by bennymacca » Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:46 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Jun 07, 2014 4:22 pm
bennymacca wrote:Do we know you won't be able to get there via Morphett st?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by johntheclaret » Sat Jun 07, 2014 6:01 pm
by dedja » Sat Jun 07, 2014 6:15 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Jun 07, 2014 6:46 pm
dedja wrote:I'm amazed no-one's brought up the disgraceful way the AFL engineered the Pirie St bike lane.
#shambles
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by dedja » Sat Jun 07, 2014 7:28 pm
by Pseudo » Sat Jun 07, 2014 10:30 pm
Apachebulldog wrote:So personally WIN LOSE OR DRAW i will not be attending AFL games in a COMPROMISED SANFL.
The two headed supporters by attending these games are legitimising the whole concept of this debacle.
So to some SANFL supporters if you still do not understand the your SANFL club is competing against MULTI MILLION DOLLAR AFL franchises there is no hope and the SANFL is doomed.
In the end it is the perogative of each individual supporter to make up his mind if he wants to support the AFL INVASION.
I will not be a party to this FARCE !!!!!
by holden78 » Sun Jun 08, 2014 2:58 pm
Pseudo wrote:Apachebulldog wrote:So personally WIN LOSE OR DRAW i will not be attending AFL games in a COMPROMISED SANFL.
The two headed supporters by attending these games are legitimising the whole concept of this debacle.
So to some SANFL supporters if you still do not understand the your SANFL club is competing against MULTI MILLION DOLLAR AFL franchises there is no hope and the SANFL is doomed.
In the end it is the perogative of each individual supporter to make up his mind if he wants to support the AFL INVASION.
I will not be a party to this FARCE !!!!!
by PhilH » Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:20 pm
by JK » Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:26 pm
by PhilH » Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:30 pm
by JK » Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:36 pm
by PhilH » Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:38 pm
by JK » Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:45 pm
PhilH wrote:Glenelg was in the heavy rain, Central at 12.40pm, South a night game were all poor crowds under 2K., 3100 at Richmond picked it up a bit. With games at Unley & Alberton to come it should pick up a bit.
by LPH » Sun Jun 08, 2014 9:22 pm
by Apachebulldog » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:36 am
holden78 wrote:Pseudo wrote:Apachebulldog wrote:So personally WIN LOSE OR DRAW i will not be attending AFL games in a COMPROMISED SANFL.
The two headed supporters by attending these games are legitimising the whole concept of this debacle.
So to some SANFL supporters if you still do not understand the your SANFL club is competing against MULTI MILLION DOLLAR AFL franchises there is no hope and the SANFL is doomed.
In the end it is the perogative of each individual supporter to make up his mind if he wants to support the AFL INVASION.
I will not be a party to this FARCE !!!!!
[/quote
We totally agree, but talking to some of the heads that have a say in SANFL footy, they had it rammed down their necks that without the Gayfl twosome, the comp would be broke in 2 years!
So there's f all chance of a change now, but the structure of this comp needs fixing so it's about the 8 SANFL clubs again because at the moment it's all about the two loudmouth Cancers ffs!
Two things we would do straight away. Firstly, Candys and PAPS get 18 games per season then they can play each other until Xmas if they want!
Secondly, any SANFL club that is lucky enough to sneak a win against the Candys or PAPS in the future should pickup 3 points for a win not the standard 2 per win!
Also anyone calling this comp the state league needs a one way ticket to North Korea paid for by Davies, Olsen and Whicker from their lunch fund
by matt35 » Mon Jun 09, 2014 12:21 pm
by RB » Mon Jun 09, 2014 12:27 pm
by topsywaldron » Mon Jun 09, 2014 12:30 pm
by Mic » Mon Jun 09, 2014 12:42 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |