Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

All discussions to do with the SANFL
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
Posts: 20316
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:26 am
Has thanked: 122 times
Been thanked: 288 times
Contact:

Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by Big Phil »

FULL TIME @ ENVESTRA PARK

LEAGUE - Final Scores

Port - 12.11 = 83

Sturt - 8.15 = 63

Magpies win by 20 points



GOAL KICKERS:

Port - R.Young 4, M.Shaw 3, J.Neade 2, B.Newton, A.Young, H.Slattery 1

Sturt - M.Coad 3, M.Duldig 2, Z.Kirkwood, B.Hansen, A.Kurtze 1
User avatar
pipers
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1423
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:05 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Adelaide Lutheran
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by pipers »

Who were Sturt's best?

Kirkwood and Beard?

Again?
"loyalty is dead"
Macca19
League - Best 21
Posts: 1961
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:24 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Ports
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 10 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by Macca19 »

Beard was ordinary. Kirkwood, Greenslade, Harms, Coad were Sturts best.

Young, Shaw, AhChee, Clurey, DBJ best for Port.
User avatar
LPH
League - Best 21
Posts: 2455
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:15 am
Team: Collingwood
Team: Kenilworth
Location: Craven Cottage
Has thanked: 541 times
Been thanked: 326 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by LPH »

Appeared on TV that the superior fitness of Port Reserves told in the end.
Sturt were very competitive.
Stephen Trigg & Rob Chapman are SA Football Patriots
SANFLnut
Reserves
Posts: 880
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:36 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Happy Valley
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 65 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by SANFLnut »

Appeared on TV that Port were on the good end of the worst 10 umpiring decisions of the day. Thought they were very stiff from that point of view.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
Posts: 2966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:20 pm
Team: Sturt
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 130 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by CUTTERMAN »

The holding the ball interpretation was disgraceful today. Port were caught infront of goal in the 3rd in what was the most obvious decision that could be made but nothing, yet they pay the most ridiculous.
In the end we should've kicked the goals we missed, had our chances and blew it.
For a franchise that has 50k members they aren't very passionate when it comes to going to the game. Pi$$weak.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
matt35
Under 18s
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:20 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Boston
Location: Darwin
Has thanked: 513 times
Been thanked: 51 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by matt35 »

In the end just a case of Port taking their chances when it counted. Really wasn't much in that game all day! Good hard game of Football and both sides should be there deep in to the finals.

What was the crowd there today?
No Surrender!
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
Posts: 2966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:20 pm
Team: Sturt
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 130 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by CUTTERMAN »

About 2000 at a guess
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:46 pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 218 times

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by topsywaldron »

pipers wrote:Who were Sturt's best?

Kirkwood and Beard?

Again?


The death of your football team not stopping you asking pointless questions then.

You know nobody cares about the Maggies anymore don't you?
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
on the rails
League - Top 5
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:10 am
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 83 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by on the rails »

SANFLnut wrote:Appeared on TV that Port were on the good end of the worst 10 umpiring decisions of the day. Thought they were very stiff from that point of view.


I agree - Sturt were screwed by the appalling AFL bias the umpires in the SANFL are showing. The performance of the maggots today was as bad as their effort last week re the Cows bias vs. the chooks.
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
Macca19
League - Best 21
Posts: 1961
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:24 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Ports
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 10 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by Macca19 »

topsywaldron wrote:
pipers wrote:Who were Sturt's best?

Kirkwood and Beard?

Again?


The death of your football team not stopping you asking pointless questions then.

You know nobody cares about the Maggies anymore don't you?


You're right. That's why 3/4 of this forum is whinging about Port Adelaide on a weekly basis.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
Posts: 2966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:20 pm
Team: Sturt
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 130 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by CUTTERMAN »

Beard, Kirkwood and Watt walked out of the Magpies due to them being turned into a reserves team. They walked out due to the decisions that the PAFC board made that went 100% against what was promised only 2-3 years previous.
If Wingard or Monfries are in The Pimps best are you going to validate that by suggesting they are Sturt players?
I doubt it. You're a flog.
Last edited by CUTTERMAN on Sun Jun 29, 2014 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
Posts: 28710
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:25 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Geelong
Location: The Switch
Has thanked: 1795 times
Been thanked: 1912 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by Rik E Boy »

Macca19 wrote:
topsywaldron wrote:
pipers wrote:Who were Sturt's best?

Kirkwood and Beard?

Again?


The death of your football team not stopping you asking pointless questions then.

You know nobody cares about the Maggies anymore don't you?


You're right. That's why 3/4 of this forum is whinging about Port Adelaide on a weekly basis.


Yes but that is whinging about the Power isn't it though.

Regards,

REB
If you are in the Hogg please join the Hogg Shield group - click on link to join https://supercoach.com.au/afl/classic/? ... ode=410870
User avatar
southee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4961
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 1:30 am
Team: South Adelaide
Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
Has thanked: 870 times
Been thanked: 124 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by southee »

Watched this game a TV and must say the umpiring was a disgrace against Sturt.
Some absolutely baffling decisions with hints of AFL influence coming through ....

A big worry of things to come IMO ....:(
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6639
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:15 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by RB »

Just you wait till we get 50m pens, substitutes, and Viney-style 3 week suspensions for nothing.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
MightyEagles
Coach
Posts: 11771
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 4:08 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: United Eagles
Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 12 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by MightyEagles »

RB wrote:Just you wait till we get 50m pens, substitutes, and Viney-style 3 week suspensions for nothing.


Don't say that, someone from HQ will read this and decide that that is a good idea. SSSSSHH
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
Posts: 2966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:20 pm
Team: Sturt
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 130 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by CUTTERMAN »

Chris MattDermot
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
User avatar
maxyoz
Under 18s
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:23 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Kimba Districts
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 36 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by maxyoz »

matt35 wrote:At Macca; Not worth responding to people like topsy who are on a sulk that's now reached nearly 12 months! Oh and I see the umpires are now in on the great AFL conspiracy! Who next?


No Umps in the SANFL
Punk Rooster wrote:I can't believe that a topic that is quite clearly trolling has elicited a 3 page response....
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8790 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by Booney »

CUTTERMAN wrote:Beard, Kirkwood and Watt walked out of the Magpies due to them being turned into a reserves team. They walked out due to the decisions that the PAFC board made that went 100% against what was promised only 2-3 years previous.
If Wingard or Monfries are in The Pimps best are you going to validate that by suggesting they are Sturt players?
I doubt it. You're a flog.


Clubs that voted yes.

Yours.

E.A.D.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
kickinit
League - Top 5
Posts: 2997
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:49 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Has thanked: 38 times
Been thanked: 95 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

Post by kickinit »

Booney wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:Beard, Kirkwood and Watt walked out of the Magpies due to them being turned into a reserves team. They walked out due to the decisions that the PAFC board made that went 100% against what was promised only 2-3 years previous.
If Wingard or Monfries are in The Pimps best are you going to validate that by suggesting they are Sturt players?
I doubt it. You're a flog.


Clubs that voted yes.

Yours.

E.A.D.


Booney how dare you say anything bad about the clubs that voted yes. Didn't you know that it is all PAFC fault. :lol:
We're on this journey together, One Heart, One Club and they will Never Ever Tear Us Apart.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 305 guests