by Brodlach » Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:36 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Bum Crack » Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:37 pm
by Media Park » Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:46 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by CoverKing » Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:23 pm
by Sky Pilot » Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:28 pm
CoverKing wrote:He is denying putting the bet on for himself. Stating he put it on for a mate. If it's true and he didn't influence the decision, nothing wrong with it IMO
by Jim05 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:43 pm
by smac » Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:45 pm
Jim05 wrote:Dumb, dumb, dumb.
As an Essendon member i hope they throw the book at him.
Crap excuse, everyone knows the rules
by Sky Pilot » Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:48 pm
by Bum Crack » Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:49 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:so are you blokes saying that by placing a bet he was then able to manipulate the outcome of the game to suit his own ends?
by Hondo » Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:58 pm
by Bum Crack » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:00 pm
Hondo wrote:I've got to agree with you Bum Crack
skypilot - it's the thin edge of the wedge. You go hard on these incidents to hopefully avoid the scenario you mention in the future.
by Sky Pilot » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:10 pm
by the milky bar kid » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:13 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:My point is that Wallis is not playing in the game so whether or not he lays a bet on it, isn't it at his own risk? How could he possibly manipulate the outcome? If he was a player then he could easily screw up in the name of collecting a bet. But as as an assistant coach with Hirdy and Thompson and Goodwin all breathing down his neck how in hell could he alter the natural course of the game.
by Johno6 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:13 pm
by NO-MERCY » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:21 pm
CoverKing wrote:He is denying putting the bet on for himself. Stating he put it on for a mate. If it's true and he didn't influence the decision, nothing wrong with it IMO
by Booney » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:25 pm
CoverKing wrote:He is denying putting the bet on for himself. Stating he put it on for a mate. If it's true and he didn't influence the decision, nothing wrong with it IMO
by Booney » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:27 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:so are you blokes saying that by placing a bet he was then able to manipulate the outcome of the game to suit his own ends?
by Sky Pilot » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:30 pm
by Media Park » Sat Sep 03, 2011 8:57 am
NO-MERCY wrote:CoverKing wrote:He is denying putting the bet on for himself. Stating he put it on for a mate. If it's true and he didn't influence the decision, nothing wrong with it IMO
Yeah right...........was it put on for Goodwin?
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Gozu » Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:59 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |