by hearts on fire » Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:58 pm
by stan » Fri Nov 04, 2011 8:19 am
hearts on fire wrote:Can see both advantages and disadvantages of taking him... but personally i would love to see him running around in a Power gurnsey, bit of an "x-factor" player that will be good value for the next few years and a lot of the younger generation see him as a "superstar" of the game, so might brighten up the look at the Power and get a few more people on board... and show people the players do wanna come to Port.
by Booney » Fri Nov 04, 2011 9:12 am
Pat Malone wrote:Taking Leon Davis is a different scenario to Chad Cornes. Cornes was obviously on the downward spiral, where as Leon is coming off an AA year.
Leon can be used on the ball, down forward or down back, where Chad's best positions where either at CHB, already covered by Chaplin and limiting opportunites for Trengove, or as the 2nd big forward, arguably better invested by playing Butcher or Westhoff.
It wont hinder the development of Port's younger players as Moore, Pittard and Co. will be played in their best positions and Leon will be worked around that. If anything, it will stop forcing Primus to pick players from SANFL Reserves who are not worthy of a game but gifted one due to a lack of depth.
by Pup » Fri Nov 04, 2011 11:28 am
hearts on fire wrote:Can see both advantages and disadvantages of taking him... but personally i would love to see him running around in a Power gurnsey, bit of an "x-factor" player that will be good value for the next few years and a lot of the younger generation see him as a "superstar" of the game, so might brighten up the look at the Power and get a few more people on board... and show people the players do wanna come to Port.
by stan » Fri Nov 04, 2011 2:14 pm
Pup wrote:hearts on fire wrote:Can see both advantages and disadvantages of taking him... but personally i would love to see him running around in a Power gurnsey, bit of an "x-factor" player that will be good value for the next few years and a lot of the younger generation see him as a "superstar" of the game, so might brighten up the look at the Power and get a few more people on board... and show people the players do wanna come to Port.
He wants to go to Perth, thats the bottom line.
2 years at maximum for him and Port are not in their window and wont be in that time, waste of time and devlopment that they could be putting into someone else.
by Booney » Fri Nov 04, 2011 2:37 pm
by Pup » Fri Nov 04, 2011 4:10 pm
stan wrote:Pup wrote:hearts on fire wrote:Can see both advantages and disadvantages of taking him... but personally i would love to see him running around in a Power gurnsey, bit of an "x-factor" player that will be good value for the next few years and a lot of the younger generation see him as a "superstar" of the game, so might brighten up the look at the Power and get a few more people on board... and show people the players do wanna come to Port.
He wants to go to Perth, thats the bottom line.
2 years at maximum for him and Port are not in their window and wont be in that time, waste of time and devlopment that they could be putting into someone else.
Pup do we really want him?
by Pat Malone » Fri Nov 04, 2011 4:45 pm
Booney wrote:Chads form, IMO, was due to the manner in which he was handled early in 2011. He was fit and ready to go and wasn't picked early, confidence down...form goes out the window too.
I acknowledge the difference between Chad and Leon in 2011, but IMO Davis was only as good as his team mates around him and has shown on more than one occasion he does not perform on the big stage.
We've just employed a new group of coaches and they should be the ones to develop the young group, not a bloke who has packed up with the sniffles because of money.
Lets face it, if family was the reason and his is in Perth then that would be the only place he would want to be.
by drifter » Fri Nov 04, 2011 8:21 pm
by Rik E Boy » Fri Nov 04, 2011 11:16 pm
by The Dark Knight » Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:18 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Port Power are at their best at this time of year...then the matches start.![]()
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:26 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Port Power are at their best at this time of year...then the matches start.![]()
regards,
REB
THE Power.
by The Dark Knight » Sat Nov 05, 2011 6:27 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Port Power are at their best at this time of year...then the matches start.![]()
regards,
REB
THE Power.
We're the real Power my son...
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Sat Nov 05, 2011 7:10 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Port Power are at their best at this time of year...then the matches start.![]()
regards,
REB
THE Power.
We're the real Power my son...
regards,
REB
Only correcting you on there name there mate, haven't had the "Port Power" tag for quite a while, plus it sounds horrible.
by The Dark Knight » Sat Nov 05, 2011 7:43 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:THE Power.
We're the real Power my son...
regards,
REB
Only correcting you on there name there mate, haven't had the "Port Power" tag for quite a while, plus it sounds horrible.
It matters not what Adelaide Crows Lite prefer to call themselves. The Port experiment has proven to be a failure.
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Sat Nov 05, 2011 10:23 pm
by marbles » Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:19 pm
by marbles » Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:25 pm
by Booney » Mon Nov 07, 2011 9:13 am
Rik E Boy wrote:
The Port experiment has proven to be a failure.
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:06 pm
Booney wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:
The Port experiment has proven to be a failure.
regards,
REB
Please explain?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |