by Wedgie » Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:18 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by whufc » Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:33 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:35 pm
by Ted E Bear » Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:37 pm
by whufc » Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:39 pm
Jim05 wrote:Poor game by the Legs, Dogs pressure was far too good but doesnt excuse guys for not tackling or chasing. Too many Legs players ran up the white flag early which was disappointing.
Glenn was fantastic, we had very few who could hold their heads high. And thanks to the SANFL for serving up that abyssmal time slot, worst crowd ive ever seen at Lizbef
by Gozu » Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:50 pm
by StrayDog » Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:53 pm
Jim05 wrote:Poor game by the Legs, Dogs pressure was far too good but doesnt excuse guys for not tackling or chasing. Too many Legs players ran up the white flag early which was disappointing.
Glenn was fantastic, we had very few who could hold their heads high. And thanks to the SANFL for serving up that abyssmal time slot, worst crowd ive ever seen at Lizbef
by whufc » Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:56 pm
StrayDog wrote:Jim05 wrote:Poor game by the Legs, Dogs pressure was far too good but doesnt excuse guys for not tackling or chasing. Too many Legs players ran up the white flag early which was disappointing.
Glenn was fantastic, we had very few who could hold their heads high. And thanks to the SANFL for serving up that abyssmal time slot, worst crowd ive ever seen at Lizbef
Fair points Jim.
Personally, the time slot worked well in my family's situation but judging by the turnout that was by no means a unanimous view. As usual we parked in the car-park near the bowling centre and recall seeing so few cars there on a match day against Norwood. From that I figured probably 2,500, didn't look to be far off inside the ground. For a commercially broadcast game, not a great look for the League IMO.
by bulldogproud2 » Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:01 pm
by UK Fan » Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:04 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by JK » Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:08 pm
by fester69 » Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:16 pm
by whufc » Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:19 pm
JK wrote:One BIG unknown for Norwood (imho), will be the different dynamic of the onball brigade. There were some decent size bodies around the ball with Suckling, Zorsi, Thomas and even Grigg, all of whom played a physical style game. With those guys missing and Bartlett and Allan coming in, it should keep the skill level intact, but will they function as well without any onball hardmen? Well done to the Dogs today, our boys could really learn from their desperation, desire and commitment.
by Wedgie » Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:28 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by sjt » Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:47 pm
by jim5112 » Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:56 pm
by SDK » Sat Apr 12, 2014 10:32 pm
by cennals05 » Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:00 am
by smac » Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:13 am
by Mic » Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:16 am
cennals05 wrote:After quarter time it was some of the best football Centrals have played over the last couple of years. I thought Thomas, Williams and Goodrem were all great. Potter's clearance work was good and the run of Nason was a huge factor in the win.
Great to see some of the reserves players step up and play well. It was one of those games where everyone played their role.
I thought Norwood look tired and out of legs (pardon the pun) by the end of the second quarter.
Kris Grant let his feelings known about the AFL reserves teams at the presentations afterwards.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |