by locky801 » Sun May 08, 2011 7:24 pm
by the bearded wonder » Sun May 08, 2011 10:34 pm
by Pup » Sun May 08, 2011 10:59 pm
the bearded wonder wrote:Nervous week ahead for Adelaide fans. They laughed and rejoiced at Ports loss to the Suns but must now be realising it could happen to them. I know a couple of Port supporters who are waiting to pounce.
by whufc » Sun May 08, 2011 11:01 pm
Pup wrote:the bearded wonder wrote:Nervous week ahead for Adelaide fans. They laughed and rejoiced at Ports loss to the Suns but must now be realising it could happen to them. I know a couple of Port supporters who are waiting to pounce.
Crows will beat Gold Coast.
by sapaul » Sun May 08, 2011 11:24 pm
whufc wrote:Not if they put in a repeat performance of todays effort.
by Brad » Sun May 08, 2011 11:29 pm
by dedja » Sun May 08, 2011 11:31 pm
by whufc » Sun May 08, 2011 11:44 pm
sapaul wrote:whufc wrote:Not if they put in a repeat performance of todays effort.
Won't put in another perfomance like that this year.
by Gingernuts » Mon May 09, 2011 10:35 am
whufc wrote:sapaul wrote:whufc wrote:Not if they put in a repeat performance of todays effort.
Won't put in another perfomance like that this year.
you hope!
In all seriousness what star players do the Crows have in their side. How many blokes are genuinely very classy, gun, in the top 50 AFL players. Realisitcally im struggling to see any.
Even the Kangaroos have a Brent Harvey, Richmond have a Jack Riewoldt, Brisbane have Simon Black, Jonathon Brown, West Coast have Cox.
Like has been said before the Adelaide media really hypes up Crows players despite the fact some are very average.
Even the Captain Van Berlo would be lucky to be in the top 50-75 players in the AFL.
by cripple » Mon May 09, 2011 10:59 am
by Booney » Mon May 09, 2011 10:59 am
sapaul wrote:whufc wrote:Not if they put in a repeat performance of todays effort.
Won't put in another perfomance like that this year.
by TEX07 » Mon May 09, 2011 1:06 pm
whufc wrote:sapaul wrote:whufc wrote:Not if they put in a repeat performance of todays effort.
Won't put in another perfomance like that this year.
you hope!
In all seriousness what star players do the Crows have in their side. How many blokes are genuinely very classy, gun, in the top 50 AFL players. Realisitcally im struggling to see any.
Even the Kangaroos have a Brent Harvey, Richmond have a Jack Riewoldt, Brisbane have Simon Black, Jonathon Brown, West Coast have Cox.
Like has been said before the Adelaide media really hypes up Crows players despite the fact some are very average.
Even the Captain Van Berlo would be lucky to be in the top 50-75 players in the AFL.
by lebron » Mon May 23, 2011 1:12 pm
by Footy Smart » Mon May 23, 2011 1:24 pm
lebron wrote:No plan b again! Why does everyone, members, media and players and especially the scientist himself, accept that they stuck with collingwood for over 3 quarters and thats a good effort? No its not. Football is 4 quarters and you need to play it out! I hate the Adelaide media. I remember Choco losing a game in similar style, hounded over it!
And FWIW, dont argue that I should worry about my team, as I was a Crows fan until i was fed up with mediocrity, and i dont even like the bulldogs that much!
by KEYDEFENDER » Mon May 23, 2011 1:37 pm
by Footy Smart » Mon May 23, 2011 1:43 pm
KEYDEFENDER wrote:As a 'keydefender' is shits me why Adelaides backline goes for the double handed punch. Surley if you can get 2 hands to the ball you can mark it. This results in a turnover.. which is why they drill these players to tackle and create one. I counted 3 goals resulting from a Crows clearing punch when a mark was a safe and achievable option. I know thats why they did not loose the game.. but little things like this can stop the flow.
by RoosterMarty » Mon May 23, 2011 2:49 pm
Footy Smart wrote:lebron wrote:No plan b again! Why does everyone, members, media and players and especially the scientist himself, accept that they stuck with collingwood for over 3 quarters and thats a good effort? No its not. Football is 4 quarters and you need to play it out! I hate the Adelaide media. I remember Choco losing a game in similar style, hounded over it!
And FWIW, dont argue that I should worry about my team, as I was a Crows fan until i was fed up with mediocrity, and i dont even like the bulldogs that much!
Fed up with mediocrity yet you started supporting WB
AFC is better for it Lebron....
by JK » Mon May 23, 2011 2:56 pm
KEYDEFENDER wrote:As a 'keydefender' is shits me why Adelaides backline goes for the double handed punch. Surley if you can get 2 hands to the ball you can mark it. This results in a turnover.. which is why they drill these players to tackle and create one. I counted 3 goals resulting from a Crows clearing punch when a mark was a safe and achievable option. I know thats why they did not loose the game.. but little things like this can stop the flow.
by mighty hounds » Mon May 23, 2011 3:17 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:KEYDEFENDER wrote:As a 'keydefender' is shits me why Adelaides backline goes for the double handed punch. Surley if you can get 2 hands to the ball you can mark it. This results in a turnover.. which is why they drill these players to tackle and create one. I counted 3 goals resulting from a Crows clearing punch when a mark was a safe and achievable option. I know thats why they did not loose the game.. but little things like this can stop the flow.
It's my biggest pet hate in football .. I know there are times when it's acceptable to spoil from a marking position, but it's in the minority IMHO. When a player can clearly get their two hands to the ball first then FFS mark the bloody thing - Supposed to be elite footballers so an overhead mark shouldn't be out of the question.
That obviously doesn't just apply to the Crows, but IMHO it gave up two crucial last quarter goals to Collingwood yesterday.
by JK » Mon May 23, 2011 3:20 pm
mighty hounds wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:KEYDEFENDER wrote:As a 'keydefender' is shits me why Adelaides backline goes for the double handed punch. Surley if you can get 2 hands to the ball you can mark it. This results in a turnover.. which is why they drill these players to tackle and create one. I counted 3 goals resulting from a Crows clearing punch when a mark was a safe and achievable option. I know thats why they did not loose the game.. but little things like this can stop the flow.
It's my biggest pet hate in football .. I know there are times when it's acceptable to spoil from a marking position, but it's in the minority IMHO. When a player can clearly get their two hands to the ball first then FFS mark the bloody thing - Supposed to be elite footballers so an overhead mark shouldn't be out of the question.
That obviously doesn't just apply to the Crows, but IMHO it gave up two crucial last quarter goals to Collingwood yesterday.
I can understand it if you know your going to be outnumbered in the air and on the deck, or like you said if the prime purpose is to create a stoppage. But the number of times I've seen it happen at AFL level (and even SANFL level from AFL listed players) when a player is 3rd man up and has a teammate holding his opponent at bay is just crazy IMHO.
No doubt I wouldn't know as much as the coaches out there, but I really dont understand why it happens so often.
Being a defender myself, I only two handed punch if I'm going to do it over the boundary line, any other time its a spoil to a team mate thats hopefully where he should be front and square or its a mark. I was shaking my head the amount of times the Crows done it when not needed and it cost them goals at crucial stages of the match
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |