SAAFL Division 7 2014

Adelaide Footy League Talk
Locked

Who will win the Division 7 Grand Final

Flinders Park
7
13%
Modbury
2
4%
Houghton
10
19%
Flinders Uni
4
7%
North Pines
3
6%
SHOC
1
2%
Smithfield
23
43%
SMOSH West Lakes
0
No votes
Henley
3
6%
Adelaide Uni
1
2%
 
Total votes: 54

User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:57 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Location: Titan
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by marbles »

Bigshow82 wrote:Would points start being a concern for the pines?

Sent from my HTC_PN071 using Tapatalk


points? like in points, grams ounces :)

nah what do u mean?
Bigshow82
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1447
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:22 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by Bigshow82 »

marbles wrote:
Bigshow82 wrote:Would points start being a concern for the pines?

Sent from my HTC_PN071 using Tapatalk


points? like in points, grams ounces :)

nah what do u mean?

no the points system. Even a few returning players would be worth points as they wouldn't have played the required 25 games

Sent from my HTC_PN071 using Tapatalk
User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:57 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Location: Titan
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by marbles »

good point bigshow, can only have so many recruits in one year

be good if the sporting pulse automatically calculates the points per side :)

does the league have to check every team in every grade every week?
Bigshow82
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1447
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:22 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by Bigshow82 »

The league doesn't it's up to each club and I'm sure they know what they are doing. They had 0 carry over points from last year.

Sent from my HTC_PN071 using Tapatalk
Dogwatcher
Coach
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:59 am
Team: Central District
Team: Collingwood
Team: Elizabeth
Location: The Bronx
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by Dogwatcher »

My post was possibly a season too early. :oops:
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:57 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Location: Titan
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by marbles »

Bigshow82 wrote:The league doesn't it's up to each club and I'm sure they know what they are doing. They had 0 carry over points from last year.

Sent from my HTC_PN071 using Tapatalk


so the only ones that know if your playing with too many points, is the club itself, no else externally takes the time to check? :shock:
User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:57 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Location: Titan
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by marbles »

Great win by houton over uni. are all the uni boys in brazil? :)

feeling for smosh boys, 30 goal loss. sure they chose to come to div 7 (if not forced too) but 50 blokes again just want a kick and a catch on a saturday arvo made to play highly tuned paid agraders. what a ridiculous competition :)

seeing wingfield kick 8 goals a great sign must have won a lot of footy contests on the day so keep rising royals
Demon Juke
League - Best 21
Posts: 1970
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:22 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by Demon Juke »

marbles wrote:Great win by houton over uni. are all the uni boys in brazil? :)

feeling for smosh boys, 30 goal loss. sure they chose to come to div 7 (if not forced too) but 50 blokes again just want a kick and a catch on a saturday arvo made to play highly tuned paid agraders. what a ridiculous competition :)

seeing wingfield kick 8 goals a great sign must have won a lot of footy contests on the day so keep rising royals


was told uni had 8 out.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:46 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by Q. »

Demon Juke wrote:
marbles wrote:Great win by houton over uni. are all the uni boys in brazil? :)

feeling for smosh boys, 30 goal loss. sure they chose to come to div 7 (if not forced too) but 50 blokes again just want a kick and a catch on a saturday arvo made to play highly tuned paid agraders. what a ridiculous competition :)

seeing wingfield kick 8 goals a great sign must have won a lot of footy contests on the day so keep rising royals


was told uni had 8 out.


And we were at full strength plus playing a couple of AFL players under different names.
Jetters
Reserves
Posts: 805
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 10:01 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Unley
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by Jetters »

marbles wrote:Great win by houton over uni. are all the uni boys in brazil? :)

feeling for smosh boys, 30 goal loss. sure they chose to come to div 7 (if not forced too) but 50 blokes again just want a kick and a catch on a saturday arvo made to play highly tuned paid agraders. what a ridiculous competition :)

seeing wingfield kick 8 goals a great sign must have won a lot of footy contests on the day so keep rising royals


ffs.
tomo
Under 16s
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:43 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Kenilworth
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by tomo »

Demon Juke wrote:
marbles wrote:Great win by houton over uni. are all the uni boys in brazil? :)

feeling for smosh boys, 30 goal loss. sure they chose to come to div 7 (if not forced too) but 50 blokes again just want a kick and a catch on a saturday arvo made to play highly tuned paid agraders. what a ridiculous competition :)

seeing wingfield kick 8 goals a great sign must have won a lot of footy contests on the day so keep rising royals


was told uni had 8 out.


Give credit where credit is due!!!

We played a good game!!!!

If uni cant cover 8 players being out when they have about 200 play for their club and 3 sides below their c's to pull players up from their must be something wrong.

When we have 8 players out it's a different story!!! We are a small club with limited numbers
And lets face what team doesnt have 8 players out this time of year!!!!
finn
League - Best 21
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:51 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide University
Location: adelaide
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by finn »

tomo wrote:
Demon Juke wrote:
marbles wrote:Great win by houton over uni. are all the uni boys in brazil? :)

feeling for smosh boys, 30 goal loss. sure they chose to come to div 7 (if not forced too) but 50 blokes again just want a kick and a catch on a saturday arvo made to play highly tuned paid agraders. what a ridiculous competition :)

seeing wingfield kick 8 goals a great sign must have won a lot of footy contests on the day so keep rising royals


was told uni had 8 out.


Give credit where credit is due!!!

We played a good game!!!!

If uni cant cover 8 players being out when they have about 200 play for their club and 3 sides below their c's to pull players up from their must be something wrong.

When we have 8 players out it's a different story!!! We are a small club with limited numbers
And lets face what team doesnt have 8 players out this time of year!!!!


Just an aside here; it's somebody from Hope Valley who has said about Uni having 8 out; nobody from Uni has said this or used it as an excuse.
Houghton won against the side Uni had on the ground that's all they can do.
always forgive your enemies...nothing annoys them so much
User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:57 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Location: Titan
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by marbles »

well on sportsbet it would have been Uni ahead in the betting

houghton have some quality cattle but not enough to be imposing at this stage IMO

i suspect even the houghton boys were a little bit stunned to have done so well

i suspect uni knowing come september, cattle availability is increased as losing this game is no biggy for them

but with north pines on the rise, the loss could mean uni may lose the double chance and may face an elimination final

end of the day houghton stronger for it so look out and they now officially 2nd best side in comp
tomo
Under 16s
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:43 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Kenilworth
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by tomo »

marbles wrote:well on sportsbet it would have been Uni ahead in the betting

houghton have some quality cattle but not enough to be imposing at this stage IMO

i suspect even the houghton boys were a little bit stunned to have done so well

i suspect uni knowing come september, cattle availability is increased as losing this game is no biggy for them

but with north pines on the rise, the loss could mean uni may lose the double chance and may face an elimination final

end of the day houghton stronger for it so look out and they now officially 2nd best side in comp



So we have beaten every side except for Smithfield and we are not 'enough to be imposing'!!!

Why would we be stunned that we beat uni?,
Are you saying we don't have faith in our own team and each other??

North Pines are a good team when at full strength but how often will that be??? They still need to make their way into the top 5 to play finals and have only won three games so far.

And no we will not take them lightly!!
User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:57 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Location: Titan
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by marbles »

Ricky o'loughlin & his 10 recruits only showed up about 4 weeks ago

you'll see, they not the same as when u first met them :)

but hmmm uni did beat them, and when we played them it was with about 15 players lol
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:46 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by Q. »

marbles wrote:houghton have some quality cattle but not enough to be imposing at this stage IMO

i suspect even the houghton boys were a little bit stunned to have done so well


Stunned? Exhausted more like it.

Much like in Round 1, the game was won in the second quarter. They did hit back at us in the third, but never enough to grab the lead.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
Posts: 55273
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:13 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by Lightning McQueen »

marbles wrote:Great win by houton over uni. are all the uni boys in brazil? :)

feeling for smosh boys, 30 goal loss. sure they chose to come to div 7 (if not forced too) but 50 blokes again just want a kick and a catch on a saturday arvo made to play highly tuned paid agraders. what a ridiculous competition :)

seeing wingfield kick 8 goals a great sign must have won a lot of footy contests on the day so keep rising royals


What clubs would be throwing around coin in Div. 7 marbles?
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:57 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Location: Titan
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by marbles »

Lightning McQueen wrote:
marbles wrote:Great win by houton over uni. are all the uni boys in brazil? :)

feeling for smosh boys, 30 goal loss. sure they chose to come to div 7 (if not forced too) but 50 blokes again just want a kick and a catch on a saturday arvo made to play highly tuned paid agraders. what a ridiculous competition :)

seeing wingfield kick 8 goals a great sign must have won a lot of footy contests on the day so keep rising royals


What clubs would be throwing around coin in Div. 7 marbles?


well being the head of accounting at the SAAFL and having such detailed information at my peril i can only say...

how the f##k would i know :roll:

one could only speculate of the big names in this division,

if u wanna claim that smithfield, houghton or north pines have no incentives for their bigger names to stick around down here, thats fine but go piss on everyone elses leg

the bottom line of it all...

agrade = can be f#cked footballers
cgrade = cant be f#cked footballers

u obviously think its fair putting 2 sides like this against each other, i dont

and your obviously one who kicks on all night claiming your boys were superb today - hello you played a pack of C-Grade cant be f##ked footballers
Robb_Stark
League - Best 21
Posts: 1810
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:31 am
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by Robb_Stark »

how does North Pines combat the points system each week you only get 15 points
Phantom Gossiper
Coach
Posts: 11144
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:05 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Gold Coast Suns

Re: SAAFL Division 7 2014

Post by Phantom Gossiper »

marbles wrote:the bottom line of it all...

agrade = can be f#cked footballers
cgrade = cant be f#cked footballers

u obviously think its fair putting 2 sides like this against each other, i dont

and your obviously one who kicks on all night claiming your boys were superb today - hello you played a pack of C-Grade cant be f##ked footballers

And here we go again on the marbles Super C grade round-about discussion :lol:
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 44 guests