by sydney-dog » Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:17 pm
Connolly was a very highly rated assistant coach, at the time he had the option of 2 or 3 jobs, we have now have had the opportunity to observe Connolly as a head coach and he has been very disappointing
The Media seems to pump up certain assistants, but what they we base these evaluations on, what makes Harvey a front runner, the Bombers and now Freo have been disappointing in recent seasons...
If the Eagles win the Flag, does that make Sumich the front runner, none of us are close enough to the clubs to understand the impact these assistants have on the playing group, preperation and style of play.
Last year the Horse was pumped up as a certainty for the Saints job, but by all reports he fell well short and his preperation and presentation was very disappointing, the final decision came down between Lyon and McKenna
Who says that the coach needs to come from an assistant background, is their any reason why Lyon, Voss, Carey or Silvani could not walk straight in to the role, was Leigh Mathews ever an assistant
I just don't know how anyone assistant can be viewed a front runner, the club needs to ensure it has developed the right selection criteria for it's club and a rigorous process that answers all the questions needed to make the right selection.
Chris Bond and Mark Harvey have been talked up for many years now, both have failed to secure the head role, this speaks loudly