
by Squids » Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:12 pm
by Jim05 » Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:21 pm
Squids wrote:Just looked at who Port play this weekend
by RustyCage » Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:43 pm
Jim05 wrote:Squids wrote:Just looked at who Port play this weekend
Hawks on the rebound, could be 150+ loss
by Squids » Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:20 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Squids wrote:Just looked at who Port play this weekend
Hawks on the rebound, could be 150+ loss
150 would be better than what we did against them last year!
by Media Park » Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:17 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:28 am
by smac » Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:32 am
by stan » Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:54 am
by Psyber » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:49 am
by Booney » Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:12 pm
Psyber wrote:Sadly I think the coach was the least of the Power's problems - it all looks much as it did late in Mark Williams time.
From what I've seen on the televised matches, sometimes the players try and sometimes they don't.
(Sure there is also a manpower deficiency.)
A broader clean out than just the coach is required.
by Psyber » Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:19 pm
TRUE - it is a real bind.Booney wrote:Agreed, but with draft set ups it is impossible to turn over a list in under 3-4 years, plus we clearly dont have the money to terminate contracts early and pay the players out.Psyber wrote:Sadly I think the coach was the least of the Power's problems - it all looks much as it did late in Mark Williams time.
From what I've seen on the televised matches, sometimes the players try and sometimes they don't.
(Sure there is also a manpower deficiency.)
A broader clean out than just the coach is required.
by Footy Smart » Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:20 pm
Booney wrote:Psyber wrote:Sadly I think the coach was the least of the Power's problems - it all looks much as it did late in Mark Williams time.
From what I've seen on the televised matches, sometimes the players try and sometimes they don't.
(Sure there is also a manpower deficiency.)
A broader clean out than just the coach is required.
Agreed, but with draft set ups it is impossible to turn over a list in under 3-4 years, plus we clearly dont have the money to terminate contracts early and pay the players out.
by hawkseye » Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:36 pm
by Rik E Boy » Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:42 pm
Squids wrote:Two things could happen, Hawthorn come out livid and try and destroy the Power or Geelong mentally destroyed the Hawks last Friday night and they come out flat and only win by 10 goals.
by overloaded » Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:09 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by scoob » Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:24 pm
Media Park wrote:Option three:
Hawks have Power's attitude of last week ("We're only play that Port rabble), try and play million dollar footy, and the Power bust their hump to prove they aren't totally useless, get the jump on the Hawks, and win the thing.
I think it's unlikely, but it could happen.
by RustyCage » Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:28 pm
scoob wrote:Media Park wrote:Option three:
Hawks have Power's attitude of last week ("We're only play that Port rabble), try and play million dollar footy, and the Power bust their hump to prove they aren't totally useless, get the jump on the Hawks, and win the thing.
I think it's unlikely, but it could happen.
Don't feed the trolls!
by scoob » Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:31 pm
by Magpiespower » Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:19 pm
overloaded wrote:I honstly think this week will bond the players together and we can cause an upset.
by NO-MERCY » Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:24 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |