been there done that wrote:Can anyone shed any info on Rick Fox from Kilburn
Yes.
by wristwatcher » Fri Apr 04, 2014 10:23 pm
been there done that wrote:Can anyone shed any info on Rick Fox from Kilburn
by been there done that » Fri Apr 04, 2014 10:26 pm
by S Demon » Fri Apr 04, 2014 10:33 pm
Tailem Bend with his mate Moonybeen there done that wrote:what can tell me about his football ability? Follow a country team in the RMFL and he has applied for a clearance to play there.
by S Demon » Fri Apr 04, 2014 10:41 pm
been there done that wrote:is he any good?
by been there done that » Fri Apr 04, 2014 10:46 pm
by Cohiba » Fri Apr 04, 2014 11:10 pm
been there done that wrote:Is he worth any of those figures? HA HA or is that too much?
by easy TIGA » Sat Apr 05, 2014 8:08 am
been there done that wrote:is he any good?
by Phantom Gossiper » Sat Apr 05, 2014 9:41 am
by Nearly Was » Sat Apr 05, 2014 11:11 am
by tigerpie » Sat Apr 05, 2014 12:24 pm
wristwatcher wrote:been there done that wrote:Can anyone shed any info on Rick Fox from Kilburn
Yes.
by Demon Juke » Sat Apr 05, 2014 5:46 pm
by gadj1976 » Sat Apr 05, 2014 6:06 pm
Demon Juke wrote:Kilburn lost by 55 goals and there "b" grade forfeit, league should had made the hard decision and put them in "c1".
by Cohiba » Sat Apr 05, 2014 6:35 pm
Demon Juke wrote:Kilburn lost by 55 goals and there "b" grade forfeit, league should had made the hard decision and put them in "c1".
by Phantom Gossiper » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:23 pm
Cohiba wrote:Demon Juke wrote:Kilburn lost by 55 goals and there "b" grade forfeit, league should had made the hard decision and put them in "c1".
If they reposition Kilburn now......Ramblers would be laughing their heads off with the % advantage they got by playing the Chics first up. Dare say the remaining eight side won't be amused.....if that is what happens.
by Footy Chick » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:25 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Cohiba wrote:Demon Juke wrote:Kilburn lost by 55 goals and there "b" grade forfeit, league should had made the hard decision and put them in "c1".
If they reposition Kilburn now......Ramblers would be laughing their heads off with the % advantage they got by playing the Chics first up. Dare say the remaining eight side won't be amused.....if that is what happens.
If they move kilburn now think you'll find today will become a 10 goal forfeit win
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Demon Juke » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:37 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Cohiba wrote:Demon Juke wrote:Kilburn lost by 55 goals and there "b" grade forfeit, league should had made the hard decision and put them in "c1".
If they reposition Kilburn now......Ramblers would be laughing their heads off with the % advantage they got by playing the Chics first up. Dare say the remaining eight side won't be amused.....if that is what happens.
If they move kilburn now think you'll find today will become a 10 goal forfeit win
by The Dark Knight » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:39 pm
by carey » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:58 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:55 goal loss! Is that some kind of record??
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |