MRP at it again

[Armytank]

If you think Malceski thought to himself after being hit by Buddy "great, if I look really hurt here I might be able to get him suspended for next weeks game" you are giving him a lot of credit.

I would suspect that it was more along the lines of "Oh shit, this is going to hurt for a long time"

Really people.....

[daysofourlives]

If you think Malceski thought to himself after being hit by Buddy "great, if I look really hurt here I might be able to get him suspended for next weeks game" you are giving him a lot of credit.

I would suspect that it was more along the lines of "Oh shit, this is going to hurt for a long time"

Really people.....

Or what about $ydney sitting around saturday and sunday coming up with their medical report, i know let's send him for a scan that should get buddy up from low impact to at least medium impact.

[Armytank]

I would suggest that it is part of Sydney's duty of care to one of its employee's that after a suspected concusion a scan be conducted to fully understand the amount of damage/injury.

Imagine if he played the next week if the concusion was more serious and he passed out mid game. Who is the Melbourne player who is suing for damages due to brain injury sustained while playing football?

One could argue that the medical report got Buddy off from having more games suspended.

I for one don't think a medical report should have any impact on suspension lengths and outcomes. If the intent is the same during an attempt (striking/charging/whatever) as it is during an act (stricking/charging/whatever) it should be the same result.

It is like saying "well, you swung a hay maker Mr Thug Footballer. If you had made contact and hit him, we would have given you 5 weeks, if you broke his jaw we would have given you 9 weeks, but because you can't punch for shit and you missed him, you only get one."

[RustyCage]

If he missed, wouldn't the charge go from striking to attempted striking?

[daysofourlives]

I would suggest that it is part of Sydney's duty of care to one of its employee's that after a suspected concusion a scan be conducted to fully understand the amount of damage/injury.

Imagine if he played the next week if the concusion was more serious and he passed out mid game. Who is the Melbourne player who is suing for damages due to brain injury sustained while playing football?

One could argue that the medical report got Buddy off from having more games suspended.

I for one don't think a medical report should have any impact on suspension lengths and outcomes. If the intent is the same during an attempt (striking/charging/whatever) as it is during an act (stricking/charging/whatever) it should be the same result.

It is like saying "well, you swung a hay maker Mr Thug Footballer. If you had made contact and hit him, we would have given you 5 weeks, if you broke his jaw we would have given you 9 weeks, but because you can't punch for shit and you missed him, you only get one."

He didnt have scans for his brain or concussion he had it on his jaw which they wouldve had a fair idea there was no damge but we'll send him for scansanyway as it will look worse for buddy

As iv said before shit club, dog act, everything handed to them by the AFL and yet they still have only 2 premierships to show for it

[Armytank]

If he missed, wouldn't the charge go from striking to attempted striking?

my point is that there should be no such charge as attempted whatever

Shouldn't get it easy just for not being good enough to actually do what you were trying to do.

[Armytank]

I would suggest that it is part of Sydney's duty of care to one of its employee's that after a suspected concusion a scan be conducted to fully understand the amount of damage/injury.

Imagine if he played the next week if the concusion was more serious and he passed out mid game. Who is the Melbourne player who is suing for damages due to brain injury sustained while playing football?

One could argue that the medical report got Buddy off from having more games suspended.

I for one don't think a medical report should have any impact on suspension lengths and outcomes. If the intent is the same during an attempt (striking/charging/whatever) as it is during an act (stricking/charging/whatever) it should be the same result.

It is like saying "well, you swung a hay maker Mr Thug Footballer. If you had made contact and hit him, we would have given you 5 weeks, if you broke his jaw we would have given you 9 weeks, but because you can't punch for shit and you missed him, you only get one."

He didnt have scans for his brain or concussion he had it on his jaw which they wouldve had a fair idea there was no damge but we'll send him for scansanyway as it will look worse for buddy

As iv said before shit club, dog act, everything handed to them by the AFL and yet they still have only 2 premierships to show for it

Ah, the old "we have more flags than you have" blah blah blah.

Get you tinfoil hat off mate

[Spargo]

Days, you used to be entertaining and even funny at times, now you just snipe and write utter shit.

[woodublieve12]

I would suggest that it is part of Sydney's duty of care to one of its employee's that after a suspected concusion a scan be conducted to fully understand the amount of damage/injury.

Imagine if he played the next week if the concusion was more serious and he passed out mid game. Who is the Melbourne player who is suing for damages due to brain injury sustained while playing football?

One could argue that the medical report got Buddy off from having more games suspended.

I for one don't think a medical report should have any impact on suspension lengths and outcomes. If the intent is the same during an attempt (striking/charging/whatever) as it is during an act (stricking/charging/whatever) it should be the same result.

It is like saying "well, you swung a hay maker Mr Thug Footballer. If you had made contact and hit him, we would have given you 5 weeks, if you broke his jaw we would have given you 9 weeks, but because you can't punch for shit and you missed him, you only get one."

He didnt have scans for his brain or concussion he had it on his jaw which they wouldve had a fair idea there was no damge but we'll send him for scansanyway as it will look worse for buddy

As iv said before shit club, dog act, everything handed to them by the AFL and yet they still have only 2 premierships to show for it

[The Sleeping Giant]

I would suggest that it is part of Sydney's duty of care to one of its employee's that after a suspected concusion a scan be conducted to fully understand the amount of damage/injury.

Imagine if he played the next week if the concusion was more serious and he passed out mid game. Who is the Melbourne player who is suing for damages due to brain injury sustained while playing football?

One could argue that the medical report got Buddy off from having more games suspended.

I for one don't think a medical report should have any impact on suspension lengths and outcomes. If the intent is the same during an attempt (striking/charging/whatever) as it is during an act (stricking/charging/whatever) it should be the same result.

It is like saying "well, you swung a hay maker Mr Thug Footballer. If you had made contact and hit him, we would have given you 5 weeks, if you broke his jaw we would have given you 9 weeks, but because you can't punch for shit and you missed him, you only get one."

He didnt have scans for his brain or concussion he had it on his jaw which they wouldve had a fair idea there was no damge but we'll send him for scansanyway as it will look worse for buddy

As iv said before shit club, dog act, everything handed to them by the AFL and yet they still have only 2 premierships to show for it

Correction. 5 premierships.

[cracka]

I would suggest that it is part of Sydney's duty of care to one of its employee's that after a suspected concusion a scan be conducted to fully understand the amount of damage/injury.

Imagine if he played the next week if the concusion was more serious and he passed out mid game. Who is the Melbourne player who is suing for damages due to brain injury sustained while playing football?

One could argue that the medical report got Buddy off from having more games suspended.

I for one don't think a medical report should have any impact on suspension lengths and outcomes. If the intent is the same during an attempt (striking/charging/whatever) as it is during an act (stricking/charging/whatever) it should be the same result.

It is like saying "well, you swung a hay maker Mr Thug Footballer. If you had made contact and hit him, we would have given you 5 weeks, if you broke his jaw we would have given you 9 weeks, but because you can't punch for shit and you missed him, you only get one."

He didnt have scans for his brain or concussion he had it on his jaw which they wouldve had a fair idea there was no damge but we'll send him for scansanyway as it will look worse for buddy

As iv said before shit club, dog act, everything handed to them by the AFL and yet they still have only 2 premierships to show for it

1 more than Hawthorn in the last 20 years.

[daysofourlives]

I would suggest that it is part of Sydney's duty of care to one of its employee's that after a suspected concusion a scan be conducted to fully understand the amount of damage/injury.

Imagine if he played the next week if the concusion was more serious and he passed out mid game. Who is the Melbourne player who is suing for damages due to brain injury sustained while playing football?

One could argue that the medical report got Buddy off from having more games suspended.

I for one don't think a medical report should have any impact on suspension lengths and outcomes. If the intent is the same during an attempt (striking/charging/whatever) as it is during an act (stricking/charging/whatever) it should be the same result.

It is like saying "well, you swung a hay maker Mr Thug Footballer. If you had made contact and hit him, we would have given you 5 weeks, if you broke his jaw we would have given you 9 weeks, but because you can't punch for shit and you missed him, you only get one."

He didnt have scans for his brain or concussion he had it on his jaw which they wouldve had a fair idea there was no damge but we'll send him for scansanyway as it will look worse for buddy

As iv said before shit club, dog act, everything handed to them by the AFL and yet they still have only 2 premierships to show for it

1 more than Hawthorn in the last 20 years.

Ah yes but only the same amount as Hawthorn in the last 5 years.
Lets pluck some more convienient time frames shall we

[cracka]

I would suggest that it is part of Sydney's duty of care to one of its employee's that after a suspected concusion a scan be conducted to fully understand the amount of damage/injury.

Imagine if he played the next week if the concusion was more serious and he passed out mid game. Who is the Melbourne player who is suing for damages due to brain injury sustained while playing football?

One could argue that the medical report got Buddy off from having more games suspended.

I for one don't think a medical report should have any impact on suspension lengths and outcomes. If the intent is the same during an attempt (striking/charging/whatever) as it is during an act (stricking/charging/whatever) it should be the same result.

It is like saying "well, you swung a hay maker Mr Thug Footballer. If you had made contact and hit him, we would have given you 5 weeks, if you broke his jaw we would have given you 9 weeks, but because you can't punch for shit and you missed him, you only get one."

He didnt have scans for his brain or concussion he had it on his jaw which they wouldve had a fair idea there was no damge but we'll send him for scansanyway as it will look worse for buddy

As iv said before shit club, dog act, everything handed to them by the AFL and yet they still have only 2 premierships to show for it

1 more than Hawthorn in the last 20 years.

Ah yes but only the same amount as Hawthorn in the last 5 years.
Lets pluck some more convienient time frames shall we

1 more than Hawthorn in the last 8 years if u insist.

[daysofourlives]

but 4 less than Hawks in last 30 years

[Armytank]

Well my dick is about 90mm long flacid, 150mm long hard and around 48mm in diameter...........

[woodublieve12]

but 4 less than Hawks in last 30 years

but in the past 23 years we are equal....

well you're only judged on your last grand final appearance anyways.... so i've been told..

[the wonder elephant]

Well my dick is about 90mm long flacid, 150mm long hard and around 48mm in diameter...........

nice ax

[cracka]

I would suggest that it is part of Sydney's duty of care to one of its employee's that after a suspected concusion a scan be conducted to fully understand the amount of damage/injury.

Imagine if he played the next week if the concusion was more serious and he passed out mid game. Who is the Melbourne player who is suing for damages due to brain injury sustained while playing football?

One could argue that the medical report got Buddy off from having more games suspended.

I for one don't think a medical report should have any impact on suspension lengths and outcomes. If the intent is the same during an attempt (striking/charging/whatever) as it is during an act (stricking/charging/whatever) it should be the same result.

It is like saying "well, you swung a hay maker Mr Thug Footballer. If you had made contact and hit him, we would have given you 5 weeks, if you broke his jaw we would have given you 9 weeks, but because you can't punch for shit and you missed him, you only get one."

He didnt have scans for his brain or concussion he had it on his jaw which they wouldve had a fair idea there was no damge but we'll send him for scansanyway as it will look worse for buddy

As iv said before shit club, dog act, everything handed to them by the AFL and yet they still have only 2 premierships to show for it

1 more than Hawthorn in the last 20 years.

Even the crows have more flags in the last 20 years than Hawthorn. That must really hurt.

[Armytank]

Well my dick is about 90mm long flacid, 150mm long hard and around 48mm in diameter...........

nice ax

Don't you know it

[daysofourlives]

Exactly, it is getting ridiculous.

But don't blame Malceski, if Franklin hit you, you would be a quivering mess crying for your mummy.

He may have flopped like a rag doll but is no orfan this year

What happened to cracking down on staging?
Suspend someone for it and it will stop.
Why did they bring in the rule to enable them to suspend someone if they are not going to use it. Could have got Christensen for it last week or Selwood any week
I dont just blame Malceski i also blame that dog of a club he plays for

hopefully the karma bus comes along

toot toot it's here