by The Informer » Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:05 pm
by Dogwatcher » Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:20 pm
by Booney » Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:43 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:53 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:17 pm
by Dogwatcher » Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:18 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:24 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:That's a fair call. But you'd think that anyone who's got to that sort of level of business has a fair bit of a mongrel in them...
by Dogwatcher » Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:25 pm
by JK » Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:27 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:That's a fair call. But you'd think that anyone who's got to that sort of level of business has a fair bit of a mongrel in them...
Yes, don't get me wrong. He's no goodie-two-shoes, he's a very talented administrator who did well in the brewing industry and will continue to do so. I just feel, rightly or wrongly, that in the world of AFL football, you really need to be ruthless, to the point of being dishonest, and I don't think Hays is that style of person.
by Dogwatcher » Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:27 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:29 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Good point. Next question, is Triggy ruthless enough?
by Dogwatcher » Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:30 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:32 pm
JK wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:That's a fair call. But you'd think that anyone who's got to that sort of level of business has a fair bit of a mongrel in them...
Yes, don't get me wrong. He's no goodie-two-shoes, he's a very talented administrator who did well in the brewing industry and will continue to do so. I just feel, rightly or wrongly, that in the world of AFL football, you really need to be ruthless, to the point of being dishonest, and I don't think Hays is that style of person.
Which makes me wonder about the heavily rumoured incumbent, as I'm not sure he would fit that mould you've mentioned AH.
by Dogwatcher » Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:32 pm
by JK » Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:36 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Interestingly, Port are supposedly not just the only club in Adelaide in trouble but there's been no movement on the Crows board.
I'm not sure if that tell us anything, as I don't know that much about the club's operations. But the Power's board has certainly been taking a battering, hasn't it?
by Sky Pilot » Fri Jul 01, 2011 6:06 pm
by mighty hounds » Fri Jul 01, 2011 6:10 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:just reading this thread from top to bottom and reconciling that with what has been in the media for three or four weeks I'm convinced Demetriou told Port if they wanted the multi-million-dollar payout Haysman would have to go.
by Sky Pilot » Fri Jul 01, 2011 6:47 pm
mighty hounds wrote:Sky Pilot wrote:just reading this thread from top to bottom and reconciling that with what has been in the media for three or four weeks I'm convinced Demetriou told Port if they wanted the multi-million-dollar payout Haysman would have to go.
My boss didnt take up membership with Port because of him. The club has gone downhill since Cunningham left and he thought employing a Crows supporter as the CE was a bad idea. Have it on good authority he drove out the Williams'
by Sojourner » Fri Jul 01, 2011 7:15 pm
by Macca19 » Fri Jul 01, 2011 7:32 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |