SAAFL Division 8 2013

Adelaide Footy League Talk
Locked
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by Q. »

LMA wrote:Why didn't Gullies knowing the amount of players leaving the club this season just exercise their right, being a C/D grade team, to not get promoted and stay in Div 7. I'm sure one of the A grade clubs in Div 6 would of went up.


They asked, but no clubs were willing to take their place.
User avatar
LMA
Coach
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:37 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 387 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by LMA »

Q. wrote:
LMA wrote:Why didn't Gullies knowing the amount of players leaving the club this season just exercise their right, being a C/D grade team, to not get promoted and stay in Div 7. I'm sure one of the A grade clubs in Div 6 would of went up.


They asked, but no clubs were willing to take their place.


Fair enough, I would of thought it would be every clubs prerogative for their senior side to play as high as possible
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by Q. »

LMA wrote:
Q. wrote:
LMA wrote:Why didn't Gullies knowing the amount of players leaving the club this season just exercise their right, being a C/D grade team, to not get promoted and stay in Div 7. I'm sure one of the A grade clubs in Div 6 would of went up.


They asked, but no clubs were willing to take their place.


Fair enough, I would of thought it would be every clubs prerogative for their senior side to play as high as possible


From our point of view, we finished bottom, got beaten twice by the ninth side. When a decision had to be made, we'd lost 3 of our top 6 in the B&F and hadn't recruited anyone, so you can see how the committee's majority vote ended up being for D7.

As it turned out, we got thumped by CLG (D6) in a trial game.

In the end, if you wanna be a part of D7, you have to be prepared for promotion. TTG were unlucky, as previously, C/D clubs were able to make the deal with A-Grade clubs.
User avatar
LMA
Coach
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:37 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 387 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by LMA »

Q. wrote:
LMA wrote:
Q. wrote:
LMA wrote:Why didn't Gullies knowing the amount of players leaving the club this season just exercise their right, being a C/D grade team, to not get promoted and stay in Div 7. I'm sure one of the A grade clubs in Div 6 would of went up.


They asked, but no clubs were willing to take their place.


Fair enough, I would of thought it would be every clubs prerogative for their senior side to play as high as possible


From our point of view, we finished bottom, got beaten twice by the ninth side. When a decision had to be made, we'd lost 3 of our top 6 in the B&F and hadn't recruited anyone, so you can see how the committee's majority vote ended up being for D7.

As it turned out, we got thumped by CLG (D6) in a trial game.

In the end, if you wanna be a part of D7, you have to be prepared for promotion. TTG were unlucky, as previously, C/D clubs were able to make the deal with A-Grade clubs.


On the other hand they're probably lucky that they met probable finalists in the first few rounds, if they played some lesser sides first up they might have been more competitive and then it could of been too late to drop out.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by Q. »

LMA wrote:
Q. wrote:
LMA wrote:Fair enough, I would of thought it would be every clubs prerogative for their senior side to play as high as possible


From our point of view, we finished bottom, got beaten twice by the ninth side. When a decision had to be made, we'd lost 3 of our top 6 in the B&F and hadn't recruited anyone, so you can see how the committee's majority vote ended up being for D7.

As it turned out, we got thumped by CLG (D6) in a trial game.

In the end, if you wanna be a part of D7, you have to be prepared for promotion. TTG were unlucky, as previously, C/D clubs were able to make the deal with A-Grade clubs.


On the other hand they're probably lucky that they met probable finalists in the first few rounds, if they played some lesser sides first up they might have been more competitive and then it could of been too late to drop out.


Nah, everyone would have thumped them (by more probably) except for Adelaide Uni.
User avatar
Footy_Rulz
Under 16s
Posts: 282
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:44 pm
Team: Golden Grove
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by Footy_Rulz »

50 people trained to play C grade this week at TTG. Trojan horse anyone?
Golden Grove Kookaburras
User avatar
Footy_Rulz
Under 16s
Posts: 282
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:44 pm
Team: Golden Grove
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by Footy_Rulz »

7 new faces named this week. Including Stephen Daniels who played a grade at grove in 2011. This really is embarrassing for the league...
Golden Grove Kookaburras
Phantom Gossiper
Coach
Posts: 11144
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:35 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Gold Coast Suns
Has thanked: 402 times
Been thanked: 285 times

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by Phantom Gossiper »

Don't think anyone really cares anymore, it is what it is and everyone is sick of reading about it.. move on already :roll:
Robb_Stark
League - Best 21
Posts: 1810
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:01 am
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 155 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by Robb_Stark »

Footy_Rulz wrote:7 new faces named this week. Including Stephen Daniels who played a grade at grove in 2011. This really is embarrassing for the league...



so TTG fault stephen daniels wants to play div 8 ask him where he was 3 weeks ago maybe
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by Q. »

Footy_Rulz wrote:50 people trained to play C grade this week at TTG. Trojan horse anyone?


