24laceup wrote:Ok, so 4 pages in and I still have no idea how the game panned out.... Any chance of a run down??
Port beat the Redbacks?
by Gozu » Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:48 pm
24laceup wrote:Ok, so 4 pages in and I still have no idea how the game panned out.... Any chance of a run down??
by Gozu » Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:49 pm
by whufc » Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:54 pm
Gozu wrote:Crowd 3,337
by Tassie Blues » Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:27 pm
heater31 wrote:Again Kickinit heads off on the completely wrong tangent
Get it back to the thread topic or it will be locked.....
by mickey » Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:40 pm
whufc wrote:Gozu wrote:Crowd 3,337
3000k of them would have been dogs fans
by saintal » Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:05 pm
by dogbreath » Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:06 pm
mickey wrote:whufc wrote:Gozu wrote:Crowd 3,337
3000k of them would have been dogs fans
So three thousand thousand central supporters were there!
by Grahaml » Mon Apr 21, 2014 2:47 am
by johntheclaret » Mon Apr 21, 2014 8:02 am
heater31 wrote:Again Kickinit heads off on the completely wrong tangent
Get it back to the thread topic or it will be locked.....
by Dutchy » Mon Apr 21, 2014 10:03 am
by wristwatcher » Mon Apr 21, 2014 1:00 pm
johntheclaret wrote:heater31 wrote:Again Kickinit heads off on the completely wrong tangent
Get it back to the thread topic or it will be locked.....
Maybe you should try deleting his posts if you feel he is constantly taking threads off topic.
What's the point of having rules if all you want to do is lock a thread when a habitual troll is only interested in ...... Trolling
Hey guess what... That's another rule of the site isn't it, no trolling.
Come on Mods, do the right thing and get these idiots off the boards
by Mic » Mon Apr 21, 2014 3:39 pm
by woodublieve12 » Mon Apr 21, 2014 4:17 pm
Mic wrote:A sad day for SA footy. Even more unfortunate was that it was against a team who voted, "No".
by whufc » Mon Apr 21, 2014 4:22 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Mic wrote:A sad day for SA footy. Even more unfortunate was that it was against a team who voted, "No".
Not sad at all. Dogs not good enough... Sturt and north both knocked the crows off!!!
by RB » Mon Apr 21, 2014 4:49 pm
wristwatcher wrote:johntheclaret wrote:heater31 wrote:Again Kickinit heads off on the completely wrong tangent
Get it back to the thread topic or it will be locked.....
Maybe you should try deleting his posts if you feel he is constantly taking threads off topic.
What's the point of having rules if all you want to do is lock a thread when a habitual troll is only interested in ...... Trolling
Hey guess what... That's another rule of the site isn't it, no trolling.
Come on Mods, do the right thing and get these idiots off the boards
Half the threads will be locked if they did that and that many posts would be deleted threads wouldn't make sense.
It's only a page or two ago that some ass clown said anyone who barracks for Port isn't a true SA football fan. Not sure if thats Pure troll or some mentally challenged muppet on a keyboard but at the end of the day I think you just have to laugh it off.
I find it hilarious the amount of people on the site who feel they have the right to tell people who, how and what they should support and how specific supporting can validate your legitimacy and right to be qualified to class yourself as a true supporter. IMO people are entitled to barrack for whoever they want, whenever they want.
I have a couple of mates who actually tell me "you are not allowed to barrack for the Crows"and get genuinely upset . So if Port aren't playing and they play a Vic/WA team I can't barrack for the Crows? I have gold Adelaide oval passes, my fiancé loves the Crows (she's not that bright) and we go to 8-10 games a year. I think that means I show more support to the Crows than I do to a lot of my over opinionated mates do their own band of beloved.
Sorry for getting off topic Mods but I just wanted to make a point and every time someone gets on here and talks up the Crows/Power reserves they don't deserve to have their integrity challenged.
by heater31 » Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:03 pm
whufc wrote:
If Norwood wanted extra cameras at Elizabeth Oval would we have gave it to them. Also what's to say the Crows won't use it to scout the SANFL teams for next time they play them giving them another extra advantage that the SAnFL clubs don't have
by whufc » Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:04 pm
heater31 wrote:whufc wrote:
If Norwood wanted extra cameras at Elizabeth Oval would we have gave it to them. Also what's to say the Crows won't use it to scout the SANFL teams for next time they play them giving them another extra advantage that the SAnFL clubs don't have
The team and the club are allowed access to the vision if they wish. It's not just for the AFL whores....
by passionatelegsfan » Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:31 pm
wristwatcher wrote:johntheclaret wrote:heater31 wrote:Again Kickinit heads off on the completely wrong tangent
Get it back to the thread topic or it will be locked.....
Maybe you should try deleting his posts if you feel he is constantly taking threads off topic.
What's the point of having rules if all you want to do is lock a thread when a habitual troll is only interested in ...... Trolling
Hey guess what... That's another rule of the site isn't it, no trolling.
Come on Mods, do the right thing and get these idiots off the boards
Half the threads will be locked if they did that and that many posts would be deleted threads wouldn't make sense.
It's only a page or two ago that some ass clown said anyone who barracks for Port isn't a true SA football fan. Not sure if thats Pure troll or some mentally challenged muppet on a keyboard but at the end of the day I think you just have to laugh it off.
I find it hilarious the amount of people on the site who feel they have the right to tell people who, how and what they should support and how specific supporting can validate your legitimacy and right to be qualified to class yourself as a true supporter. IMO people are entitled to barrack for whoever they want, whenever they want.
I have a couple of mates who actually tell me "you are not allowed to barrack for the Crows"and get genuinely upset . So if Port aren't playing and they play a Vic/WA team I can't barrack for the Crows? I have gold Adelaide oval passes, my fiancé loves the Crows (she's not that bright) and we go to 8-10 games a year. I think that means I show more support to the Crows than I do to a lot of my over opinionated mates do their own band of beloved.
Sorry for getting off topic Mods but I just wanted to make a point and every time someone gets on here and talks up the Crows/Power reserves they don't deserve to have their integrity challenged.
by Spargo » Mon Apr 21, 2014 6:00 pm
passionatelegsfan wrote:If you think that port should have the right to call themselves south australian after the amount of times they have shit on this state, then I would suggest that it is you who are mentally challenged!!
by whufc » Mon Apr 21, 2014 6:03 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |