Dogwatcher wrote:You have the right to remain silent.
Just sayin'.
Very true Dogwatcher. But innocent people rarely use that right.
Dogwatcher wrote:You have the right to remain silent.
Just sayin'.
purch wrote:
He can chose to stay silent, but silence does tend to imply guilt (just from my jury service experience).
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Dutchy wrote:
So innocent until proven guilty doesnt apply in your world?
Without any eyewitnesses it was never going to happen.Dutchy wrote:Sturt had the chance to put forward a report but didnt.
Dutchy wrote:Kirk doesnt have "form" with this type of incident.
purch wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:You have the right to remain silent.
Just sayin'.
Very true Dogwatcher. But innocent people rarely use that right.
HOORAY PUNT wrote:Stampy & Dedja will know.If no luck there , ring the Sturt Footy Club .
HOORAY PUNT wrote:Have you told you wives ? Not that there is anything wrong with that .
dedja wrote:lost their handbags ...
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:And What about the Neale incident??
CUTTERMAN wrote:dedja wrote:lost their handbags ...
so they've done their time with a Bay past player and been looking for new blood then,
stampy wrote:purch wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:You have the right to remain silent.
Just sayin'.
Very true Dogwatcher. But innocent people rarely use that right.
DPP are you?
CENTURION wrote:WTF? We have all these umpires these days yet no-one (apparently) sees these (alleged) incidents?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 330 guests