
Again?
"loyalty is dead"
-
Macca19
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 1961
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:24 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Team: Ports
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
Beard was ordinary. Kirkwood, Greenslade, Harms, Coad were Sturts best.
Young, Shaw, AhChee, Clurey, DBJ best for Port.
Young, Shaw, AhChee, Clurey, DBJ best for Port.
- LPH
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 2455
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:15 am
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Kenilworth
- Location: Craven Cottage
- Has thanked: 541 times
- Been thanked: 326 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
Appeared on TV that the superior fitness of Port Reserves told in the end.
Sturt were very competitive.
Sturt were very competitive.
Stephen Trigg & Rob Chapman are SA Football Patriots
-
SANFLnut
- Reserves
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:36 pm
- Team: West Adelaide
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Happy Valley
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 65 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
Appeared on TV that Port were on the good end of the worst 10 umpiring decisions of the day. Thought they were very stiff from that point of view.
-
CUTTERMAN
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 2966
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:20 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Has thanked: 214 times
- Been thanked: 130 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
The holding the ball interpretation was disgraceful today. Port were caught infront of goal in the 3rd in what was the most obvious decision that could be made but nothing, yet they pay the most ridiculous.
In the end we should've kicked the goals we missed, had our chances and blew it.
For a franchise that has 50k members they aren't very passionate when it comes to going to the game. Pi$$weak.
In the end we should've kicked the goals we missed, had our chances and blew it.
For a franchise that has 50k members they aren't very passionate when it comes to going to the game. Pi$$weak.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
-
matt35
- Under 18s
- Posts: 648
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:20 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Boston
- Location: Darwin
- Has thanked: 513 times
- Been thanked: 51 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
In the end just a case of Port taking their chances when it counted. Really wasn't much in that game all day! Good hard game of Football and both sides should be there deep in to the finals.
What was the crowd there today?
What was the crowd there today?
No Surrender!
-
CUTTERMAN
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 2966
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:20 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Has thanked: 214 times
- Been thanked: 130 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
About 2000 at a guess
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
- topsywaldron
- Veteran
- Posts: 3512
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:46 pm
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 218 times
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
pipers wrote:Who were Sturt's best?
Kirkwood and Beard?
Again?
The death of your football team not stopping you asking pointless questions then.
You know nobody cares about the Maggies anymore don't you?
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'
Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
-
on the rails
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 3147
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:10 am
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 83 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
SANFLnut wrote:Appeared on TV that Port were on the good end of the worst 10 umpiring decisions of the day. Thought they were very stiff from that point of view.
I agree - Sturt were screwed by the appalling AFL bias the umpires in the SANFL are showing. The performance of the maggots today was as bad as their effort last week re the Cows bias vs. the chooks.
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
-
Macca19
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 1961
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:24 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Team: Ports
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
topsywaldron wrote:pipers wrote:Who were Sturt's best?
Kirkwood and Beard?
Again?
The death of your football team not stopping you asking pointless questions then.
You know nobody cares about the Maggies anymore don't you?
You're right. That's why 3/4 of this forum is whinging about Port Adelaide on a weekly basis.
-
CUTTERMAN
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 2966
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:20 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Has thanked: 214 times
- Been thanked: 130 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
Beard, Kirkwood and Watt walked out of the Magpies due to them being turned into a reserves team. They walked out due to the decisions that the PAFC board made that went 100% against what was promised only 2-3 years previous.
If Wingard or Monfries are in The Pimps best are you going to validate that by suggesting they are Sturt players?
I doubt it. You're a flog.
If Wingard or Monfries are in The Pimps best are you going to validate that by suggesting they are Sturt players?
I doubt it. You're a flog.
Last edited by CUTTERMAN on Sun Jun 29, 2014 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
- Rik E Boy
- Coach
- Posts: 28710
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:25 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Geelong
- Location: The Switch
- Has thanked: 1795 times
- Been thanked: 1912 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
Macca19 wrote:topsywaldron wrote:pipers wrote:Who were Sturt's best?
Kirkwood and Beard?
Again?
The death of your football team not stopping you asking pointless questions then.
You know nobody cares about the Maggies anymore don't you?
You're right. That's why 3/4 of this forum is whinging about Port Adelaide on a weekly basis.
Yes but that is whinging about the Power isn't it though.
Regards,
REB
If you are in the Hogg please join the Hogg Shield group - click on link to join https://supercoach.com.au/afl/classic/? ... ode=410870
- southee
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4961
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 1:30 am
- Team: South Adelaide
- Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
- Has thanked: 870 times
- Been thanked: 124 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
Watched this game a TV and must say the umpiring was a disgrace against Sturt.
Some absolutely baffling decisions with hints of AFL influence coming through ....
A big worry of things to come IMO ....
Some absolutely baffling decisions with hints of AFL influence coming through ....
A big worry of things to come IMO ....
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
- RB
- Coach
- Posts: 6639
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:15 pm
- Has thanked: 931 times
- Been thanked: 1392 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
Just you wait till we get 50m pens, substitutes, and Viney-style 3 week suspensions for nothing.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
-
MightyEagles
- Coach
- Posts: 11771
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 4:08 pm
- Team: Eagles
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: United Eagles
- Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
RB wrote:Just you wait till we get 50m pens, substitutes, and Viney-style 3 week suspensions for nothing.
Don't say that, someone from HQ will read this and decide that that is a good idea. SSSSSHH
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
-
CUTTERMAN
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 2966
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:20 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Has thanked: 214 times
- Been thanked: 130 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
Chris MattDermot
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
- maxyoz
- Under 18s
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:23 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Kimba Districts
- Has thanked: 35 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
matt35 wrote:At Macca; Not worth responding to people like topsy who are on a sulk that's now reached nearly 12 months! Oh and I see the umpires are now in on the great AFL conspiracy! Who next?
No Umps in the SANFL
Punk Rooster wrote:I can't believe that a topic that is quite clearly trolling has elicited a 3 page response....
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64099
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8790 times
- Been thanked: 12735 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
CUTTERMAN wrote:Beard, Kirkwood and Watt walked out of the Magpies due to them being turned into a reserves team. They walked out due to the decisions that the PAFC board made that went 100% against what was promised only 2-3 years previous.
If Wingard or Monfries are in The Pimps best are you going to validate that by suggesting they are Sturt players?
I doubt it. You're a flog.
Clubs that voted yes.
Yours.
E.A.D.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
-
kickinit
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 2997
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:49 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Has thanked: 38 times
- Been thanked: 95 times
- Contact:
Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion
Booney wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Beard, Kirkwood and Watt walked out of the Magpies due to them being turned into a reserves team. They walked out due to the decisions that the PAFC board made that went 100% against what was promised only 2-3 years previous.
If Wingard or Monfries are in The Pimps best are you going to validate that by suggesting they are Sturt players?
I doubt it. You're a flog.
Clubs that voted yes.
Yours.
E.A.D.
Booney how dare you say anything bad about the clubs that voted yes. Didn't you know that it is all PAFC fault.
We're on this journey together, One Heart, One Club and they will Never Ever Tear Us Apart.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 305 guests
