 by scott » Mon May 21, 2007 12:33 am
by scott » Mon May 21, 2007 12:33 am 

 
 
                
                 by Jimmy » Mon May 21, 2007 1:03 am
by Jimmy » Mon May 21, 2007 1:03 am 
spell_check wrote:Jimmy wrote:nice work spelly
Cheers, Jimmy, but the stat wasn't really out of the ordinary, just a standard stat for me.

 by spell_check » Mon May 21, 2007 11:57 pm
by spell_check » Mon May 21, 2007 11:57 pm 
Jimmy wrote:spell_check wrote:Jimmy wrote:nice work spelly
Cheers, Jimmy, but the stat wasn't really out of the ordinary, just a standard stat for me.
true, but you got mentioned in the paper
 
 
 
 
                
                 by spell_check » Tue May 22, 2007 12:17 am
by spell_check » Tue May 22, 2007 12:17 am 
spell_check wrote:Jimmy wrote:spell_check wrote:Jimmy wrote:nice work spelly
Cheers, Jimmy, but the stat wasn't really out of the ordinary, just a standard stat for me.
true, but you got mentioned in the paper
Well that's a plus, I suppose.
I'm going to do some high scoring quarter stats combined from the Reserves, 19s and 17s. Keep in mind that they are mostly matches from 1998-2001 and 2006 and last year, along with the Reserves from 2005. The newspaper(s) only had selected quarter scores in between (very few).
 
 
                
                 
 
                
                 by Squawk » Wed May 23, 2007 10:02 pm
by Squawk » Wed May 23, 2007 10:02 pm 
scott wrote:"REGULAR Footy SA website blogger spell_check revealed an interesting statistic from the last SANFL Round. The North v Sturt under-19 game featured 20 goals in the last quarter. Sturt kicked 11.1 while North managed 9.1. Possibly more entertaining than the flood-plagued AFL."
 by spell_check » Thu May 24, 2007 12:34 am
by spell_check » Thu May 24, 2007 12:34 am 
Squawk wrote:scott wrote:"REGULAR Footy SA website blogger spell_check revealed an interesting statistic from the last SANFL Round. The North v Sturt under-19 game featured 20 goals in the last quarter. Sturt kicked 11.1 while North managed 9.1. Possibly more entertaining than the flood-plagued AFL."
FootySA - Editorial oversight?
 ) about it.
 ) about it. 
 
                
                 by spell_check » Thu May 24, 2007 12:37 am
by spell_check » Thu May 24, 2007 12:37 am 
GWW wrote:Shouldn't it be stats_check and not spell_check?
 
 
                
                 by scott » Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:56 pm
by scott » Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:56 pm 
 by MightyEagles » Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:41 pm
by MightyEagles » Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:41 pm 
scott wrote:Not quite the gravity of spelly's U/19s fact, but I thought I'd rebirth this thread as this is interesting nonetheless.
Yesterday in the U/17s at Woodville, the Eagles (who had 5.8 to 3QT) kicked 8.5 in the last quarter, with Norwood kicking 7.0 and ultimately won by a few goals. There was 19 goals kicked to 3QT and then 15.5 kicked in the last ... a quarter which lasted 36 minutes and 30 seconds.
 
 
                
                 
                
                 by spell_check » Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:33 pm
by spell_check » Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:33 pm 

 
 
                
                 by bosvit » Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:03 pm
by bosvit » Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:03 pm 

 
 
                
                 by spell_check » Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:25 pm
by spell_check » Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:25 pm 
bosvit wrote:Does West Adelaide's effort on Sat count?
3 goals to 3/4 time
7 goals in the last???
 
 
                
                 by spell_check » Fri Feb 29, 2008 11:16 pm
by spell_check » Fri Feb 29, 2008 11:16 pm 
spell_check wrote:I'll have them up tomorrow night, but that 122 points is the record for the games I have.
 
 
                
                 Football
 Football  SANFL History Forum
 SANFL History Forum
	
	
                                                        Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |
                                                        

