Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Post Reply
sigur
Mini-League
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:35 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by sigur »

dedja wrote:Some mixed messages on the street for this one ... same say conspiracy, others have mention the grassy knoll , and then there's the magic bullett. :-??


He clearly knocked himself out by running into the invisible tree branch that haunts the bay oval. Justin McConnel used to trip over it all the time. Only Backwell could see it - he was always ducking under it.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
Posts: 2966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:20 pm
Team: Sturt
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by CUTTERMAN »

That no one has seen the incident (or not professing to have seen it), that Kirk himself hasn't come out and said what happened (which you would think he would if it was an accident) or any other player for that matter, we are just going to have to accept that it was a football collision and move on, however hard it is to believe that you can have such a football collision 50m away from the play.
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 6:47 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Carlton
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Snouts Hill
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by Dirko »

CUTTERMAN wrote:That no one has seen the incident (or not professing to have seen it), that Kirk himself hasn't come out and said what happened (which you would think he would if it was an accident) or any other player for that matter, we are just going to have to accept that it was a football collision and move on, however hard it is to believe that you can have such a football collision 50m away from the play.


Perhaps Kirky has come out and spoken to people at Sturt. He's definitely told Glenelg what happened. The information I have heard was it was nothing more then a football collision and that's it.

In the mean time, keep thinking about the conspiracies, and keep assassinating Kirky's character.

Nothing better then assuming a bloke is guilty of "thuggery" when you have no evidence of such.
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
Posts: 2966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:20 pm
Team: Sturt
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by CUTTERMAN »

SJABC wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:That no one has seen the incident (or not professing to have seen it), that Kirk himself hasn't come out and said what happened (which you would think he would if it was an accident) or any other player for that matter, we are just going to have to accept that it was a football collision and move on, however hard it is to believe that you can have such a football collision 50m away from the play.


Perhaps Kirky has come out and spoken to people at Sturt. He's definitely told Glenelg what happened. The information I have heard was it was nothing more then a football collision and that's it.

In the mean time, keep thinking about the conspiracies, and keep assassinating Kirky's character.

Nothing better then assuming a bloke is guilty of "thuggery" when you have no evidence of such.

Where have I put forward a conspiracy theory, when have I assassinated his character? I've basically just pointed out that there is no real evidence either way and that we have to accept that it is a football collision, remembering that most football collisions happen reasonably near the ball.
So have another read and just admit that your wrong. :) then if you're big enough you can give me an apology ;)
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
stampy
Coach
Posts: 9170
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:51 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Christies Beach
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by stampy »

85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:
whufc wrote:Obviously the Glenelg bloke did something, footballers dont go off on a stretcher with a suspected broken jaw and neck injuries through thin air. Maybe it was in retaliation maybe it wasnt.
No footage and no 100% witnesses caught the incident so the bloke can not be suspended on pure speculation.
Worse thing for the Glenelg bloke is KARMA has a very funny way of catching up with people, it may not happen this week, next week or in a years time but karma tends to bite most people on the a..... sorry bottom.

There have been numerous incidents on sports fields where an injury occurs without there being a reportable incident to cause it.

I can't believe that without anyone seeing the incident, a player's reputation is affected and is tarnished to being known as "a thug".

I would have thought the Sturt Cheer Squad would have had a good view? It happened at their end of the ground?
Surely another Sturt player would have remonstrated straight away if a vicious act occurred.

No-one from the Sturt FC wants to take it any further, so why do some posters on here?
I would have expected any Sturt supporter from the crowd who could be a witness, would have put their hand up by now.
It's obvious there isn't any evidence to back up an act of violence occurred.

Should this be a topic for the 'Conspiracy Theory Lover's Thread?" :?



well, well, well, no-one has bothered to respond to you 85wagy, and why am i not surprised? it just goes to show what a bunch of trash talking pied piper following imbeciles all of these nitwits are, none of them have a clue what happened yet are screaming for blood on the basis of what?

as for you cutterman, how the hell do you know what daniel kirk has or hasnt done to clear his name since saturday??? you dont have a ******* clue, all of you are a disgrace
Go The Tiges!!!
SANFLnut
Reserves
Posts: 880
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:36 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Happy Valley
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by SANFLnut »

Perhaps Kirky has come out and spoken to people at Sturt. He's definitely told Glenelg what happened. The information I have heard was it was nothing more then a football collision


If it does not break any confidence, please elaborate on what he has told Glenelg. I am finding it hard to imagine a football collision that could occur in the circumstances described. I am dead against any behind the play acts that tarnish our competition. I am left a little disappointed that the league have put their heads in the sand and release a statement along the lines of "we have no footage and we have not really tried to find out what happened therefore we don't have any evidence and can't proceed". The SANFL should be doing more to provide an answer about what occurred.
on the rails
League - Top 5
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:10 am
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by on the rails »

SJABC wrote: Perhaps Kirky has come out and spoken to people at Sturt. He's definitely told Glenelg what happened. The information I have heard was it was nothing more then a football collision and that's it.

In the mean time, keep thinking about the conspiracies, and keep assassinating Kirky's character.

Nothing better then assuming a bloke is guilty of "thuggery" when you have no evidence of such.


Wouldn't matter if Kirk told GFC Officials that he deliberately took out Wundke, they were hardly going to hand him up and he isn't going to certainly admit anything to the opposing club or SANFL now is he? "Football collision" is another way of saying Kirk got lucky!
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
User avatar
ElizabethVCRThief
Rookie
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:31 am
Location: Cash Converters
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by ElizabethVCRThief »

stampy wrote:
85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:
whufc wrote:Obviously the Glenelg bloke did something, footballers dont go off on a stretcher with a suspected broken jaw and neck injuries through thin air. Maybe it was in retaliation maybe it wasnt.
No footage and no 100% witnesses caught the incident so the bloke can not be suspended on pure speculation.
Worse thing for the Glenelg bloke is KARMA has a very funny way of catching up with people, it may not happen this week, next week or in a years time but karma tends to bite most people on the a..... sorry bottom.

There have been numerous incidents on sports fields where an injury occurs without there being a reportable incident to cause it.

I can't believe that without anyone seeing the incident, a player's reputation is affected and is tarnished to being known as "a thug".

I would have thought the Sturt Cheer Squad would have had a good view? It happened at their end of the ground?
Surely another Sturt player would have remonstrated straight away if a vicious act occurred.

No-one from the Sturt FC wants to take it any further, so why do some posters on here?
I would have expected any Sturt supporter from the crowd who could be a witness, would have put their hand up by now.
It's obvious there isn't any evidence to back up an act of violence occurred.

Should this be a topic for the 'Conspiracy Theory Lover's Thread?" :?



well, well, well, no-one has bothered to respond to you 85wagy, and why am i not surprised? it just goes to show what a bunch of trash talking pied piper following imbeciles all of these nitwits are, none of them have a clue what happened yet are screaming for blood on the basis of what?

as for you cutterman, how the hell do you know what daniel kirk has or hasnt done to clear his name since saturday??? you dont have a ******* clue, all of you are a disgrace


Kirk obviously hasn't done much to clear his name as far as the Sturt footy club are concerned.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/sturt-frustrated-by-non-report/story-e6freckc-1226115415814

Give us some more swear words and personal attacks Stampy, you are huge!
stampy
Coach
Posts: 9170
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:51 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Christies Beach
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by stampy »

personal attacks? mate you should go to etsa park i think
Go The Tiges!!!
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 6:47 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Carlton
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Snouts Hill
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by Dirko »

CUTTERMAN wrote:Where have I put forward a conspiracy theory, when have I assassinated his character? I've basically just pointed out that there is no real evidence either way and that we have to accept that it is a football collision, remembering that most football collisions happen reasonably near the ball.
So have another read and just admit that your wrong. :) then if you're big enough you can give me an apology ;)


Go back and read the thread. You insinuated Kirky was a sniper.

As for the rest of my post I was actually referring to the other Sturt posters on here not you.
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by Booney »

How far away from the play was this "football collision"?
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 6:47 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Carlton
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Snouts Hill
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by Dirko »

Booney wrote:How far away from the play was this "football collision"?


Happened in the Car Park when Wundke arrived at the Oval. Was delayed concussion.....
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by Booney »

SJABC wrote:
Booney wrote:How far away from the play was this "football collision"?


Happened in the Car Park when Wundke arrived at the Oval. Was delayed concussion.....


Typical Glenelg thug. 8)
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 6:47 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Carlton
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Snouts Hill
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by Dirko »

Booney wrote:
SJABC wrote:
Booney wrote:How far away from the play was this "football collision"?


Happened in the Car Park when Wundke arrived at the Oval. Was delayed concussion.....


Typical Glenelg thug. 8)


Did I say a Glenelg bloke did it?

He tripped over Tamblings knitting needles that fell out of his bag.....
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47486
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:54 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by Dutchy »

So Sturt are frustrated the SANFL didnt report Kirk, but how do they expect the charge to stick if no one saw anything?

I find it very hard to believe no Sturt player would have seen what happened if it was malicous.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
Posts: 2966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:20 pm
Team: Sturt
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by CUTTERMAN »

SJABC wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:Where have I put forward a conspiracy theory, when have I assassinated his character? I've basically just pointed out that there is no real evidence either way and that we have to accept that it is a football collision, remembering that most football collisions happen reasonably near the ball.
So have another read and just admit that your wrong. :) then if you're big enough you can give me an apology ;)


Go back and read the thread. You insinuated Kirky was a sniper.

As for the rest of my post I was actually referring to the other Sturt posters on here not you.

You're an idiot. I have never insinuated Kirk was a sniper, you in your paranoia have interpreted that. If anything I've suggested that the whole thing be forgotten about.
That's it, I'm not going to argue with such a tool as yourself, I'm right, your wrong, I'm cool and you're a tool!
:lol:
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 5:10 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Fremantle
Location: Fremantle
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by Barto »

Although there may be nothing in the incident in the wash up, the Glenelg supporters here would probably react the same way if they saw one of their players hospitalised.

Don't let me get in the way of the flying off handles though. Seems like an interesting hobby.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
stampy
Coach
Posts: 9170
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:51 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Christies Beach
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by stampy »

SJABC wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:Where have I put forward a conspiracy theory, when have I assassinated his character? I've basically just pointed out that there is no real evidence either way and that we have to accept that it is a football collision, remembering that most football collisions happen reasonably near the ball.
So have another read and just admit that your wrong. :) then if you're big enough you can give me an apology ;)


Go back and read the thread. You insinuated Kirky was a sniper.

As for the rest of my post I was actually referring to the other Sturt posters on here not you.



banging your head against a brick wall like me jabber i'm afraid.

All the informed ones who think they know what happened should ring 82714611 ask duane massey sturts footy ops manager for his thoughts on the matter
Go The Tiges!!!
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 5:10 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Fremantle
Location: Fremantle
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by Barto »

stampy wrote:
SJABC wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:Where have I put forward a conspiracy theory, when have I assassinated his character? I've basically just pointed out that there is no real evidence either way and that we have to accept that it is a football collision, remembering that most football collisions happen reasonably near the ball.
So have another read and just admit that your wrong. :) then if you're big enough you can give me an apology ;)


Go back and read the thread. You insinuated Kirky was a sniper.

As for the rest of my post I was actually referring to the other Sturt posters on here not you.



banging your head against a brick wall like me jabber i'm afraid.

All the informed ones who think they know what happened should ring 82714611 ask duane massey sturts footy ops manager for his thoughts on the matter


It's already clear what Mass thinks by the lack of further action.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
Posts: 20533
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:34 pm
Team: Glenelg
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Contact:

Re: Glenelg v Sturt Match Review

Post by am Bays »

Barto wrote:Although there may be nothing in the incident in the wash up, the Glenelg supporters here would probably react the same way if they saw one of their players hospitalised.

Don't let me get in the way of the flying off handles though. Seems like an interesting hobby.


Mate we did following Saturdays game, we just aren't banging on about it. Fortunately he didn't need to be to admitted.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dissident and 279 guests