dedja wrote:LOL, I don't know what's worse, being a ...
1. Port supporter today for going down* to the Suns.
2. Crows supporter who can't gloat because of last week and this week ... then go to 1.
*edited for accuracy
by dedja » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:14 pm
dedja wrote:LOL, I don't know what's worse, being a ...
1. Port supporter today for going down* to the Suns.
2. Crows supporter who can't gloat because of last week and this week ... then go to 1.
by Jim05 » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:14 pm
by the joker » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:18 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:19 pm
by stampy » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:25 pm
by Turbo » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:25 pm
by Ruben Carter » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:26 pm
the joker wrote:Is it just my crows bias or did the crows get the rough end of the stick tonight.EG radar marked on 50 and the ump called play on. Tippo gets tackled with out the ball and not payed and Russell kicks the goal
by the joker » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:31 pm
Ruben Carter wrote:the joker wrote:Is it just my crows bias or did the crows get the rough end of the stick tonight.EG radar marked on 50 and the ump called play on. Tippo gets tackled with out the ball and not payed and Russell kicks the goal
It's just your Crows bias.
If Carlton had've finished their work properly they should've won by 10 goals
by JK » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:32 pm
Ruben Carter wrote:the joker wrote:Is it just my crows bias or did the crows get the rough end of the stick tonight.EG radar marked on 50 and the ump called play on. Tippo gets tackled with out the ball and not payed and Russell kicks the goal
It's just your Crows bias.
If Carlton had've finished their work properly they should've won by 10 goals
by CUTTERMAN » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:35 pm
Ruben Carter wrote:the joker wrote:Is it just my crows bias or did the crows get the rough end of the stick tonight.EG radar marked on 50 and the ump called play on. Tippo gets tackled with out the ball and not payed and Russell kicks the goal
It's just your Crows bias.
If Carlton had've finished their work properly they should've won by 10 goals
by leftlegger » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:46 pm
by whufc » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:48 pm
by bulldog2004 » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:51 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Ruben Carter wrote:the joker wrote:Is it just my crows bias or did the crows get the rough end of the stick tonight.EG radar marked on 50 and the ump called play on. Tippo gets tackled with out the ball and not payed and Russell kicks the goal
It's just your Crows bias.
If Carlton had've finished their work properly they should've won by 10 goals
Adelaide got slammed by the umps in the last, Reilly, Tippett, and the Carlton player caught holding the ball but wasn't paid and led to a goal. 2 Carlton goals in the last were directly attributed to wrong umpiring decisions.
If you're going to bomb for goals from outside 50 constantly you'll miss more than you get.
Ps, Ruben Carter was guilty
by McGovern » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:52 pm
whufc wrote:Crows were terrible once again, like others have said they were totally outplayed and only Carltons goal kicking kept them in the game, and even then they werent good enough to take it.
Walker and Tippett think Tackle is what you put on your fishing hook, ask them about a lead and they will tell you its something you put around your dogs neck to take him for a walk.
Them 2 are the two laziest footballers i have seen in the modern game, all they wont is the ball to be kicked over the back of the defenders.
Crows are a potential bottom 4 side.
ps. Symes was awful as well, ill be expecting to watch him soon at the dogs.
by Interceptor » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:53 pm
leftlegger wrote:Crows definitely dudded by the umpiring.
WTF! Jared Wait (thedirtyprick) gets a free for kickin' the crows blok in the nuts.
by sapaul » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:55 pm
McGovern wrote:The only truth in this drivel
by whufc » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:56 pm
McGovern wrote:whufc wrote:Crows were terrible once again, like others have said they were totally outplayed and only Carltons goal kicking kept them in the game, and even then they werent good enough to take it.
Walker and Tippett think Tackle is what you put on your fishing hook, ask them about a lead and they will tell you its something you put around your dogs neck to take him for a walk.
Them 2 are the two laziest footballers i have seen in the modern game, all they wont is the ball to be kicked over the back of the defenders.
Crows are a potential bottom 4 side.
ps. Symes was awful as well, ill be expecting to watch him soon at the dogs.
The only truth in this drivel is that Carlton's goal kicking kept them in the game.
by JK » Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:00 pm
bulldog2004 wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Ruben Carter wrote:the joker wrote:Is it just my crows bias or did the crows get the rough end of the stick tonight.EG radar marked on 50 and the ump called play on. Tippo gets tackled with out the ball and not payed and Russell kicks the goal
It's just your Crows bias.
If Carlton had've finished their work properly they should've won by 10 goals
Adelaide got slammed by the umps in the last, Reilly, Tippett, and the Carlton player caught holding the ball but wasn't paid and led to a goal. 2 Carlton goals in the last were directly attributed to wrong umpiring decisions.
If you're going to bomb for goals from outside 50 constantly you'll miss more than you get.
Ps, Ruben Carter was guilty
one goal was from andy otten dropping that mark when crows were up by 11 points.
by whufc » Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:04 pm
sapaul wrote:McGovern wrote:The only truth in this drivel
Glad someone could make sense of what he said. It is riddled with spelling mistakes and poor grammar.
by bulldog2004 » Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:13 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |