by stan » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:12 pm
by Dirko » Wed Jun 22, 2011 10:31 pm
gadj1976 wrote:Why Carlton?
by Dutchy » Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:00 am
by auto » Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:57 am
by CoverKing » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:22 am
auto wrote:Would be ******* spewing if he went home. IMO the kind of player a side can be built around, many years ahead for him, can play at either end of the ground and ruck as well, would want something pretty good in return. Hope it's just a ploy for a bigger contract.
by GWW » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:38 am
by Booney » Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:09 am
by Rik E Boy » Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:43 am
Booney wrote:I know we cant afford to offer big money ( or any money! ) to players, but Trengove must be kept. We should do everything we can to keep this bloke.
Tall, mobile, skills, tough as an old boot. Got a bit of a man crush on this bloke.
by Dutchy » Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:57 am
Booney wrote:I know we cant afford to offer big money ( or any money! ) to players, but Trengove must be kept. We should do everything we can to keep this bloke.
Tall, mobile, skills, tough as an old boot. Got a bit of a man crush on this bloke.
by Booney » Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:59 am
by Jim05 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:17 am
Booney wrote:We did hear the same about Salopek and Boak in recent season though.
by JK » Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:25 am
GWW wrote:What's the Richmond link? I'm a Port supporter and I too think he's gone, but I tend to think Richmond wouldnt be his first choice, I tend to think Carlton or Essendon is more likely.
by GWW » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:15 am
by JK » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:17 am
GWW wrote:More attractive than 5 years ago perhaps but I can't see them being a better proposition than Carlton, Essendon etc. I also don't think they'll be premiership contenders within the next 5 - 7 years (not that I'm saying Port will be either).
Unless Richmond is offering a huge contract, I'd be surprised if he finished up there.
by Rik E Boy » Thu Jun 23, 2011 1:01 pm
GWW wrote:More attractive than 5 years ago perhaps but I can't see them being a better proposition than Carlton, Essendon etc. I also don't think they'll be premiership contenders within the next 5 - 7 years (not that I'm saying Port will be either).
Unless Richmond is offering a huge contract, I'd be surprised if he finished up there.
by GWW » Thu Jun 23, 2011 1:30 pm
by Barto » Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:24 pm
Booney wrote:I know we cant afford to offer big money ( or any money! ) to players, but Trengove must be kept. We should do everything we can to keep this bloke.
Tall, mobile, skills, tough as an old boot. Got a bit of a man crush on this bloke.
by CoverKing » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:56 pm
GWW wrote:More attractive than 5 years ago perhaps but I can't see them being a better proposition than Carlton, Essendon etc. I also don't think they'll be premiership contenders within the next 5 - 7 years (not that I'm saying Port will be either).
Unless Richmond is offering a huge contract, I'd be surprised if he finished up there.
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:46 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |