SS SA v Tas

Footy Smart · Post by **Footy Smart** » Wed Nov 20, 2013 3:36 pm

Starts Friday

My side:

Hughes
Klinger
Head
Ferguson
Cooper
Botha
Ludeman
Lawford
Mennie
Sayers
Zampa

Post by **RustyCage** » Wed Nov 20, 2013 3:41 pm

That's a pretty strong team. Lawford has been impressive in his two games.

Hopefully this pitch isn't as much of a road as the last one

Footy Smart · Post by **Footy Smart** » Wed Nov 20, 2013 3:55 pm

pafc1870 wrote:That's a pretty strong team. Lawford has been impressive in his two games.

Hopefully this pitch isn't as much of a road as the last one

Boys a heavy ball and no mug with the bat. with Mennie in form with the bat and him coming in lower order plus Zampa's hitting it adds some fight in our tail and we finally have class in the top order

Post by **heater31** » Wed Nov 20, 2013 3:58 pm

pafc1870 wrote:That's a pretty strong team. Lawford has been impressive in his two games.

Hopefully this pitch isn't as much of a road as the last one

If Shrek plays this one I think he gets upgraded to a contracted player.

Coach Bombay · Post by **Coach Bombay** » Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:12 am

I would put richo in for mennie.

He has struggled to take wickets so far, needs a rest.

bennymacca · Post by **bennymacca** » Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:21 am

lawford is the biggest unit i have ever seen. didnt see him bowl but it was pretty awesome to see him go out and whack agar for about 20 off his first two overs at the crease

Footy Smart · Post by **Footy Smart** » Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:33 am

bays09 wrote:I would put richo in for mennie.

He has struggled to take wickets so far, needs a rest.

Mennie has bowled ok - minus the wickets and batted well in the lower order. If your going on stats (foolish) you could say that sayers should miss out.

Post by **RustyCage** » Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:55 am

Mennie has been good at keeping the pressure on at one end this season, has bowled well for little reward

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Thu Nov 21, 2013 6:50 pm

Faulkner has been released from 12th man duties and will play

stan · Post by **stan** » Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:09 am

I like the pace attack of Sayers, Lawford and Mennie at the moment. The problem was AO was a road last game. Tough for all. Zampa is a good youg leggie and with Botha adds variety. Just worred that while Botha can handle a bat well for a bowler he isnt a no.6. Always a worry.

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:32 am

Good point stan and that was after the road at Glenelg.

Coach Bombay · Post by **Coach Bombay** » Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:49 am

Michael Klinger
Phillip Hughes
Travis Head
Tom Cooper
Callum Ferguson
Johan Botha (c)
Tim Ludeman (wk)
Joe Mennie
Adam Zampa
Kane Richardson
Chadd Sayers

hawks21 · Post by **hawks21** » Fri Nov 22, 2013 11:04 am

Tasmania win the toss and bat

bennymacca · Post by **bennymacca** » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:04 pm

stan wrote:I like the pace attack of Sayers, Lawford and Mennie at the moment. The problem was AO was a road last game. Tough for all. Zampa is a good youg leggie and with Botha adds variety. Just worred that while Botha can handle a bat well for a bowler he isnt a no.6. Always a worry.

ludeman needs to improve his batting to the point where he can bat at 6

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:33 pm

the joker · Post by **the joker** » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:34 pm

Another match for 2 points.

Coach Bombay · Post by **Coach Bombay** » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:47 pm

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:52 pm

Link

http://www.redbacks.com.au/Article/News ... 13&id=2021

Coach Bombay · Post by **Coach Bombay** » Fri Nov 22, 2013 2:24 pm

par score on adel oval would be about 800

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Fri Nov 22, 2013 3:31 pm

Tas 3/133

SS SA v Tas

SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Re: SS SA v Tas

Who is online