50 people! Surely your little birdie is exaggerating?
Robb_Stark
League - Best 21
Posts: 1810
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:01 am
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 155 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by Robb_Stark »

Q. wrote:
Footy_Rulz wrote:50 people trained to play C grade this week at TTG. Trojan horse anyone?


50 people! Surely your little birdie is exaggerating?



last seen running up the hill towards Houghton :)
TEX07
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:40 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Golden Grove
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 49 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by TEX07 »

Robb_Stark wrote:
Footy_Rulz wrote:7 new faces named this week. Including Stephen Daniels who played a grade at grove in 2011. This really is embarrassing for the league...



so TTG fault stephen daniels wants to play div 8 ask him where he was 3 weeks ago maybe


Who is blaming TTG? I notice the people who are "over" reading about this don't have a side in the comp, fact is, the only side that will benefit from all this is TTG I have said all along they should have sucked it up and played out the season where they started. I don't blame them for agreeing to come down, why wouldn't they? I think it was a dumb decision by SAAFL and will look even worse if TTG take out the comp, if they had so many out his week will they throw a D grade back in the mix too? We are the only ones voicing it so far because we are the only ones to have played them yet, if they beat other sides as easily they will feel the same, if not, well it is more of an indication how far away we are and not how good they are.
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español
User avatar
Footy_Rulz
Under 16s
Posts: 282
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:44 pm
Team: Golden Grove
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by Footy_Rulz »

Phantom Gossiper wrote:Don't think anyone really cares anymore, it is what it is and everyone is sick of reading about it.. move on already :roll:


Yeah I think you would be singing a different tune if your team was actually in Division 8.
Golden Grove Kookaburras
User avatar
Footy_Rulz
Under 16s
Posts: 282
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:44 pm
Team: Golden Grove
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by Footy_Rulz »

TEX07 wrote:
Robb_Stark wrote:
Footy_Rulz wrote:7 new faces named this week. Including Stephen Daniels who played a grade at grove in 2011. This really is embarrassing for the league...



so TTG fault stephen daniels wants to play div 8 ask him where he was 3 weeks ago maybe


Who is blaming TTG? I notice the people who are "over" reading about this don't have a side in the comp, fact is, the only side that will benefit from all this is TTG I have said all along they should have sucked it up and played out the season where they started. I don't blame them for agreeing to come down, why wouldn't they? I think it was a dumb decision by SAAFL and will look even worse if TTG take out the comp, if they had so many out his week will they throw a D grade back in the mix too? We are the only ones voicing it so far because we are the only ones to have played them yet, if they beat other sides as easily they will feel the same, if not, well it is more of an indication how far away we are and not how good they are.


The only scenario I am seeing at the moment is Tea Tree Gully beating someone in the grand final by 15-20 goals. They killed us and now suddenly the reinforcements have arrived, not even SMOSH West Lakes will be able to keep up with them.
Golden Grove Kookaburras
Robb_Stark
League - Best 21
Posts: 1810
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:01 am
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 155 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by Robb_Stark »

i think a few of you have gone into panic mode very quick the league is not stupid and im sure they have measures in place if need be the next 2 weeks should be a indicator of that :)
TEX07
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:40 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Golden Grove
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 49 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by TEX07 »

Robb_Stark wrote:i think a few of you have gone into panic mode very quick the league is not stupid and im sure they have measures in place if need be the next 2 weeks should be a indicator of that :)


Do agree, pretty hard to judge after one game but they were better by a long way. But like I said could have been an indication to how poor we were too.
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español
User avatar
Footy Chick
Moderator
Posts: 27021
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:44 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: anywhere I want to be...
Has thanked: 1794 times
Been thanked: 2249 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by Footy Chick »

Well you'll all be very happy to know then that TTG lost to Salisbury tonight and by a few goals too.
My new Mantra - I am no longer available to things and people that make me feel like shit
User avatar
Trader
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4667
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 12:19 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 981 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by Trader »

Footy Chick wrote:Well you'll all be very happy to know then that TTG lost to Salisbury tonight and by a few goals too.


So, tonight:
TTG lose to Salisbury

And in Rd 3:
GG lost to TTG
Salisbury lost to PAOC

And in Rd 2:
PAOC lost to GG

Therefore:
TTG < Salisbury < PAOC < GG < TTG

Something's not right there!
TTG must be playing funny buggers with selection to try and divert attention!

:lol: :roll: ;)
Danny Southern telling Plugga he's fat, I'd like to see that!
User avatar
S Demon
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4616
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 10:44 am
Team: West Adelaide
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Hope Valley
Location: The Doghouse
Has thanked: 314 times
Been thanked: 373 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by S Demon »

Robb_Stark wrote:i think a few of you have gone into panic mode very quick the league is not stupid and im sure they have measures in place if need be the next 2 weeks should be a indicator of that :)

We had a clearance put in to us, then the player changed his mind and his reason was "a heap of blokes have come out of the woodwork and we're a good chance of a premiership, so I want to stay now" Can't blame him really, most would probably do the same. Next few weeks will be very interesting
User avatar
(S)aintbackline
Reserves
Posts: 750
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:02 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Tea Tree Gully
Location: MIA
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Division 8 2013

Post by (S)aintbackline »

Footy Chick wrote:Well you'll all be very happy to know then that TTG lost to Salisbury tonight and by a few goals too.


You mean everyone who is not even in this division.
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests