Johno6 wrote:well hes fired now, so wont happen again.
I went to put that sign on the door and they said he wont be back.
i'd like to be a fly on the wall when he explains to his wife why he got the flick...
She'd have to feel partly responsible too

by woodublieve12 » Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:44 pm
Johno6 wrote:well hes fired now, so wont happen again.
I went to put that sign on the door and they said he wont be back.
by Failed Creation » Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:45 pm
Johno6 wrote:well hes fired now, so wont happen again.
I went to put that sign on the door and they said he wont be back.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:46 pm
Failed Creation wrote:Johno6 wrote:well hes fired now, so wont happen again.
I went to put that sign on the door and they said he wont be back.
Fired for pulling the pud is a bit of a dick move. At least he didn't pull it out in front of an audience...
by woodublieve12 » Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:46 pm
Failed Creation wrote:Johno6 wrote:well hes fired now, so wont happen again.
I went to put that sign on the door and they said he wont be back.
Fired for pulling the pud is a bit of a dick move. At least he didn't pull it out in front of an audience...
by Failed Creation » Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:53 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Failed Creation wrote:Johno6 wrote:well hes fired now, so wont happen again.
I went to put that sign on the door and they said he wont be back.
Fired for pulling the pud is a bit of a dick move. At least he didn't pull it out in front of an audience...
i reckon it was probably a bit premature to sack him...
by Booney » Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:57 pm
by Failed Creation » Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:01 pm
Booney wrote:So, lets get this straight.
Did he get fired for rubbing one out at work or the pornography?
Cause if you allow the latter you have surely got to allow the former.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:24 pm
by mickey » Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:34 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:yeah if they supply the mags, then I would go for Unfair Dismissal![]()
![]()
by mickey » Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:37 pm
by Booney » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:01 pm
mickey wrote:He could have been reading the articles
by Johno6 » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:16 pm
by smac » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:17 pm
by test » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:21 pm
by Booney » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:21 pm
Johno6 wrote:the firing was for several other things previous
this was the "icing" on the cake so to speak.
he thought he was the hardest worker in the factory..... this was not true
I have no idea how he kept his job this long
by Failed Creation » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:30 pm
Booney wrote:Johno6 wrote:the firing was for several other things previous
this was the "icing" on the cake so to speak.
he thought he was the hardest worker in the factory..... this was not true
I have no idea how he kept his job this long
No thanks, I dont want a slice.
by woodublieve12 » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:33 pm
by woodublieve12 » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:33 pm
Failed Creation wrote:Booney wrote:Johno6 wrote:the firing was for several other things previous
this was the "icing" on the cake so to speak.
he thought he was the hardest worker in the factory..... this was not true
I have no idea how he kept his job this long
No thanks, I dont want a slice.
by smac » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:43 pm
Booney wrote:Johno6 wrote:the firing was for several other things previous
this was the "icing" on the cake so to speak.
he thought he was the hardest worker in the factory..... this was not true
I have no idea how he kept his job this long
No thanks, I dont want a slice.
by mickey » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:48 pm
smac wrote:Sounds to me like he was the hardest worker in the factory.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |